Skip to main content

Landowning, Status and Population Growth

  • Chapter
  • 1616 Accesses

Part of the Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance book series (DMEF,volume 15)

Abstract

This paper considers the effects of the landowning and land reforms on economic and demographic growth by a family-optimization model with endogenous fertility and status-seeking. A land reform provides the peasants with strong incentives to limit their family size and to improve the productivity of land. Even though the income effect due to the land reform tends to raise fertility, a strong enough status-effect outweighs it, thus generating a decrease in population growth. The European demographic history provides supporting anecdotal evidence for this theoretical result.

Keywords

  • Fertility Decline
  • Demographic History
  • Agricultural Technology
  • Child Rear
  • Land Reform

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
EUR   29.95
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR   85.59
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR   109.99
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR   109.99
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We ignore mortality in this document, for convenience. The introduction of a constant mortality rate would complicate the analysis, without qualitatively changing the results.

  2. 2.

    If the measure for status, v, were a linearly homogeneous function of a and \({\underline{a}}\), we would obtain the same results with some complication.

  3. 3.

    Because the production function F is homogeneous of degree one [cf. (3)], its partial derivative F 2 must be homogeneous of degree zero. This and a=A/L yields (13).

  4. 4.

    This case is illustrated in Fig. 1b.

  5. 5.

    In 1820, the GDP per capita in England was 1.4 times larger than that in France, and the advantage of England only increased towards the end of the century (Maddison 1995, 194–196, and Guinnane 2011).

  6. 6.

    The cohort fertility rate in Fig. 3 gives the total number of births given by women born in the time period indicated in the figure.

  7. 7.

    Unfortunately, the land reform experienced some drawbacks which, together with the general unrest of the time, led to an outburst of a civil war in 1918. One of the conditions for the later social cohesion in Finland was the famous Lex Kallio in 1922 which made larger and wealthier farms possible for the peasants.

References

  • Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Enlarged edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesnais, J.-C. (1992). The demographic transition: stages, patterns and economic implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corneo, G., & Jeanne, O. (2001). On relative-wealth effects and long-run growth. Research in Economics, 55(4), 349–358.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, N. (2013). Marital fertility and wealth during the fertility transition: rural France, 1750–1850. The Economic History Review, 66(2), 449–476. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.2012.00666.x.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Festy, P. (1979). La féconfité des pays occidentaux de 1870 à 1970. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. H., & Hof, F. X. (2005). Status seeking in a small open economy. Journal of Macroeconomics, 27(2), 209–232.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Galor, O., Moav, O., & Vollrath, D. (2009). Inequality in land ownership, the emergence of human capital promoting institutions and the great divergence. Review of Economic Studies, 76(1), 143–179.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Guinnane, T. W. (2011). The historical fertility transition: a guide for economists. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(3), 589–614.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kurz, M. (1968). Optimal economic growth and wealth effects. International Economic Review, 9(3), 348–357.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmijoki, U., & Palokangas, T. (2009). Population growth overshooting and trade in developing countries. Journal of Population Economics, 22(1), 43–56.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmijoki, U., & Palokangas, T. (2010). Trade, population growth, and the environment in developing countries. Journal of Population Economics, 23(4), 1351–1373.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. J. (2002). Lectures on economic growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A. (1995). Monitoring the world economy, 1820–1992. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malthus, Th. R. (1798). An essay on the principle of population, as it affects the future improvement of society with remarks on the speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and other writers. London: St. Paul’s Church-Yard. Printed for J. Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razin, A., & Ben-Zion, U. (1975). An intergenerational model of population growth. The American Economic Review, 65(5), 923–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (1st ed., Vol. 1). London: W. Strahan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Finland (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sweden (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, D. R. (1994). New estimates of nuptiality and marital fertility in France, 1740–1911. Population Studies, 48(2), 307–331.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the reviewer for constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulla Lehmijoki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lehmijoki, U., Palokangas, T. (2014). Landowning, Status and Population Growth. In: Moser, E., Semmler, W., Tragler, G., Veliov, V. (eds) Dynamic Optimization in Environmental Economics. Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance, vol 15. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54086-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics