Advertisement

Nephrocalcinosis and Nephrolithiasis

  • Siân PhillipsEmail author
  • Gareth R. Tudor
Chapter
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Abstract

The presence of renal calculi in humans has been identified in mummies discovered as long ago as 4,000 bc, affecting humans for millennia. The underlying aetiology of both nephrocalcinosis and nephrolithiasis is complex. An appreciation of the processes involved in calculus formation aids in the understanding of the diagnosis and management of the disease. The progression of imaging technology has promoted increasingly sensitive and specific techniques in the diagnosis of nephrocalcinosis and nephrolithiasis. Currently, non-contrasted computed tomography has superseded the excretory intravenous urogram in the investigation of acute renal colic because of diagnostic accuracy and ease of application. An understanding of current imaging technology and techniques is necessary to allow its appropriate application in the diagnosis and ongoing management of nephrocalcinosis and nephrolithiasis.

Keywords

Calcium Oxalate Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Renal Calculus Renal Tubular Acidosis Renal Colic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amis ES Jr (1999) Epitaph for the urogram. Radiology 213:639–640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asplin JR, Favus MJ, Coe FL (1996) Nephrolithiasis. In: Brenner BM (ed) The kidney. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1893–1935Google Scholar
  3. Blake SP, McNicholas MM, Raptopoulos V (1998) Non opaque crystal deposition causing ureteric obstruction in patients with HIV undergoing indinavir therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:717–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boll DT, Patil NA, Paulson EK et al (2009) Renal stone assessment with dual-energy multidetector CT and advanced postprocessing techniques: improved characterization of renal stone composition – pilot study. Radiology 250:813–820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boridy IC, Kawashima A, Goldman SM et al (1999) Acute ureterolithiasis: nonenhanced helical CT findings of perinephric oedema for prediction of degree of ureteral obstruction. Radiology 213:663–667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burge HJ, Middleton WD, McClennan BL et al (1991) Ureteral jets in healthy subjects and in patients with unilateral ureteral calculi: comparison with color Doppler US. Radiology 180(2):437–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell SC, Cullinnan JA, Rubens DJ (2004) Slow flow or no flow? Color and power Doppler US pitfalls in the abdomen and pelvis. Radiographics 28:497–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox IH, Erickson SJ, Foley WD et al (1992) Ureteric jets: evaluation of normal flow dynamics with color Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158:1051–1055PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dalla Palma L, Stacul F, Bazzocchi M et al (1993) Ultrasonography and plain film versus intravenous urography in ureteric colic. Clin Radiol 47(5):333–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalla Palma L, Pozzi-Mucelli R, Stacul F (2001) Present-day imaging of patients with renal colic. Eur Radiol 11:4–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deveci S, Co kun M, Tekin M et al (2004) Spiral computed tomography: role in determination of chemical compositions of pure and mixed urinary stones-an in vitro study. Urology 64:237–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan J, Chandhoke PS, Grampas SA (1999) Role of sex hormones in experimental calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:S376–S380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fowler KA, Locken JA, Duchesne JH et al (2002) US for detecting renal calculi with nonenhanced CT as a reference standard. Radiology 222:109–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freeman SJ, Sells S (2008) Investigation of loin pain. Imaging 20:38–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Georgiades CS, Moore CJ, Smith DP (2001) Differences of renal parenchymal attenuation for acutely obstructed and unobstructed kidneys on unenhanced helical CT: a useful secondary sign? AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:325–330Google Scholar
  16. Girish G, Chooi WK, Morocos SK (2004) Filling defect artefacts in magnetic resonance urography. Eur Radiol 14:145–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gleeson MJ, Griffith DP (1993) Struvite calculi. Br J Urol 71:503–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldman SM, Faintuch S, Ajzen SA et al (2004) Diagnostic value of attenuation measurements of the kidney on unenhanced helical CT of obstructive ureterolithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1251–1254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grosjean R, Sauer B, Guerra RM et al (2008) Characterization of human renal stones with MDCT: advantage of dual energy and limitations due to respiratory motion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:720–728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haddad MC, Sharif HS, Shahed MS et al (1992) Renal colic: diagnosis and outcome. Radiology 184:83–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haddad MC, Sharif HS, Abomelha MA et al (1994) Colour Doppler sonography and plain abdominal radiography in the management of patients with renal colic. Eur Radiol 4:529–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamm M, Knopfle E, Wartenberg S et al (2002) Low dose unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of acute flank pain. J Urol 167:1687–1691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hillman BJ, Drach GW, Tracey P et al (1984) Computed tomographic analysis of renal calculi. AJR Am J Roentgenol 142:549–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Joseph P, Mandal AK, Singh KL et al (2002) Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A preliminary study. J Urol 167:1968–1971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kennish SJ, Bhatnagar P, Wah TM et al (2008) Is the KUB radiograph redundant for investigating acute ureteric colic in the non-contrast enhanced computed tomography era? Clin Radiol 63:1131–1135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kluner C, Hein PA, Gralla O et al (2006) Does ultra-low-dose CT with a radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral calculi? J Comput Assist Tomogr 30(1):44–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knöpfle E, Hamm M, Wartenberg S et al (2003) CT in ureterolithiasis with a radiation dose equal to intravenous urography: results in 209 patients. Röfo 175(12):1667–1672PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Levine J, Neitlich J, Smith RC (1999) The value of prone scanning to distinguish ureterovesical junction stones from ureteral stones that have passed into the bladder: leave no stone unturned. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:977–981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mahesh M, Scatarige JC, Cooper J et al (2001) Dose and pitch relationship for a particular multislice CT scanner. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(6):1273–1275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McLeod RD, Churchill DN (1992) Urolithiasis complicating inflammatory bowel disease. J Urol 148:974–978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Meagher T, Sukmar VP, Collingwodd J et al (2001) Low dose computed tomography in suspected acute colic. Clin Radiol 56:873–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Memarsadeghi M, Heinz-Peer G, Helbich TH et al (2005) Unenhanced multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having urinary stone disease: effect of section width on diagnosis. Radiology 235:530–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Menon M, Resnick MI (2002) Urinary lithiasis: etiology, diagnosis, and medical management. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Darracott VE Jr (eds) Campbell’s urology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 3229–3305Google Scholar
  34. Michaels EK, Nakagawa Y, Miura N et al (1994) Racial gender variation in gender frequency of calcium urolithiasis. J Urol 152:2228–2231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Middleton WD, Dodds WJ, Lawson TL et al (1988) Renal calculi: sensitivity for detection with US. Radiology 167:239–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller OF, Kane CJ (2000) Unenhanced helical computed tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Curr Opin Urol 10:123–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mortensen JD, Emmett JL (1954) Nephrocalcinosis: a collective and clinicopathological study. J Urol 71:398–406PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Nakada SY, Douglas GH, Attai S et al (2000) Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting. Urology 55:816–819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Schleipman AR et al (2004) Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography. Radiology 232:126–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Niall O, Russell J, MacGregor R et al (1999) A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain. J Urol 161(2):534–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ozdemir H, Demir MK, Temizöz O et al (2008) Phase inversion harmonic imaging improves assessment of renal calculi: a comparison with fundamental gray-scale sonography. J Clin Ultrasound 36(1):16–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Patel U, Walkden RM, Ghani KR et al (2009) Three-dimensional CT pyelography for planning of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: accuracy of stone measurement, stone depiction and pelvicalyceal reconstruction. Eur Radiol 19:1280–1288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pfister SA, Deckaret A, Laschke S et al (2003) Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain:accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial. Eur Radiol 13:2513–2520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Platt JF (1992) Duplex Doppler evaluation of native kidney dysfunction. Obstructive and nonobstructive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158:1035–1042PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Platt JF (1996) Urinary obstruction. Radiol Clin North Am 34:1113–1129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH (1989a) Distinction between obstructive and non obstructive pyelocaliectasis with Duplex Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 153:997–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH et al (1989b) Duplex Doppler US of the kidney: differentiation of obstructive and nonobstructive dilatation. Radiology 171:515–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH (1993) Acute renal obstruction: evaluation with intrarenal duplex Doppler and conventional US. Radiology 186:685–688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ramello A, Vitale C, Marangella M (2000) Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis. J Nephrol 13(Suppl 3):S65–S70Google Scholar
  50. Rivers K, Shetty S, Menon M (2000) When and how to evaluate a patient with nephrolithiasis. Urol Clin North Am 27:203–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rucker CR, Menias CO, Bhalla S (2004) Mimics of renal colic: alternative diagnoses at unenhanced helical CT. Radiographics 27:S11–S28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sandhu C, Anson KM, Patel U (2003) Urinary tract stones – part I: role of radiological imaging in diagnosis and treatment planning. Clin Radiol 58:415–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Saw KC, McAteer JA, Monga AG et al (2000) Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:329–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scales CD, Curtis LH, Norris R et al (2007) Changing gender prevalence of stone disease. J Urol 177:979–982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scheffel H, Stolzman P, Frauenfelder T et al (2007) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the detection of urinary stone disease. Invest Radiol 42:823–829PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schwartz B, Schenkman N, Armenakas N et al (1999) Imaging characteristics of indinavir calculi. J Urol 161:1085–1087PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Segal AJ, Spataro RF, Linke CA et al (1978) Diagnosis of nonopaque calculi by computed tomography. Radiology 129:447–450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG et al (1997) Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 158:1915–1921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Silverman SG, Leyendecker JR, Amis ES Jr (2009) What is the current role of CT urography and MR urography in the evaluation of the urinary tract? Radiology 250:309–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA et al (1995) Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrasted CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 194:789–794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith RC, Verga M, Dalrymple N et al (1996) Acute ureteral obstruction: value of secondary signs of helical unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167(5):1109–1113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sourtzis S, Thibeau JF, Damry N et al (1999) Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172(6):1491–1494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Spirnak JP, Resnick MI, Banner MP (1990) Calculus disease of the urinary tract. In: Davidson AJ, Hartman D (eds) Radiology of the kidney and urinary tract. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 53–96Google Scholar
  64. Svedström E, Alanen A, Nurmi M (1990) Radiologic diagnosis of renal colic: the role of plain film, excretory urography and sonography. Eur J Radiol 11(3):180–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tack D, Sourtzis S, Dellpierre I et al (2003) Low dose multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:305–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Taourel P, Thuret R, Hoquet MD et al (2008) Computed tomography in the nontraumatic renal causes of acute flank pain. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 29:341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tchelepi H, Ralls PW (2009) Color comet-tail artifact: clinical applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:11–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Teichman JMH (2004) Acute renal colic from ureteral calculus. N Engl J Med 350:684–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomas C, Patschan O, Ketelsen D et al (2009) Dual-energy CT for the characterization of urinary calculi: in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a low-dose scanning protocol. Eur Radiol 19:1553–1559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Townsend BA, Silverman SG, Mortele KJ et al (2009) Current use of computed tomographic urography: survey of the Society of Uroradiology. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33:96–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Traubici J, Neitlich JD, Smith RC (1999) Distinguishing pelvic phleboliths from distal ureteral stones on routine unenhanced helical CT: is there a radiolucent center? AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:13–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tublin ME, Dodd GD 3rd, Verdile VP (1994) Acute renal colic: diagnosis with duplex Doppler US. Radiology 193:697–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wrong OM, Feest TG (1976) Nephrocalcinosis. In: Peters DK (ed) Advanced medicine no 12. Pitman Medical, London, pp 394–406Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyPrincess of Wales Hospital, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health BoardBridgendWales, UK

Personalised recommendations