Skip to main content

A Quick and Effective Method for Ranking Authors in Academic Social Network

  • Conference paper
Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 308))

Abstract

Effectively and efficiently ranking authors is a significant work in academic social network analysis. This paper investigates this problem and proposes a feasible method, QRank. First, QRank computes the initial rank score of an author based on the qualities of papers as well as the contributions of the author to those papers. In this step, QRank emphasizes the contribution of first author of a paper and can deal with the situation that only one author presents on a paper. Then, QRank refines the rank score of each author by the mutual influence between authors. Experimental results show QRank is the fast method and obtains better ranking results than the compared methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Oliveira, M., Gama, J.: An overview of social network analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2(2), 99–115 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang, X., Sun, X., Zhuge, H.: Graph-based algorithms for ranking researchers: not all swans are white! Scientometrics 96(3), 743–759 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li, E.Y., Liao, C.H., Yen, H.R.: Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy 42(9), 1515–1530 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, X., Bollen, J., et al.: Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing & Management 41(6), 1462–1480 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, X.-L., Foo, C.S., Tew, K.L., Ng, S.-K.: Searching for rising stars in bibliography networks. In: Zhou, X., Yokota, H., Deng, K., Liu, Q. (eds.) DASFAA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5463, pp. 288–292. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Daud, A., Abbasi, R., Muhammad, F.: Finding rising stars in social networks. In: Meng, W., Feng, L., Bressan, S., Winiwarter, W., Song, W. (eds.) DASFAA 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7825, pp. 13–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, Z., Tang, J., et al.: Expert2bole: From expert finding to bole search. In: KDD 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yan, E., Ding, Y.: Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(10), 2107–2118 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu, H., Feng, Y.: A measure of authors’ centrality in co-authorship networks based on the distribution of collaborative relationships. Scientometrics 81(2), 499–511 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, J., Tang, J., Li, J.Z.: Expert finding in a social network. In: Kotagiri, R., Radha Krishna, P., Mohania, M., Nantajeewarawat, E. (eds.) DASFAA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4443, pp. 1066–1069. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Cai, Y., Chakravarthy, S.: Expertise ranking of users in QA community. In: Meng, W., Feng, L., Bressan, S., Winiwarter, W., Song, W. (eds.) DASFAA 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7825, pp. 25–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Page, L., Brin, S., et al.: The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical Report 1999-66, Stanford InfoLab (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heidemann, J., Klier, M., Probst, F.: Identifying key users in online social networks: A pagerank based approach. In: ICIS 2010, p. 79 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, R., Zhang, W., Deng, H., Wang, N., Miao, Q., Zhao, X.: Discover community leader in social network with pageRank. In: Tan, Y., Shi, Y., Mo, H. (eds.) ICSI 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7929, pp. 154–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Bodendorf, F., Kaiser, C.: Detecting opinion leaders and trends in online social networks. In: ACM Workshop on Social Web Search and Mining, pp. 65–68 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/xml/

  17. http://academic.research.microsoft.com/ (accessed on October 2013)

  18. http://arnetminer.org/ (accessed on October 2013)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Longjie Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, L., Wang, X., Zhang, Q., Lei, P., Ma, M., Chen, X. (2014). A Quick and Effective Method for Ranking Authors in Academic Social Network. In: Park, J., Chen, SC., Gil, JM., Yen, N. (eds) Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 308. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54900-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54900-7_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54899-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54900-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics