Advertisement

Dog Breeds and Their Behavior

Chapter

Abstract

Domestic dogs display an extraordinary level of phenotypic diversity in morphology and behavior. Furthermore, due to breeding practices introduced during the nineteenth century, these phenotypic traits have become relatively ‘fixed’ within breeds, allowing biologists to obtain unique insights regarding the genetic bases of behavioral diversity, and the effects of domestication and artificial selection on temperament. Here we explore differences in behavior among the 30 most popular dog breeds registered with the American Kennel Club based on owner responses to a standardized and validated behavioral questionnaire (C-BARQ©). The findings indicate that some breed-associated temperament traits (e.g. fear/anxiety) may be linked to specific gene mutations, while others may represent more general behavioral legacies of ‘ancient’ ancestry, physical deformity, and/or human selection for specific functional abilities. They also suggest that previous efforts to relate dog breed popularity to behavior may have failed due to the confounding effects of body size.

Keywords

Labrador Retriever Breed Difference Cocker Spaniel Standard Poodle Cavalier King Charles Spaniel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barnard, S., Siracusa, C., Reisner, I., Valsecchi, P., & Serpell, J. A. (2012). Validity of model devices used to assess canine temperament in behavioral tests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 138, 79–87.Google Scholar
  2. Boyko, A. R., Quignon, P., Li, L., et al. (2010). A simple genetic architecture underlies morphological variation in dogs. PLoS Biology, 8, e1000451.Google Scholar
  3. Bradshaw, J. W. S., & Goodwin, D. (1998). Determination of behavioural traits of pure-bred dogs using factor analysis and cluster analysis; a comparison of studies in the USA and UK. Research in Veterinary Science, 66, 73–76.Google Scholar
  4. Clutton-Brock, J. (1995). Origins of the dog: Domestication and early history. In J. Serpell (Ed.), The domestic dog, its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people (pp. 8–20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Coppinger, R., & Schneider, R. (1995). Evolution of working dogs. In J Serpell (Ed.), Domestic dog, its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people (pp. 22–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. De Meester, R., De Bacquer, D., Peremens, K., Vermeire, S., Planta, D. J., Coopman, F., et al. (2008). A preliminary study on the use of the socially acceptable behaviour test as a test for shyness/confidence in the temperament of dogs. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 3, 161–170.Google Scholar
  7. Duffy, D. L., Hsu, Y., & Serpell, J. A. (2008). Breed differences in canine aggression. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 114, 441–460.Google Scholar
  8. Duffy, D. L., & Serpell, J. A. (2012). Predictive validity of a method for evaluating temperament in young guide and service dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 138, 99–109.Google Scholar
  9. Eigenmann, J. E., Patterson, D. F., Zapf, J., & Froesch, E. R. (1984). Insulin-like growth factor I in the dog: A study in different dog breeds and in dogs with growth hormone elevation. Acta Endocrinology, 105, 294–301.Google Scholar
  10. Euromonitor International. (2013). Passport global market information database, Retrieved September 11 2013.Google Scholar
  11. Ghirlanda, S., Acerbi, A., Herzog, H., & Serpell, J. A. (2013). Fashion vs. function in cultural evolution: The case of dog breed popularity. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e74770.Google Scholar
  12. Goddard, M. E., & Beilharz, R. G. (19820. Genetic and environmental factors affecting the suitability of dogs as guide dogs for the blind. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 62, 97–102.Google Scholar
  13. Gray, M. M., Sutter, N. B., Ostrander, E. A., & Wayne, R. K. (2010). The IGF1 small dog haplotype is derived from middle eastern gray wolves. BMC Biology, 8, 16.Google Scholar
  14. Guler, H-P., Binz, K., Eigenmann, E., Jaggi, S., Zimmermann, D., Zapf, J., & Froesch, E. R. (1989). Small stature and insulin-like growth factors: Prolonged treatment of mini-poodles with recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I. Endocrinologica (Copen.), 121, 456–464.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, N. J., & Wynne, C. D. (2012). The canid genome: Behavioral geneticists’ best friend? Genes Brain and Behavior, 11, 889–902.Google Scholar
  16. Hart, B., & Hart, L., (1985). Selecting pet dogs on the basis of cluster-analysis of breed behavior profiles and gender. JAVMA, 186, 1181–1185.Google Scholar
  17. Hart, B., & Miller, M. F. (1985). Behavioral profiles of dog breeds. JAVMA, 186, 1175–1180.Google Scholar
  18. Herzog, H. (2006). Forty-two thousand and one Dalmatians: Fads, social contagion, and dog breed popularity. Society and Animals, 14, 383–397.Google Scholar
  19. Hsu, Y., & Serpell, J. A. (2003). Development and validation of a questionnaire for measuring behavior and temperament traits in pet dogs. JAVMA, 223, 1293–1300.Google Scholar
  20. Hsu, Y., & Sun, L. (2010). Factors associated with aggressive responses in pet dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 123, 108–123.Google Scholar
  21. Jakuba, T., Polcova, Z., Fedakova, D., Kottferova, J., Marekova, J., Fejsakova, M., et al. (2013). Differences in evaluation of a dog’s temperament by individual members of the same household. Society and Animals, 21, 582–589.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, A. C., & Gosling, S. D. (2005). Temperament and personality in dogs (Canis familiaris): A review and evaluation of past research. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 95, 1–53.Google Scholar
  23. Jones, P., Chase, K., Martin, A., Davern, P. Ostrander, E. A., & Lark, K. G. (2008). Single-nucleotide-polymorphism-based association mapping of dog stereotypes. Genetics, 179, 1033–1044.Google Scholar
  24. Larson, G., Karlsson, E. K., Perri, A., et al. (2012). Rethinking dog domestication by integrating genetics, archeology, and biogeography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109, 8878–8883.Google Scholar
  25. Ley, J. M., Bennett, P. M., & Coleman, G. J. (2009). A refinement and validation of the Monash Canine Personality Questionnaire (MCPQ). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116, 220–227.Google Scholar
  26. Liinamo, A-E., van den Berg, L., Leegwater, P. A. J., et al. (2007). Genetic variation in aggression-related traits in golden retriever dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 104, 95–106.Google Scholar
  27. Martin, P., & Bateson, P. P. G. B. (1993). Measuring behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. MacKenzie, S. A., Oltenacu, E. A. B., & Houpt, K. A. (1986). Canine behavioral genetics—a review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 15, 365–393.Google Scholar
  29. McGreevy, P., Georgevsky, D., Carrasco, J., Valanzuela, M., Duffy, D. L., & Serpell, J. A. (2013). Dog behavior co-varies with height, bodyweight and skull shape. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e80529.Google Scholar
  30. Nagasawa, M., Tsujimura, A., Tateishi, K., Mogi, K., Ohta, M., Serpell, J. A., & Kikusui, T. (2011). Assessment of the factorial structure of the C-BARQ in Japan. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science , 73, 869–875.Google Scholar
  31. Notari, L., & Goodwin, D. (2007). A survey of behavioural characteristics of pure-bred dogs in Italy. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 103, 118–130.Google Scholar
  32. Ostrander, E. A. (2007). Genetics and the shape of dogs. American Scientific, 95, 406–413.Google Scholar
  33. Ostrander, E. A., & Galibert, F. (2006). Forward. In E. A. Ostrander, U. Giger & K. Lindblad-Toh (Eds.), The dog and its genome (pp. xiii-xix). Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
  34. Parker, H. G., Kim, L. V., Sutter, N. B. et al. (2004). Genetic structure of the purebred domestic dog. Science, 304, 1160–1164.Google Scholar
  35. Pérez-Guisado, J., Lopez-Rodríguez, R., & Munoz-Serrano, A. (2006). Heritability of dominant-aggressive behaviour in English Cocker Spaniels. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 100, 219–227.Google Scholar
  36. Ritvo, H. (1987). The animal estate: English and other creatures in the Victoria age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Saetre, P., Strandberg, E., Sundgren, P-E., Pettersson, U., Jazin, E., & Bergström. (2006). The genetic contribution to canine personality. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 5, 240–248.Google Scholar
  38. Sampson, J., & Binns, M. M. (2006). The Kennel club and the early history of dog shows and breed clubs. In E. A. Ostrander, U. Giger & K. Lindblad-Toh (Eds.), The dog and Iis genome (pp. 19–30). Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
  39. Scott, J. P., & Bielfelt, S. W. (1976). Analysis of the puppy testing program. In C. J. Pfaffenberger, J. P. Scott, J. L. Fuller, B. E. Ginsburg & S. W. Bielfelt (Eds.), Guide dogs for the blind: Their selection, development and training (pp. 39–75). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  40. Scott, J. P., & Fuller, J. L. (1965). Genetics and the social behavior of the dog. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Serpell, J. A. (1987). The influence of inheritance and environment of canine behaviour: Myth and fact. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 22, 949–766.Google Scholar
  42. Serpell, J. A. (1995). The hair of the dog. In J. A. Serpell (Ed.), The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people (pp. 258–264). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Serpell, J. A., & Hsu Y. (2001). Development and validation of a novel method for evaluating behavior and temperament in guide dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 72, 347–364.Google Scholar
  44. Serpell, J. A., & Hsu, Y. (2005). Effects of breed, sex, and neuter status on trainability in dogs. Anthrozoös, 18, 196–207.Google Scholar
  45. Spady, T. C., & Ostrander, E. A. (2008). Canine behavioral genetics: Pointing out the phenotypes and herding up the genes. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 82, 10–18.Google Scholar
  46. Sutter, N. B., Bustamante, C. D., Chase, K., et al. (2007). A single IGF1 allele is a major determinant of small size in dogs. Science, 316, 112–115.Google Scholar
  47. Svartberg, K. (2005). A comparison of behaviour in test and in everyday life: Evidence of three consistent boldness-related personality traits in dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 91, 103–128.Google Scholar
  48. Svartberg, K. (2006). Breed-typical behavior in dogs—historical remnants or recent constructs? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 96, 293–313.Google Scholar
  49. Svartberg, K., & Forkman, B. (2002). Personality traits in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 79, 133–155.Google Scholar
  50. Takeuchi, Y., & Mori, Y. (2006). A comparison of the behavioral profiles of purebred dogs in Japan to profiles of those in the United States and the United Kingdom. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 68, 789–796.Google Scholar
  51. Thalman, O., Shapiro, B., Cui, P., et al. (2013). Complete mitochondrial genomes of ancient canids suggest a European origin of domestic dogs. Science, 342, 871–874.Google Scholar
  52. Trut, L., Oskina, I., & Kharlamova, A. (2009). Animal evolution during domestication: The domesticated fox as a model. Bioessays, 31, 349–360.Google Scholar
  53. Turcsán, B., Kubinyi, E., & Miklósi, A. (2011). Trainability and boldness traits differ between dog breed clusters based on conventional breed categories and genetic relatedness. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 132, 61–70.Google Scholar
  54. Uhde, T. W., Malloy, L. C., & Slate, S. O. (1992). Fearful behavior, body size, and serum IGF-I levels in nervous and normal pointer dogs. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 43, 263–269.Google Scholar
  55. van den Berg, L., Schilder, M. B. H., de Vries, H., Leegwater, P. A. J., & van Oost, B. A. (2006). Phenotyping of aggressive behavior in golden retriever dogs with a questionnaire. Behavior Genetics, 36, 882–902.Google Scholar
  56. van den Berg, S. M., Heuven, H. C. M., Van den Berg, L., Duffy, D. L., & Serpell, J. A. (2010). Evaluation of the C-BARQ as a measure of stranger-directed aggression in three common dog breeds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 124,136–141.Google Scholar
  57. Vaysse, A., Ratnakumar, A., & Derrien, T. et al. (2011). Identification of genomic regions associated with phenotypic variation between dog breeds using selection mapping. PLOS Genetics, 7, e1002316.Google Scholar
  58. Vermeire, S. T., Audenaert, K. R., & De Meester, R. H. et al. (2011). Neuro-imaging the serotonin 2A receptor as a valid biomarker for canine behavioral disorders. Research in Veterinary Science, 91, 465–472.Google Scholar
  59. Vermeire, S. T., Audenaert, K. R., & De Meester, R. H. et al. (2012). Serotonin 2A receptor, serotonin transporter and dopamine transporter alterations in dogs with compulsive behavior as a promising model for human obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatric Research, 201, 78–87.Google Scholar
  60. Willis, M. B. (1995). Genetics of dog behaviour with particular reference to working dogs. In Serpell J (ed), The domestic dog, its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people (pp. 51–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Wilsson, E., & Sundgren, P-E. (1998). Behaviour test for eight-week old puppies—heritabilities of tested behaviour traits and its correspondence to later behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 58, 151–162.Google Scholar
  62. Young, A., & Bannasch, D. (2006). Morphological variation in the dog. In E. A. Ostrander, U. Giger, K. Lindblad-Toh (Eds.), The dog and its genome (pp. 47–65). Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the Interaction of Animals and Society, School of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations