Advertisement

Recommend, Tweet, Share: User-Distributed Content (UDC) and the Convergence of News Media and Social Networks

  • Mikko VilliEmail author
  • Janne Matikainen
  • Irina Khaldarova
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

The paper explores how the participatory audience disseminates the online content produced by news media. Here, user-distributed content (UDC) acts as a conceptual framework. The concept of UDC refers to the process by which the mass media converge with the online social networks through the intentional use of social media features and platforms in order to expand the number of content delivery channels and maximize visibility online. The focus of the paper is both on the news media’s internal use (social plugins) and external use (Facebook pages, Twitter accounts) of social media tools and platforms in content distribution. The study draws on the examination of fifteen news media in seven countries. The data consists of almost 50,000 news items and the communicative activity surrounding them. The three main findings of the study are: (1) the audience shares online news content actively by using social plugins, (2) the activity of the news media in social media (especially on Facebook and Twitter) impacts the activity of the audience, and (3) the news media are more active on Twitter than on Facebook, despite the fact that the audience is often more active on Facebook. The study suggests that practices related to UDC should be more strongly incorporated into the management strategies of news media as peer-communication among the audience has a growing significance in the consumption and distribution of online media content.

Keywords

Social Medium Media Content Online Social Network News Medium News Item 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has received funding from the Helsingin Sanomat Foundation. We would also like to thank Vladimir Grigor for his help in the programming of data collection.

References

  1. Anderson, C. W., Bell, E., & Shirky, C. (2013). Post-industrial journalism: Adapting to the present. Columbia Journalism School, Tow Center for Digital Journalism. Accessed April 16, 2013, from http://towcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/TOWCenter-Post_Industrial_Journalism.pdf
  2. Banks, J., & Humphreys, S. (2008). The labour of user co-creators: Emergent social network markets? Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(4), 401–418.Google Scholar
  3. Bechmann, A. (2012). Towards cross-platform value creation. Information, Communication and Society, 15(6), 888–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benton, J. (2011). “Like,” “share,” and “recommend”: How the warring verbs of social media will influence the news’ future. Nieman Journalism Lab: Pushing to the future of journalism—A project of the Nieman Foundation at Harvard. Accessed October 18, 2012, from http://www.niemanlab.org/2011/02/like-share-and-recommend-how-the-warring-verbs-of-social-media-will-influence-the-news-future
  5. boyd, d. (2008). Facebook’s privacy trainwreck: Exposure, invasion, and social convergence. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(1), 13–20.Google Scholar
  6. boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Castells, M. (2006). The theory of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chan-Olmstead, S. M. (2006). Competitive strategy for media firms: Strategic and brand management in changing media markets. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Engesser, S., & Humprecht, E. (2012, May 24–28). How professional news media adopt Twitter: Findings of a cross-national comparison. In 2012 International Communication Association Conference, Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar
  11. Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2011, January 24–25). Hit, link, like and share: Organizing the social and the fabric of the web in a like economy. In DMI Mini-Conference, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Glynn, C. J., Huge, M. E., & Hoffman, L. H. (2012). All the news that’s fit to post: A profile of news use on social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heikkilä, H., Ahva, L., Siljamäki, J., & Valtonen, S. (2011, May 26–30). What if everyday life is not that civic? In 2011 International Communication Association Conference, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  14. Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D., & Logan, D. (2012). Share, like, recommend: Decoding the social media news consumer. Journalism Studies, 3(5–6), 815–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Himelboim, I., & McCreery, S. (2012). New technology, old practices: Examining news websites from a professional perspective. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 18(4), 427–444.Google Scholar
  16. Humphreys, L. M., Gill, P., Krishnamurthy, B., & Newbury, E. (2012, May 24–28). Historicizing new media: A content analysis of Twitter. In 2012 International Communication Association Conference, Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar
  17. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York/London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jenkins, H., & Deuze, M. (2008). Convergence culture. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(1), 5–12.Google Scholar
  19. Jensen, K. B. (2010). Media convergence: The three degrees of network, mass, and interpersonal communication. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Kontaxis, G., Keromytis, A. D., & Markatos, E. P. (2012, August). Privacy-preserving social plugins. In Proceedings of the 21st USENIX Security Symposium, Bellevue, WA.Google Scholar
  21. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010, April 26–30). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Categories and subject descriptors. In WWW 2010, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
  22. Lee, C. S., & Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Livingstone, S. (2004). The challenge of changing audiences: Or, what is the audience researcher to do in the age of the internet? European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ma, L., Lee, S. C., & Goh, D. H.-L. (2012, May 24–28). Understanding news sharing in social media: An explanation from the diffusion of innovations theory. In 2012 International Communication Association Conference, Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar
  25. Malmelin, N., & Villi, M. (2015a). Audience community as a strategic resource in media work. Journalism Practice (first published online).Google Scholar
  26. Malmelin, N., & Villi, M. (2015b). Co-creation of what? Modes of audience community collaboration in media work. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies (first published online).Google Scholar
  27. Marshall, D. P. (2004). New media cultures. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  28. Marshall, D. P. (2009). New media as transformed media industry. In J. Holt & A. Perren (Eds.), Media industries: History, theory, and method (pp. 81–89). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media and Society, 13(1), 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matikainen, J., & Villi, M. (2012, August 30–31). Mediasisältöjen tuottaminen, jakelu ja kulutus sosiaalisessa mediassa. In Finnish Conference of Communication Research, University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  31. Messner, M., Linke, M., & Eford, A. (2011, April 1). Shoveling tweets: An analysis of the microblogging engagement of traditional news organizations. In International Symposium on Online Journalism, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  32. Mitchell, A., Rosenstiel, T., & Christian, L. (2012). The state of the news media 2012: What Facebook and Twitter mean for news. The Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in News Journalism, an Annual Report on American Journalism.Google Scholar
  33. Napoli, P. M. (2009). Navigating producer-consumer convergence: Media policy priorities in the era of user-generated and user-distributed content. Bronx, NY: The Donald McGannon Communication Research Center, Fordham University.Google Scholar
  34. Napoli, P. M. (2010). Revisiting “mass communication” and the “work” of the audience in the new media environment. Media, Culture and Society, 32(3), 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newman, N. (2012). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2012: Tracking the future of news. University of Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Google Scholar
  36. Newman, N., & Dutton, W. (2011, May 26–30). Social media in the changing ecology of news production and consumption: The case in Britain. In 2011 International Communication Association Conference, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  37. Olmstead, K., Mitchell, A., & Rosenstiel, T. (2011). Navigating News Online: Where people go, how they get there and what lures them away. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism.Google Scholar
  38. Purcell, K., Rainie, L., Mitchell, A., Rosenstiel, T., & Olmstead, K. (2010). Understanding the participatory news consumer: How Internet and cell phone users have turned news into a social experience. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
  39. Sasseen, J., Olmstead, K., & Mitchell, A. (2013). Digital: As mobile grows rapidly, the pressures on news intensify. The State of the News Media 2013, The Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in News Journalism, an Annual Report on American Journalism.Google Scholar
  40. Singer, J. B., Domingo, D., Heinonen, A., Hermida, A., Paulussen, S., Quandt, T., et al. (2011). Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thurman, N. (2008). Forums for citizen journalists? Adoption of user generated content initiatives by online news media. New Media and Society, 10(1), 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Dijck, J. A. G. M. (2013). Social media platforms as producers. In T. Olsson (Ed.), Producing the internet (pp. 45–62). Göteborg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  43. van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). The network society: Social aspects of new media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Villi, M. (2012). Social curation in audience communities: UDC (user-distributed content) in the networked media ecosystem. Participations: The International Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 9(2), 614–632.Google Scholar
  45. Villi, M., & Jung, J-Y. (2015). Accessing the audience community: How newspapers connect with audience communities in Finland, Japan, and Korea. International Journal on Media Management (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  46. Wardle, C., & Williams, A. (2010). Beyond user-generated content: A production study examining the ways in which UGC is used at the BBC. Media, Culture and Society, 32(5), 781–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weeks, B. E., & Holbert, R. L. (2012, May 24–28). Predicting dissemination of news content in social media: A focus on reception, friending, and partisanship. In 2012 International Communication Association Conference, Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mikko Villi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Janne Matikainen
    • 1
  • Irina Khaldarova
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social Research, Media and Communication StudiesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations