Cognitive Diagnosis of Learning Path in Geography Based on Rule Space Model

Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 308)


One of the most important advantages of E-Learning is in providing timely contents through Internet. In a similar manner, real-time assessment systems allow students to acquire instant feedback of their performance. In this article, in addition to informing students about their misconceptions on the subject that they are learning, the proposed diagnostic scheme assesses their learning behaviors and provides appropriate remedial suggestions. Therefore, the knowledge attributes tree-like structure and the learning paths are proposed and analyzed in this paper helps instructors to realize the learning progress of the entire class. Most diagnostic assessment approaches spend a relatively longer time by adjusting and inducing knowledge conceptions. The proposed Geography learning applied the rule-space model to help instructors and students to realize and diagnose learning status, attitude and remedial needs. An experiment using our system is performed to reveal the advantage of our computation method in diagnosing learning problems.


Index Terms—Diagnostic Assessment Rule-Space Model e- Learning Geography Learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Menucha, B., Anthony, K.E., Tatsuoka, K.K.: Diagnosing Knowledge States in Algebra Using the Rule Space Model. Educational Testing Service Report (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drasgow, F.: Choice of test model for appropriateness measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement 6(3), 297–308 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harnisch, D.L., Linn, R.L.: Analysis of item response patterns: Questionable test data and dissimilar curriculum practices. Journal of Educational Measurement 18(3), 39–87 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levine, M.V., Rubin, D.B.: Measuring the appropriateness of multiple-choice test scores. Journal of Educational Statistics 4(4), 269–290 (1979)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sato, T.: The construction and interpretation of S-P tables. Meiji Tosho, Tokyo (1975) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tatsuoka, K.K., Tatsuoka, M.M.: Detection of aberrant response patterns. Journal of Educational Statistics 7(3), 215–231 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wright, B.D., Stone, M.H.: Best test design, Rasch measurement. MESA Press, Chicago (1979)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sato, T.: Introduction to S-P Curve Theory Analysis and Evaluation. Meiji Tosho, Tokyo (1985) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tatsuoka, K.K.: Rule Space: An Approach for Dealing with Misconceptions based on Item Response Theory. Journal of Educational Measurement 20(4), 345–354 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sheehan, K.M., Tatsuoka, K.K., Lewis, C.: A Diagnostic Classification Model for Document Processing Skills. Educational Testing Service Report (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Katz, I.R., Martinez, M.E., Sheehan, K.M., Tatsuoka, K.K.: Extending the Rule Space Model to a Semantically-Rich Domain: Diagnostic Assessment in Architecture. Educational Testing Service Report (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. Information ManagementChung Hua UniversityHsinchuTaiwan

Personalised recommendations