In this chapter we attempt to put the dog back at the heart of dog cognition studies. We identify that the majority of dogs are not first-world pets, dependent on their owners for the fulfillment of all essential needs, and acting as their “best friends.” Rather most dogs are scavengers on the periphery of people’s lives. These dogs are more likely to avoid human contact than seek it. The sensitivity of pet dogs to human actions and intentions that has been a major focus of recent research is unlikely to be a special adaptation or case of co-evolution, but rather is the expression of basic processes of conditioning as well as social and biological traits that domesticated and wild canids share. In individuals that have been socialized to humans and rendered completely dependent on them these processes lead to high levels of sensitivity to human actions. The fundamental differences between dog and wolf behavior lie at more basic levels: in the processes of socialization, in foraging, and in reproduction. Small but crucial intertwined changes led to an animal that is (1) more promiscuous than any other canid, (2) can reproduce more rapidly, and (3) is a much less effective hunter but (4) more efficient scavenger than other canids. The indirect consequences of these changes include the fact that we have dogs and not wolves resting at our feet. Though it may be a little less flattering to the human species, we believe this perspective on dogs is at least as fascinating and closer to the historical truth than the story that humans created dogs.
- Critical Period
- Conditioned Reinforcer
- Gesture Type
- Wild Canid
- Fence Barrier
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
APPMA. (2008). Industry statistics and trends. American Pet Products Manufacturers Association. Retrieved from http://www.appma.org
Barrera, G., Jakovcevic, G., Elgier, A. M., Mustaca, A., et al. (2010). Responses of shelter and pet dogs to an unknown human. Journal of Veterinary Behaviour, 5, 339–344.
Beck, A. M. (1973). The Ecology of Stray Dogs: A Study of Free-ranging Urban Animals. Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
Bensky, M. K., Gosling, S. D., & Sinn, D. L. (2013). The world from a dog’s view: A comprehensive review of dog cognition research. In H. J. Brockmann (Ed.), Advances in the study of behavior, Vol 45, Amsterdam: Academic Press.
Bentosela, M., Barrera, G., Jakovcevic, A., Elgier, A. M., & Mustaca, A. E. (2008). Effect of reinforcement, reinforcer omission and extinction on a communicative response in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Behavioural Processes, 78, 464–469.
Berman, M., & Dunbar, I. (1983). The social behaviour of free-ranging suburban dogs. Applied Animal Ethology, 10, 5–17.
Boitani, L., & Ciucci, P. (1995). Comparative social ecology of feral dogs and wolves. Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 7, 49–72.
Boitani, L., Francisci, F., Ciucci, P., & Andreoli, G. (1995). Population biology and ecology of feral dogs in central Italy. In J. Serpell (Ed.) The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour, and interactions with people. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bräuer, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2004). Visual perspective taking in dogs (Canis familiaris) in the presence of barriers. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 88, 299–317.
Call, J., Bräuer, J, Kaminski, J., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 257–263.
Cooper, J.J ., Ashton, C., Bishop, S., West, R., Mills, D.S., & Young, R.J. (2003). Clever hounds: Social cognition in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 81, 229–244.
Coppinger, R., & Coppinger, L. (2001). Dogs: A startling new understanding of canine origin, behavior and evolution. New York: Scribner.
Daniels, T. J. (1983). The social organization of free-ranging urban dogs: Non-estrous social behavior. Applied Animal Ethology, 10, 341–363.
Daniels, T. J., & Bekoff, M. (1989). Population and social biology of free-ranging dogs, Canis familiaris. Journal of Mammalogy, 70, 754.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: John Murray.
Elgier, A. M., Jakovcevic, A., Mustaca, A. E., & Bentosela, M. (2009). Learning and owner-stranger effects on interspecific communication in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Behavioural Processes, 81, 44–49.
Elliott, O., & King, J. A. (1960). Effect of early food deprivation upon later consummatory behavior in puppies. Psychological Reports, 6, 391–400.
Fentress, J. C. (1967). Observations on the behavioral development of a hand-reared male timber wolf. American Zoologist, 7, 339–351.
Feuerbacher, E. N., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2011). A history of dogs as subjects in North American experimental psychological research. Comparative Cognition and Behaviour Reviews, 6, 46–71.
Feuerbacher, E. N., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2012). Relative efficacy of human social interaction and food as reinforcers for domestic dogs and hand-reared wolves. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 98, 105–129.
Feuerbacher, E. N. & Wynne, C. D. L. (in prep). Most domestic dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) prefer food to petting: Population differences and schedule effects in concurrent choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.
Feuerbacher, E. N. & Wynne, C. D. L. (in prep). Domestic dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) preference for human social interaction in a single-alternative choice.
Fonberg, E., Kostarczyk, E., Prechtl, J. (1981). Training of instrumental responses in dogs socially reinforced by humans. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Sciences, 16, 183–193.
Fox, M. W. (1964). The ontogeny of behaviour and neurologic responses in the dog. Animal Behaviour, 12, 301–310.
Frank, H., & Frank, M. G. (1982). On the effects of domestication on canine social development and behavior. Applied Animal Ethology, 8, 507–525.
Frank, H., & Frank, M. (1987). The University of Michigan canine information-processing project 1979–1981, In H. Frank (Ed.) Man and wolf: Advances, issues, and problems in captive wolf and wolf-poodle hybrids. Dordrecht: W. Junk Publishers.
Frank, H., Hasselbach, L. M., & Littleton, D. M. (1987). Socialized vs. unsocialized wolves (Canis lupus) in experimental research. In M. W. Fox & L. D. Mickley (Eds.) Advances in animal welfare science (pp. 33–49). New York: Springer.
Freedman, D. G., King, J. A., & Elliot, O. (1960). Critical period in the social development of dogs. Science, 133, 1016–1017.
Fukuzawa, M., & Hayashi, N. (2013). Comparison of 3 different reinforcements of learning in dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 8(4), 221–224.
Gácsi, M., Miklósi, Á., Varga, O., Topal, J., & Csanyi, V. (2004). Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human’s attention. Animal Cognition, 7, 144–153.
Gácsi, M., Gyóri, B., Miklósi, A., Virányi, Z., Kubinyi, E., Topál, J., et al. (2005). Species-specific differences and similarities in the behavior of hand-raised dog and wolf pups in social situations with humans. Developmental Psychobiology, 47, 111–122.
Gácsi, M., Gyori, B., Viranyi, Z., Kubinyi, E., Range, F., Belenyi, B., et al. (2009a). Explaining dog wolf differences in utilizing human pointing gestures: Selection for synergistic shifts in the development of some social skills. PLoS ONE, 4(8), e6584.
Gácsi, M., Kara, E., Belenyi, B., Topal, J., & Miklósi, Á. (2009b). The effect of development and individual differences in pointing comprehension of dogs. Animal Cognition, 12, 471–479.
Gantt, W. H., Newton, J. E. O., Royer, F. L., et al. (1966). Effect of person. Conditioned Reflex, 1, 146–160.
Gilchrist, J., Sacks, J. J., White, D., & Kresnow, M.-J. (2008). Dog bites: Still a problem? Injury Prevention, 14, 296–301.
Gipson, P. S., Gipson, I. K., & Sealander, J. A. (1975). Reproductive biology of wild Canis (Canidae) in Arkansas. Journal of Mammalogy, 56, 605–612.
Giret, N., Miklósi, Á., Kreutzer, M., & Bovet, D. (2008). Use of experimenter-given cues by African gray parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Animal Cognition,12, 1–10.
Giret, N., Miklósi, Á., Kreutzer, M., & Bovet, D. (2009). Use of experimenter-given cues by African gray parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Animal Cognition, 12(1), 1–10.
Ghosh, B., Choudhuri, D. K., & Pal, B. (1984/85). Some aspects of the sexual behaviour of stray dogs, Canis familiaris. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 13, 113–127.
Hall, N. J., Udell, M. A. R., Dorey, N. R., Walsh, A. L., & Wynne, C. D. L (2011). Megachiropteran bats (Pteropus) utilize human referential stimuli to locate hidden food. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125, 341–346.
Hare B., Brown, M., Williamson, C., & Tomasello, M. (2002). The Domestication of Social Cognition in Dogs. Science, 298, 1634–1636.
Hare, B., Plyusnina, I., Ignacio, N., Schepina, O., Stepika, A., Wrangham, R., et al. (2005). Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Current Biology, 15, 226–230.
Hare, B., & Woods, V. (2013). The genius of dogs. New York: Dutton.
Harlow, H. F., & Zimmerman, R. R. (1959). Affectional responses in the infant monkey. Science, 130, 421–432.
Horowitz, A. (2012). Fair is fine, but more is better: Limits to inequity aversion in the domestic dog. Social Justice Research, 25, 195–212.
Harrington, F. H., Paquet, P. C., Ryon, J., & Fentress, J. C. (1982). Monogamy in wolves: A review of the evidence. In F.H. Harrington and P.C. Paquet (Eds.), Wolves of the world (pp. 209–222). New Jersey: Noyes Publications.
Igel, G. J., & Calvin, A. D. (1960). The development of affectional responses in infant dogs. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 53, 302–205.
Klinghammer, E., & Goodmann, P. A. (1987). Socialization and management of wolves in captivity. In H. Frank (Ed.) Man and wolf: Advances, issues, and problems in captive wolf research. Dordrecht: W. Junk.
Kuhne, F., Hößler, J. C., & Struwe, R. (2012). Effects of human-dog familiarity on dogs’ behavioural responses to petting. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 142, 176–181.
Laveaux, J. C., & King of Prussia, F. (1789). The life of Frederick the Second, King of Prussia: To which are Added Observations, Authentic Documents, and a Variety of Anecdotes. London: J. Derbett.
Lord, K. (2013). A comparison of the sensory development of wolves (Canis lupus lupus) and dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). Ethology, 119, 110–120.
Lord, K., Feinstein, M., Smith, B., & Coppinger, C. (2013). Variation in reproductive traits of members of the genus Canis with special attention to the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Behavioural Processes, 92, 131–142.
Lynch, J. J., & Gantt, H. W. (1968). The heart rate component of the social reflex in dogs: The conditional effects of petting and person. Conditioned Reflex, 3, 69–80.
Lynch, J. J. (1987). W. Horsley Gantt’s effect of person. In F.J. McGuigan & T. A. Ban (Eds.) Critical issues in psychology, psychiatry, and physiology: A memorial to W. Horsley Gantt, (pp 93–106). Amsterdam: Gordon and Beach.
Macdonald, D. W., & Carr, G. M., (1995). Variation in dog society: Between resource dispersion and social flux. In J. Serpell, (Ed.) The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour, and interactions with people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McIntire, R., & Colley, T. A. (1967). Social reinforcement in the dog. Psychological Reports, 20, 843–846.
Mech, L. D., Wolf, P. C., & Packard, J. M. (1999). Regurgitative food transfer among wild wolves. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77, 1192–1195.
Mech, L. D. (1970). The wolf: The ecology and behavior of an endangered species. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.
Miklósi, Á., Kubinyi, E., Topál, J., Gácsi, M., Virányi, Z., & Csányi, V. (2003). A simple reason for a big difference: Wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Current Biology, 13, 763–766.
Miklósi, Á., Polgárdi, R., Topál, J., & Csányi, V. (1998). Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Animal Cogition, 1, 113–121.
Miklósi, Á., Polgárdi, R., Topál, J., & Csányi, V. (2000). Intentional behaviour in dog-human communication: An experimental analysis of “showing” behaviour in the dog. Animal Cognition, 3, 159–166.
Miklósi, Á., & Soproni, K. (2006). A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Animal Cognition, 9, 81–93.
Miklosi, A. (2009). Dog behaviour, evolution, and cognition (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Odendaal, J. S .J., & Meintjes, R. A. (2003). Neurophysiological correlates of affiliative behavior between humans and dogs. Veterinary Journal, 165, 296–301.
Ortolani, A., Vernooij, H., & Coppinger, R. (2009). Ethiopian village dogs: Behavioural responses to a stranger’s approach. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 119, 210–218.
Pack, A. A., & Herman, L. M. (2004). Bottlenosed dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) comprehend the referent of both static and dynamic human gazing and pointing in an object-choice task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 160–171.
Packard, J. M. (2003). Wolf behavior: Reproductive, social, and intelligent. In D. Mech, & L. Boitani (Eds.) Wolves: Behavior, ecology, and conservation (pp. 35–65). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Pal, S. K. (2008). Maturation and development of social behaviour during early ontogeny in free-ranging dog puppies in West Bengal, India. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 111, 95–107.
Pal, S. K., Ghosh, B., & Roy, S. (1998.) Agonistic behaviour of free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris) in relation to season, sex and age. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 59, 331–348.
Pavlov, I. P. (1928). Lectures on conditioned reflexes (trans Gantt WH). New York: International.
Pilley, J. W., & Reid, A. K. (2011). Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents. Behavioural Processes, 86, 184–195.
Pongracz, P., Miklosi, A., Kubinyi, E., Gurobi, K., Topall, J., & Csanyi, V. (2001). Social learning in dogs: The effect of a human demonstrator on the performance of dogs in a detour task. Animal Behaviour, 62(6), 1109–1117.
Range, F., & Virányi, Z. (2011). Development of gaze following abilities in wolves (Canis lupus). PloS One, 6(2), e16888.
Reid, P. J. (2009). Adapting to the human world: Dogs’ responsiveness to our social cues. Behavioural Processes, 80, 325–333.
Rheingold, H. L. (1963). Maternal behavior in the dog. In H.L. Rheingold (Ed.), Maternal behavior in mammals (pp. 169–202). New York: Wiley.
Riedel, J., Schumann, K., Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). The early ontogeny of human-dog communication. Animal Behaviour, 75, 1003–1014.
Scheumann, M., & Call, J. (2004). The use of experimenter-given cues by South African fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus). Animal Cognition, 7, 224–230.
Schleidt, W., & Schalter, M. (2003). Co-evolution of humans and canids: An alternative view of dog domestication: Homo Homini Lupus? Evolution & Cognition, 9, 57–72.
Schloegl, C., Kotrschal, K., & Bugnyar, T. (2007). Do common ravens (Corvus corax) rely on human or conspecific gaze cues to detect hidden food? Animal Cognition, 11, 231–241.
Schloegl, C., Kotrschal, K., & Bugnyar, T. (2008). Modifying the object-choice task: Is the way you look important for ravens? Behavioural Processes, 77(1), 61–65.
Scott, J. P., & Fuller, J. L. (1965). Genetics and the social behavior of the dog. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Soproni, K., Miklósi, A., Topál, J., & Csányi, V. (2001). Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 122–126.
Soproni, K., Miklósi, A., Topál, J., & Csányi, V. (2002). Dogs’ (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 116, 27–34.
Smet, A.F., & Byrne, R.W. (2013). African elephants can use human pointing cues to find hidden food. Current Biology, 23, 2033–2037.
Topál, J., Gácsi, M., Miklósi, Á., Virányi, Z., Kubinyi, E., & Csányi,V. (2005). Attachment to humans: A comparative study on hand-reared wolves and differently socialized dog puppies. Animal Behaviour, 70, 1367–1375.
Topál, J., Byrne, R. W., Miklósi, Á., & Csányi, V. (2006). Reproducing human actions and action sequences: Do as I do! in a dog. Animal Cognition, 9(4), 355–367.
Udell, M. A. R, Dorey, N. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2008a). Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Animal Behaviour, 76, 1767–1773.
Udell, M. A. R, Dorey, N. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2010a). What did domestication do to dogs? A new account of dogs’ sensitivity to C.D.L actions. Biological Reviews, 85, 327–345.
Udell, M. A. R, Dorey, N. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2010b). The performance of stray dogs (Canis familiaris) living in a shelter on human-guided object-choice tasks. Animal Behaviour, 79, 717–725.
Udell, M. A. R, Dorey, N. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2011). Can your dog read your mind? Understanding the causes of canine perspective taking. Learning & Behavior, 39, 289–302.
Udell, M. A. R, Giglio, R. F., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2008b). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human gestures but not nonhuman tokens to find hidden food. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 122, 84–93.
Udell, M. A. R, Hall, N. J., Morrison, J., Dorey, N. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2013). Point topography and within-session learning are important predictors of pet dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) performance on human guided tasks. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 5, 3–20.
Udell, M. A. R, Spencer, J. M., Dorey, N. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2012). Human-socialized wolves follow diverse human gestures… and they may not be alone. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 25, 97–117.
Udell, M. A. R, & Wynne, C. D. L. (2008). A review of domestic dogs’ (Canis familiaris) human-like behaviors: Or why behavior analysts should stop worrying and love their dogs. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 247–261.
Udell, M. A. R, & Wynne, C. D. L (2010). Ontogeny and phylogeny: Both are essential to human-sensitive behaviour in the genus Canis. Animal Behaviour, 79, e9–e14.
Virányi, Z., Gácsi, M., Kubinyi, E., Topál, J., Belényi, B., Ujfalussy, et al. (2008). Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Animal Cognition, 11, 373–387.
Von Bayern, A. M. P., & Emery,. N. J. (2009). Jackdaws respond to human attentional states and communicative cues in different contexts. Current Biology, 19, 602–606.
World Health Organisation (2005). WHO expert consultation on rabies: First report. WHO Technical Report Series, 931. World Health Organisation. Geneva Switzerland.
Zimen, E. (1987) Ontogeny of approach and flight behavior toward humans in wolves, poodles and wolf-poodle hybrids. In H. Frank (Ed.), Man and wolf (pp. 275–292). Dordrecht: W. Junk Publishers.
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Udell, M.A., Lord, K., Feuerbacher, E.N., Wynne, C.D. (2014). A Dog’s-Eye View of Canine Cognition. In: Horowitz, A. (eds) Domestic Dog Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53994-7_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53993-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-53994-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)