Advertisement

Conceptual Graph: An Approach to Improve Quality of Business Services Modeling

  • Xiaofeng Du
  • William W. Song
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8182)

Abstract

Business development or renovation is to introduce newer, more efficient routines and processes through redesign or re-engineering of businesses, which form a set of business patterns. Business patterns encapsulate the best solutions for business practices and tasks confirming business strategies of the enterprise. Nowadays, services with SOA (Service oriented-Architecture) become more and more important in implementing and supporting business routines and processes. An enterprise that can encapsulate their SOA solutions into patterns will make the business more agile and effective. However, with the SOA solutions to automation of locating relevant instance services for its business patterns with minimum human intervention one has to look into the semantic and operational difference between the description of a business pattern and that of an instance service—a gap between the two levels of semantic descriptions. In this paper, we propose a conceptual modeling method to address how to bridge the gap, by a semantic service description for usage contextual approach formalized with the conceptual graphs formalism.

Keywords

Web Services service composition conceptual graphs business process modeling and patterns 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baader, F., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Description logics for the semantic web. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz 16(4), 57–59 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bieberstein, N., Bose, S., Fiammante, M., Jones, K., Shah, R.: Service-Oriented Architecture Compass: Business Value, Planning, and Enterprise Roadmap, 19. IBM Press (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chein, M., Mugnier, M.L.: Conceptual Graphs: Fundamental Notions. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle 6(4), 365–406 (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, P.P.: The Entity-Relationship Model: Toward a Unified View of Data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1, 9–36 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Du, X., Munro, M., Song, W.W.: CbSSDF: A Two Layer Conceptual Graph Description for Web Services. Accepted by the Int’l Journal on Information Systems Modelling and Design (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Du, X., Song, W., Munro, M.: A Method for Transforming Existing Web service Descriptions into an Enhanced Semantic Web service Framework. In: Proc. of 17th International Conference on Information System Development, Paphos, Cyprus, Paphos, Cyprus, August 25-27 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Endrei, M., Ang, J., Arsanjani, A., Chua, S., Comte, P., Krogdahl, P., Luo, M., Newling, T.: Patterns: Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services. International Business Machines Corporation. IBM RedBooks, International Business Machines Corporation (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mann, G.A.: Assembly of Conceptual Graphs from Natural Language by Means of Multiple Knowledge Specialists. In: Pfeiffer, H.D., Nagle, T.E. (eds.) Conceptual Structures: Theory and Implementation. LNCS, vol. 754, pp. 232–275. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Montes-y-Gómez, M., Gelbukh, A., López-López, A., Baeza-Yates, R.: Flexible Comparison of Conceptual Graphs. In: Mayr, H.C., Lazanský, J., Quirchmayr, G., Vogel, P. (eds.) DEXA 2001. LNCS, vol. 2113, pp. 102–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    RDF: Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification, W3C (1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-rdf-syntax/
  11. 11.
    Russell, C., Barnsley, P., Holladay, M.: Business Patterns within Telecommunications. The Journal of Production Planning and Control 12(2), 188–197 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Song, W.: Business Process and Integration Model: an Approach to Guide Constructing Service Flows. In: Proceeding of the IASTED Int’l Conf. on Web Technologies, Calgary, Canada, July 17-19 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, Canada (1984)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Strang, C.J.: Next generation systems architecture — the Matrix. BT Technology Journal 23(1) (January 2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Strzalkowski, T.: A Fast and Robust Parser for Natural Language. In: The 14th Int’l Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 1992), Nantes, France, pp. 198–204 (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaofeng Du
    • 1
  • William W. Song
    • 2
  1. 1.British TelecomIpswichUK
  2. 2.Informatics, Business & Technology StudiesDalarna UniversityBorlängeSweden

Personalised recommendations