Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Internationalization of Law
  • 1063 Accesses

Abstract

The boundaries between domestic and international laws are becoming more tenuous, through processes of construction, implementation, and control of norms. Law is becoming internationalized—spread across different planes. At the international level, this is seen in the densification of traditional sources of law. At the domestic and transnational levels, additional, distinct legal sources are created through direct contact among substate and transnational actors, both public and private. However, these cannot be easily classified as sources of international law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ost and Van de Kerchove (2002), p. 43.

  2. 2.

    The term evolution, as used, does not necessarily mean improvement but rather transformation.

  3. 3.

    Van de Kerchove and Ost (1994), pp. ix–x.

  4. 4.

    Narrafante, J. T. Notas a la version en español in Luhmann (2006), pp. 16 e 27; Luhmann (2006), p. 408.

  5. 5.

    Koskenniemi (2005), pp. xiii and 19.

  6. 6.

    Bobbio (1995), pp. 198–199.

  7. 7.

    Van de Kerchove and Ost (1994), pp. 3–4.

  8. 8.

    Van de Kerchove and Ost (1994), pp. ix–x and 32.

  9. 9.

    Habermas (2001).

  10. 10.

    I consider this the least inconvenient expression for this purpose. The use of “global law” could lead to a mistaken understanding of the concept as worldwide law, which is not the case. See Krish (2012), p. 6.

  11. 11.

    Jouannet (2011), p. 224.

  12. 12.

    The methodology for analysis in Part I, divided into actors, factors, and processes, was developed at the Rede de Pesquisa Figuras da Internacionalização do Direito, which the author participated in, from 2007 to 2009. The network was coordinated by Mireille Delmas-Marty, Professor at the Collège de France. However, I adapt the methodology for the necessities of the present work, which are substantially different from that collective project.

  13. 13.

    The concept of “universal law” has several meanings. At the simplest level, it can be understood as a cogent international law, applicable to all countries in the world. At a second level, it is presented as a coherent legal system. At a third level, it is presented as a bric-à-brac or loosely connected network of legal norms, to borrow the famous expression of Jean Combacau. See Combacau (1986), pp. 85–105.

  14. 14.

    Simma (2009), p. 267.

  15. 15.

    The phrase is borrowed from Mireille Delmas-Marty, developed in the collection of books, Les Forces Imaginantes du Droit. The writings of Delmas-Marty, with whom I maintained a network for discussion of research for 3 years, are fundamental to this work. Other key authors include Gunther Teubner, José Alvarez, Martii Koskenniemi, Hélène Ruiz, Emamuelle Jouannet, and François Ost, with whom I have established bridges for dialogue in recent years, with conferences and discussions held both inside and outside Brazil. Nonetheless, each of these authors has distinct ideas; this work seeks to carve out its own path, different from these others. The influence of these authors on this work is due, in part, to our direct conversations with many of them.

References

  • Bobbio N (1995) Positivismo jurĂ­dico, Lições de filosofia do direito. ĂŤcone, SĂŁo Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Combacau J (1986) Le droit international: Bric-Ă -brac ou système? Archives de Philosophie du Droit: Le système international 31:85–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (2001) Constelação pĂłs-nacional, Ensaios PolĂ­ticos, Tradução de Márcio Seligmann Silva. Litera Mundi, SĂŁo Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouannet E (2011) Le droit international liberal-providence, Une histoire du droit international. Bruylant, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskenniemi M (2005) From apology to utopia, the structure of international legal argument, reissue with a new epilogue. Cambridge University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Krish N (2012) Beyond constitutionalism, The pluralist structure of postnational law. OUP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (2006) SociologĂ­a del riesgo. Universidad Iberoamericana, MĂ©xico

    Google Scholar 

  • Ost F, Van de Kerchove M (2002) De la pyramide au reseau, Pour une thĂ©orie dialectique du droit. PĂşblications des FacultĂ©s Universitaires Saint-Louis, Boulevard du Jardin Botanique, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Simma B (2009) Universality of international law from the perspective of a practitioner. Eur J Int Law 20(2):265–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Kerchove M, Ost F (1994) The legal order between order and disorder. Clarendon University Press, Clarendon

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Varella, M.D. (2014). Introduction. In: Internationalization of Law. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54163-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics