Advertisement

Micro-studios Meet Convergence Culture: Crossmedia, Clustering, Dialogues, Auto-communication

  • Indrek IbrusEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

The chapter builds on evolutionary approaches to media change to interpret recent Northern European examples of how the audio visual (AV) industry’s micro-companies are confronting the ‘convergence culture’ and have, therefore, innovated their output by applying some of the principles of “crossmedia strategies” or “transmedia storytelling”. Relying largely on Juri Lotman’s ‘semiotics of culture’, the chapter discusses the processes of dialogic communications and auto-communication as facilitating both the convergence and divergence phenomena in media and culture. Related to this, it conceptualizes ‘convergence’ as a metaphor which denotes a complex set of non-linear, multi-dimensional and often incompatible evolutionary processes that could still be considered as mutually conditioning and organically evolving. Focusing on several case studies of the film industry’s convergence with the ICT sector, it analyses what rationales or dynamics may motivate ‘convergence’ and what may occasionally motivate the resistance to it by some of the industry fractions or media domains. It also points to the crossmedia phenomena as a potential concern for the political economy of media; the contemporary emergence of crossmedia strategies is often perceived as conditioning certain homogenizations in culture and understood as a synonym for media concentration. If so, such ‘emergence’ may constrain the degrees of freedom for smaller enterprises in which case policy means may be justified to support the various ‘divergence’ processes in culture.

Keywords

Convergence Process Creative Industry Public Service Broadcaster Textual Matter Audio Visual 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexandrov, V. (2000). Biology, semiosis, and cultural difference in lotman’s semiosphere. Comparative Literature, 52(4), 339–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  3. Belsunces Gonçalves, A. (2012). Fringe: Playful transmedia. In I. Ibrus & C. A. Scolari (Eds.), Crossmedia innovations: Texts, markets, institutions (pp. 93–110). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  4. Bennet, J., Strange, N., Kerr, P., & Medrado, A. (2012). Multiplatforming public service broadcasting: The economic and cultural role of UK Digital and TV Independents (p. 60). London: Royal Holloway, University of Sussex, London Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
  5. Bolin, G. (2010). Digitization, multiplatform texts, and audience reception. Popular Communication, 8, 72–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Britton, J. N. H. (2007). Path dependence and cluster adaptation: A case study of Toronto’s new media industry. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 7(2-5), 272–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Broms, H., & Gahmberg, H. (1983). Communication to self in organizations and cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 482–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan-Olmsted, S. M., & Chang, B.-H. (2003). Diversification strategy of global media conglomerates: Examining its patterns and determinants. Journal of Media Economics, 16(4), 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan-Olmsted, S. M., & Chang, B.-H. (2006). Mobile wireless strategy of media firms: Examining the wireless diversification patterns of leading global media conglomerates. In J. Groebel, E. M. Noam, & V. Feldmann (Eds.), Mobile media: Content and services for wireless communications (pp. 165–183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Christensen, L. T. (1997). Marketing as auto-communication. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 1(3), 197–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Congdon, T., Graham, A., Green, D., & Robinson, B. (1995). The cross media revolution: Ownership and control. London: John Libbey.Google Scholar
  12. David, P. A. (2000). Path dependence, its critics and the quest for ‘historical economics’. In P. Garrouste & S. Ioannides (Eds.), Evolution and path dependence in economic ideas: Past and present (pp. 15–39). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  13. Doyle, G. (2010). From television to multi-platform: Less from more or more for less? Convergence, 16(4), 431–449.Google Scholar
  14. Eco, U. (1979). The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Erdal, I. J. (2009). Cross-media (re)production cultures. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 15(2), 215–231.Google Scholar
  16. Evans, E. (2011). Transmedia television: Audiences, new media, and daily life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Fagerjord, A., & Storsul, T. (2007). Questioning convergence. In T. Storsul & D. Stuedahl (Eds.), Ambivalence towards convergence. Digitalization and media change (pp. 19–31). Götenborg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  18. Feldmann, V. (2002). Competitive strategy for media companies in the mobile internet. Schmalenbach Business Review, 54(4), 351–371.Google Scholar
  19. Feldmann, V. (2005). Leveraging mobile media: Cross-media strategy and innovation policy for mobile media communication. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. Filmby Aarhus, Alexandra Institute, & High Tech Accelerator Innovation Center University of Lodz Foundation. (2011). Report on business models, value chains and business development services in the audiovisual/creative industries: Cases of the Łódź and Małopolska provinces and West Denmark (95 p.). Aarhus, Łódz.Google Scholar
  21. Garrouste, P., & Ioannides, S. (2000). Evolution and path dependence in economic ideas: Past and present. In P. Garrouste & S. Ioannides (Eds.), Evolution and path dependence in economic ideas: Past and present (pp. 1–14). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  22. Goldhaber, M. H. (1997). The attention economy and the net. First Monday, 2(4).Google Scholar
  23. Goldhaber, M. H. (2006). The value of openness in an attention economy. First Monday, 11(6–5).Google Scholar
  24. Hartley, J. (1996). Popular reality: Journalism, modernity, popular culture. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  25. Ibrus, I. (2008). Collective memory and media innovation: Interdependencies (Vol. 14, EDS Innovation Research Programme. Discussion Papers. Media, Connectivity, Literacy & Ethics). London: EDS-London School of Economics and Political Science. URL: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/EDSInnovationResearchProgramme/pdf/EDSdp014/edsdp014.pdf
  26. Ibrus, I. (2010). Evolutonary dynamics of new media forms: The case of the open mobile web. Unpublished PhD thesis. London School of Economics and Political Science. URL: http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/53/
  27. Ibrus, I. (2012). The AV industry’s microcompanies encounter multiplatform production. In I. Ibrus & C. A. Scolari (Eds.), Crossmedia innovations: Texts, markets, institutions. Hamburg: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ibrus, I. (2013a). Evolutionary dynamics of media convergence: Early mobile web and its standardisation at W3C. Telematics and Informatics, 30(2), 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ibrus, I. (2013b). Evolutionary dynamics of the mobile web. In J. Hartley, J. Burgess, & A. Bruns (Eds.), A companion to new media dynamics (pp. 277–289). Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kotov, K. (2002). Semiosphere: A chemistry of being. Sign System Studies, 30(1), 327–336.Google Scholar
  32. Krippendorff, K. (1995). Redesigning design: An invitation to a responsible future. In P. Tahkokallio & S. Vihma (Eds.), Design—Pleasure or responsibility (pp. 138–162). Helsinki: Helsinki University of Art and Design.Google Scholar
  33. Krippendorff, K. (2008). Reconciling radical constructivism with social organisations as networks of conversations and of stakeholders. Paper presented at the American Society for Cybernetics 2008 Conference, Urbana, IL, 11-15.05.2008Google Scholar
  34. Lotman, Y. (1990). Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. Bloomington, IL and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Mandelker, A. (1994). Semiotizing the sphere: Organicist theory in Lotman, Bakhtin, and Vernadsky. PMLA, 109(3), 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morsing, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto-communication: On the role of external stakeholders for member identification. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(2), 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nöth, W. (2006). Yuri Lotman on metaphors and cultures as self-referential semiospheres. Semiotica, 161(1/4), 249–263.Google Scholar
  39. Perryman, N. (2008). Doctor who and the convergence of media: A case study in ‘Transmedia Storytelling’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(1), 21–39.Google Scholar
  40. Potts, J., Cunningham, S., Hartley, J., & Ormerod, P. (2008). Social network markets: A new definition of the creative industries. Journal of Cultural Economy, 32, 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Potts, J., & Keane, M. (2011). Creative clusters and innovation. In J. Potts (Ed.), Creative industries and economic evolution (pp. 152–161). Chelthenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schönle, A., & Shine, J. (2006). Introduction. In A. Schönle (Ed.), Lotman and cultural studies: Encounters and extensions (pp. 3–35). Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  43. Steedman, M. D. (2006). State power, hegemony, and memory: Lotman and Gramsci. In A. Schönle (Ed.), Lotman and cultural studies: Encounters and extensions (pp. 136–158). Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  44. Suárez Candel, R. (2012). Adapting public service broadcasting to the multiplatform scenario—Challenges, opportunities & risks. In Working Papers of the Hans Bredow Institute (Vol. 25, 83 p.). Hamburg: Hans Bredow Institute for Media Research in Hamburg.Google Scholar
  45. Tafel-Viia, K., Lassur, S., Ibrus, I., Tafel, A., & Terk, E. (2012). Audiovisuaalvaldkonna klasterdumise perspektiivid (p. 97). Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Eesti Tuleviku-uuringute Instituut.Google Scholar
  46. Terranova, T. (2012). Attention, economy and the brain. Culture Machine, 13, 1–19.Google Scholar
  47. Tether, B. S. (1998). Small and large firms: Sources of unequal innovations? Research Policy, 27(7), 829–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tether, B. S., Smith, J., & Thwaites, A. T. (1997). Smaller enterprises and innovation in the UK: The SPRU innovations database revisited. Research Policy, 26(1), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Torop, P. (1999). Cultural semiotics and culture. Sign System Studies, 27, 9–23.Google Scholar
  50. Yang, D.-H., Kim, S., Nam, C., & Moon, J.-S. (2004). Fixed and mobile service convergence and reconfiguration of telecommunications value chains. IEEE Wireless Communications, 1(5), 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tallinn UniversityTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations