Abstract
Humans can detect the E-vector of incident polarized light using a subtle, transient visual phenomenon known as Haidinger’s brush. The effect is a result of the human macula having the properties of a radial analyser with peak absorption at 460 nm. A number of mechanisms, each capable of generating radial diattenuation, have been proposed: (1) oblique light incident on cone outer segments, (2) form dichroism in the Henle fibre layer (the photoreceptor axons) and (3) a perpendicular arrangement of dichroic carotenoid pigments with respect to the radially oriented Henle fibres. A close correlation between the dichroic ratio of the macula and the optical density spectrum of liposome-bound lutein and zeaxanthin provides strong evidence that macular pigment plays a key role. Corneal birefringence can affect the contrast and perceived angle of the brush, together with the appearance of the phenomenon in circularly polarized light. When the retina is photographed between crossed polarizers, a brush-like pattern is observed; this is a result of the birefringence of the Henle fibre layer and cornea and is distinct from the radial diattenuation that generates Haidinger’s brush. A secondary entoptic phenomenon that allows humans to detect the orientation of polarized light was described by Gundo von Boehm. Boehm’s brush is only visible when a polarized light source rotates in the peripheral visual field against a dark background and results from light scattering off axis into the photoreceptors. Both phenomena allow for the detection of polarized light by the unaided human eye; however, there is no evidence to suggest that such capabilities are adaptive.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bhosale P, Larson AJ, Frederick JM, Southwick K, Thulin CD, Bernstein PS (2004) Identification and characterization of a pi isoform of Glutathione S-Transferase (GSTP1) as a zeaxanthin-binding protein in the macula of the human eye. J Biol Chem 279:49447–49454
Bone RA (1980) The role of the macular pigment in the detection of polarized light. Vis Res 20:213–220
Bone RA, Landrum JT (1983) Dichroism of lutein: a possible basis for Haidinger’s brushes. Appl Opt 22:775–776
Bone RA, Landrum JT (1984) Macular pigment in Henle fiber membranes: a model for Haidinger’s brushes. Vis Res 24:103–108
Bone RA, Landrum JT, Tarsis SL (1985) Preliminary identification of the human macular pigment. Vis Res 25:1531–1535
Bone RA, Landrum JT, Cains A (1992) Optical density spectra of the macular pigment in vivo and in vitro. Vis Res 32:105–110
Bone RA, Landrum JT, Hime GW, Cains A, Zamor J (1993) Stereochemistry of the human macular carotenoids. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:2033–2040
Brink HB, van Blokland GJ (1988) Birefringence of the human foveal area assessed in vivo with Mueller-matrix ellipsometry. J Opt Soc Am A 5:49–57
De Vries HL, Spoor A, Jielof R (1953) Properties of the eye with respect to polarized light. Physica 19:419–432
Delori FC, Webb RH, Parker JS (1979) Macular birefringence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (Suppl, ARVO Abstr) 19:53
Denton EJ (1959) The contributions of the oriented photosensitive and other molecules to the absorption of the whole retina. Proc R Soc Lond B 150:78–94
Dodt E, Kuba M (1990) Visually evoked potentials in response to rotating plane-polarized blue light. Ophthalmic Res 22:391–394
Elsner AE, Weber A, Cheney MC, VanNasdale DA (2008) Spatial distribution of macular birefringence associated with the Henle fibers. Vis Res 48(26):2578–2585
Fairbairn MB (2001) Physical models of Haidinger’s brush. J R Astron Soc Can 95:248–251
Forster HWJ (1954) The clinical use of the Haidinger’s brushes phenomenon. Am J Ophthalmol 38:661–665
Fuld K, Wooten BR, Katz L (1979) The Stiles-Crawford hue shift following photopigment depletion. Nature 279:152–154
Goldschmidt M (1950) A new test for function of the macula lutea. Arch Ophthalmol 44:129–135
Gribakin FG, Govardovskii VI (1975) The role of the photoreceptor membrane in photoreceptor optics. In: Snyder AW, Menzel R (eds) Photoreceptor optics. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 215–236
Gruszecki WI, Strzalka K (2005) Carotenoids as modulators of lipid membrane physical properties. Biochim Biophys Acta 1740:108–115
Hemenger RP (1982) Dichroism of the macular pigment and Haidinger’s brushes. J Opt Soc Am A 72:734–737
Hochheimer BF (1978) Polarized light retinal photography of a monkey eye. Vis Res 18:19–23
Hochheimer BF, Kues HA (1982) Retinal polarization effects. Appl Opt 21:3811–3818
Horváth G, Varjú D (2004) Polarized light in animal vision—polarization patterns in nature. Springer, Heidelberg
Knighton RW, Huang XR (2002) Linear birefringence of the central human cornea. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:82–86
Knighton RW, Huang XR, Cavuoto LA (2008) Corneal birefringence mapped by scanning laser polarimetry. Opt Express 16:13738–13751
Laties AM, Liebman PA, Campbell CE (1968) Photoreceptor orientation in the primate eye. Nature 218:172–173
Le Floch A, Ropars G, Enoch J, Lakshminarayanan V (2010) The polarization sense in human vision. Vis Res 50:2048–2054
Lester G (1970) Haidinger’s brushes and the perception of polarization: the history to the present of an on-going problem. Acta Psychol 34:106–114
Li B, Vachali P, Frederick JM, Bernstein PS (2011) Identification of StARD3 as a lutein-binding protein in the macula of the primate retina. Biochemistry 50:2541–2549
Liebman PA, Jagger WS, Kaplan MW, Bargoot FG (1974) Membrane structure changes in rod outer segments associated with rhodopsin bleaching. Nature 251:31–37
Maxwell JC (1850) Manuscript on experiments on the cause of Haidinger’s brushes. The scientific letters and papers of James Clerk Maxwell. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 199–204
Misson GP (2003) A Mueller matrix model of Haidinger’s brushes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 23:441–447
Naylor EJ, Stanworth A (1954) Retinal pigment and the Haidinger effect. J Physiol Lond 124:543–552
Naylor EJ, Stanworth A (1955) The measurement and clinical significance of the Haidinger effect. Trans Opthalmol Soc UK 75:67–79
Ovcharenko AP, Yegorenkov VD (2002) Teaching students to observe Haidinger brushes. Eur J Phys 23:123–125
Ropars G, Le Floch A, Enoch J, Lakshminarayanan V (2012a) Direct naked-eye detection of chiral and Faraday effects in white light. Europhys Lett 97:64002–64006
Ropars G, Gorre G, Le Floch A, Enoch J, Lakshminarayanan V (2012b) A depolarizer as a possible precise sunstone for Viking navigation by polarized skylight. Proc R Soc A 468:671–684
Rothmayer M, Dultz W, Frins E, Zhan Q, Tierney D, Schmitzer H (2007) Nonlinearity in the rotational dynamics of Haidinger’s brushes. Appl Opt 46:7244–7251
Schalch W, Landrum JT, Bone RA (2009) The Eye. In: Britton G, Pfander H, Liaaen-Jensen S (eds) Carotenoids. Basel, Birkhäuser, pp 301–334
Schmidt WJ (1938) Polarisationsoptische Analyse eines Eiweiss-Lipoid-Systems, erlautert am Aussenglied der Sehzellen. Kolloid-Zeitschrift 85:137–148
Sekatski P, Brunner N, Branciard C, Gisin N, Simon C (2009) Towards quantum experiments with human eyes as detectors based on cloning via stimulated emission. Phys Rev Lett 103:113601–113604
Shurcliff WA (1955) Haidinger’s brushes and circularly polarized light. J Opt Soc Am 45:399
Sloan LL, Naquin HA (1955) A quantitative test for determining the visibility of the Haidinger brushes: clinical applications. Am J Ophthalmol 40:393–406
Snodderly DM, Auran JD, Delori FC (1984) The macular pigment. II. Spatial distribution in primate retinas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25:674–685
Stiles WS, Crawford BH (1933) The luminous efficiency of rays entering the eye pupil at different points. Proc R Soc Lond B 112:428–450
Stokes GG (1850) On Haidinger’s brushes. British Association Reports, Edinburgh
Summers DM, Friedmann GB, Clements RM (1970) Physical model for Haidinger’s brush. J Opt Soc Am 60:271–272
Van Nasdale DA, Elsner AE, Weber A, Miura M, Haggerty BP (2009) Determination of foveal location using scanning laser polarimetry. J Vis 9:1–17
von Boehm G (1940a) Über maculare (Haidinger’sche) Polarisationsbüschel und über einen polarisationsoptischen Fehler des Auges. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenhagen) 18:109–142
von Boehm G (1940b) Über ein neues entoptisches Phänomen im polarisierten Licht: “periphere” Polarisationsbüschel. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenhagen) 18:143–169
von Frisch K (1949) Die Polarisation des Himmelslichtes als orientierender Faktor bei den Tänzen der Bienen. Experientia 5:142–148
von Helmholtz H (1924) Treatise on physiological optics. In: Southall JPC (ed) Optical society of America., pp 301–308
Vos JJ, Bouman MA (1964) Contribution of the retina to entoptic scatter. J Opt Soc Am 54:95–100
Weale RA (1976) On the spectral sensitivity of the human retina to light which it has scattered. Vis Res 16:1395–1399
Zhevandrov ND (1995) Polarisation physiological optics. Physics-Uspekhi 38:1147–1166
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McGregor, J., Temple, S., Horváth, G. (2014). Human Polarization Sensitivity. In: Horváth, G. (eds) Polarized Light and Polarization Vision in Animal Sciences. Springer Series in Vision Research, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54718-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54718-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54717-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54718-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)