Virtual Simulations and Serious Games in Community Health Nursing Education: A Review of the Literature

  • Pamela Stuckless
  • Michelle Hogan
  • Bill KapralosEmail author
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 68)


The recent shift in healthcare delivery from that of the hospital to the community calls for skilled community health nurses. The role and practice of community health nurses differs from that of a nurse clinician. Unlike the skills required for that of a nurse clinician, much of the skills required for community health nursing and their application cannot be developed and practised within newly developed and highly innovative practice laboratory facilities where the focus of patient care is the individual. Virtual simulation (and serious gaming) presents a viable, cost-effective training option for community health nursing trainees, providing the opportunity to practise within an interactive, engaging, and safe environment. In this chapter we review and examine the use of virtual simulation (including serious gaming) in health care education with a particular emphasis on community health nursing. Findings demonstrate that students and nursing educators recognize the value of virtual simulation in community health nursing education. Best practices in simulation development indicate that a framework that guides the design, implementation, and evaluation should be employed. Assessment methods of student learning have been suggested however, further research is needed on assessment techniques and learning outcomes to demonstrate that virtual simulation may be a sound pedagogical tool.


Learning Outcome Nursing Student Virtual Community Blended Learning Nurse Clinician 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The financial support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), in support of the Interactive and Multi-Modal Research Syndicate (IMMERSe) initiative, and the Canadian Network of Centres of Excellence (NCE) in support of the Graphics, Animation, and New Media (GRAND) initiative that B. Kapralos is a part of, is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. 1.
    Canadian Public Health Association.: Public health—community health nursing practice in canada: Roles and responsibilities. (Tech. Rep. No. Fourth Ed.) Canadian Public Health Association (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chin, P.: Using C and IT to Support Teaching. Taylor and Francis Group, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mangold, K.: Educating a new generation: teaching baby boomer faculty about millennial students. Nurse Educ. 32(1), 21–23 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Villeneuve, M., MacDonald, J.: Toward 2020: visions for nursing. (Tech. Rep.). Canadian Nurses Association (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sinclair, B., & Ferguson, K.: Integrating simulated teaching/learning strategies in undergraduate nursing education. Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Sch. 6(1) (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cowen, K.J., Tesh, A.S.: Effects of gaming on nursing students’ knowledge of pediatric cardiovascular dysfunction. J. Nurs. Educ. 41(11), 507–509 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bergeron, B.: Developing Serious Games. Thomson Delmar Learning, Hingham (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., Jessel, J., Rampnoux, O.: Origins of serious games. In: Ma, M., Oikonomou, A., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, pp. 25–43. Springer, London (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Susi, T., Johannesson, M., Backlund, P.: Serious games—an overview. (Tech. Rep. No. HS-IKI-TR-07-001). School of Humanities and Informatics, University of Skovde, Sweden, Feb 2007Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Becker, K., Parker, J.: The Guide to Computer Simulations and Games. Wiley, Indianapolis (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Frietas, S., Liarokapis, F.: Serious games: a new paradigm for education? In: Ma, M., Oikonomou, A., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, pp. 9–23. Springer, London (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stapleton, A. J.: Serious games: serious opportunities. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Australian game developers’ conference, P. 1–6. Melbourne, Australia (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shute, V.J., Ventura, M., Bauer, M., Zapata-Rivera, D.: Melding the power of serious games and embedded assessment to monitor and foster learning. In: Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., Vorderer, P. (eds.) Serious Games. Mechanisms and Effects. Routledge Publishers, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Squire, K., Jenkins, H.: Harnessing the power of games in education. Insight 3(1), 5–33 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Michael, D., Chen, S.: Serious Games: Games that Educate, Train and Inform. Thomson Course Technology, Boston (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oblinger, D.: Games and learning. Educause Quarterly 3(1), 5–7 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kirkley, S.E., Kirkley, J.R.: Creating next generation blended learning environments using mixed reality, video games and simulations. TechTrends 49(3), 42–53 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simpson, R.L.: See the future of distance education. Nurs. Manage. 37(2), 42–51 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Whittemore, R., Knafl, K.: The integrative review: updated methodology. J. Adv. Nurs. 52(5), 546–553 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Effective Public Health Practice Project.: Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. Canada (2011)
  21. 21.
    Thomas, B.H., Ciliska, D., Dobbins, M., Micucci, S.: The integrative review: updated methodology. Worldviews Evid. Based Nurs. 1(3), 176–184 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chinn, P.L., Kramer, M.K.: Integrated Theory and Knowledge Development in Nursing. Mosby Publishing, St. Louis (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kapralos, B., Hogan, M., Pribetic, A.I., Dubrowski, A.: Virtual simulations and serious games in a laptop-based university: gauging faculty and student perceptions. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 8(1), 107–119 (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lynch-Sauer, J., VandenBosch, T., Kron, F., Livingston Gjerde, C., Arato, N., Sen, A., Fetters, M.D.: Nursing students’ attitudes toward video games and related new media technologies. J. Nurs. Educ. 50(5), 1–11 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pittiglio, L.I., Harris, M.A., Mili, F.: Development and evaluation of a three-dimensional virtual hospital unit: VI-MED. Comput. Inf. Nurs. 29(5), 267–271 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Giddens, J.F., Shuster, G., Roehrig, N.: Early student outcomes associated with a virtual community for learning. J. Nurs. Educ. 49(6), 355–358 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shuster, G., Giddens, J.F., Roehrig, N.: Emotional connection and integration: dominant themes among undergraduate nursing students using a virtual community. J. Nurs. Educ. 50(4), 222–225 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Giddens, J.F., Fogg, L., Carlson-Sabelli, L.: Learning and engagement with a virtual community by undergraduate nursing students. Nurs. Outlook 58(5), 261–267 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schmidt, B., Stewart, S.: Implementing the virtual reality learning environment second life. Nurse Educ. 34(4), 152–155 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schmidt, B., Stewart, S.: Implementing the virtual world of second life into community nursing theory and clinical courses. Nurse Educ. 35(2), 74–78 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jeffries, P.R.: Melding the power of serious games and embedded assessment to monitor and foster learning. In: Oermann, M.H., Heinrich, K.T. (eds.) Annual review of nursing education: Innovations in curriculum, teaching and student and faculty development, pp. 161–177. Springer, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Federation of American Scientists.: Report: summit on educational games. In: National summit on educational games. Washington, DC. USA, Oct 25 2005Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Honey, M., Connor, K., Veltman, M., Bodily, D., Diener, S.: Teaching with second life: hemorrhage management as an example of a process for developing simulations for multiuser virtual environments. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 8(3), e79–e85 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Enfield, J., Myers, R.D., Lara, M., Frick, T.W.: Innovation diffusion: assessment of strategies within the diffusion simulation game. Simul. Gaming 43(2), 188–214 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hays, R.T.: The effectiveness of instructional games: a literature review and discussion. (Tech. Rep. No. 2005-004). United States Naval Air Warfare Center, Training Systems Division (2005)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thiagarajan, S., Stolovitch, H.D.: Instructional Simulation Games. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs (1978)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mitchell, A., Savill-Smith, C.: The Use of Computer and Video Games for Learning : A Review of the Literature. Learning and Skills Development Agency, London (2004)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bellotti, F., Kapralos, B., Lee, K., Moreno-Ger, P., Berta, R.: Assessment in and of serious games: an overview. Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact. (Special Issue on User Assessment in Serious Games and Technology—Enhanced Learning) 2013, 1–11 (2013)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hogan, M., Kapralos, B., Cristancho, S., Finney, K., Dubrowski, A.: Bringing community health nursing to life with serious games. Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Sch. 8(1), 1–13 (2011)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bente, G., Breuer, J.: Making the implicit explicit: embedded measurement in serious games. In: Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., Vorderer, P. (eds.) Serious Games. Mechanisms and Effects, pp. 322–343. Routledge Publishers, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Farra, S., Miller, E., Timm, N., Schafer, J.: Improved training for disasters using 3-D virtual reality simulation. West. J. Nurs. Res. 35(5), 655–671 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Knight, J.F., Carley, S., Tregunna, B., Jarvis, S., Smithies, R., deFreitas, S., Mackway-Jones, K.: Serious gaming technology in major incident triage training: a pragmatic controlled trial. Resuscitation 81(9), 1175–1179 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cook, D.A., Hamstra, S.J., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J.H., Wang, A.T., Hatala, R.: Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med. Teach. 35(1), e867–e898 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Duque, G., Fung, S., Mallet, L., Posel, N., Fleiszer, D.: Learning while having fun: the use of video gaming to teach geriatric house calls to medical students. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 56(7), 1328–1332 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brown, S.J., Lieberman, D.A., Germeny, B.A., Fan, Y.C., Wilson, D.M., Pasta, D.J.: Educational video game for juvenile diabetes: results of a controlled trial. Med. Inform. 22(1), 77–89 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Livingston, S., Fennessey, G., Coleman, J., Edwards, K., Kidder, S.: The Hopkins games program: final report on seven years of research. (Tech. Rep. No. 155). Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools (1973)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gosen, J., Washbush, J.: A review of scholarship on assessing experiential learning effectiveness. Simul. Gaming 35(2), 270–293 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Iuppa, N., Borst, T.: End-to-end game development: creating independent serious games and simulations from start to finish. Focal Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pamela Stuckless
    • 1
  • Michelle Hogan
    • 2
  • Bill Kapralos
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.VHA Home HealthCareTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Durham Region Health DepartmentWhitbyCanada
  3. 3.University of Ontario Institute for TechnologyOshawaCanada

Personalised recommendations