Advertisement

Modelling Care Pathways in a Connected Health Setting

  • Padraig O’Leary
  • Patrick Buckley
  • Ita Richardson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8315)

Abstract

Connected Health involves the use of ICT to improve healthcare quality and outcomes. In a connected heath environment, stakeholders can struggle to make best use of this information coming from a variety of sources. Given this, we are investigating the challenge of how to use available information to make informed decisions about the care pathway which the patient should follow to ensure that prevention and treatment services are efficient and effective. In this paper, we outline our research into care pathway and information modelling in a Connected Health setting. The research is currently underway, and follows a series of stages using sources in industry and academia. In this paper, we present an overview of the project work packages including an explanation on how the different stages of the research form a continuum in which the developed models will be continually adjusted. We describe how empirical evidence will be used in the development of the models through following an evolutionary multi-method research approach.

Keywords

Healthcare Professional Care Pathway Health Information System Software Product Line Healthcare Information System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    AIOM: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10027&page=170
  2. 2.
    Caulfield, B.M., Donnelly, S.C.: What is Connected Health and why will it change your practice? Qjm Mon. J. Assoc. Physicians (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gooch, P., Roudsari, A.: Computerization of workflows, guidelines, and care pathways: a review of implementation challenges for process-oriented health in-formation systems. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bennett, S., McRobb, S., Farmer, R.: Object-oriented Systems Analysis and Design Using UML 2/e. McGraw-Hill Education (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shelly, G.B., Rosenblatt, H.J.: Systems Analysis and Design. Cengage Learning (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hicheur, A., Ben Dhieb, A., Barkaoui, K.: Modelling and Analysis of Flexible Healthcare Processes Based on Algebraic and Recursive Petri Nets. In: Weber, J., Perseil, I. (eds.) FHIES 2012. LNCS, vol. 7789, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    OMG Unified Modeling LanguageTM (OMG UML), http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.4.1/
  9. 9.
    Noll, J., Scacchi, W.: Specifying process-oriented hypertext for organizational computing. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 24, 39–61 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Atkinson, D.C., Noll, J.: Automated validation and verification of process models. In: Proceedings of the 7th IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kurt, J.: Coloured Petri Nets: Basic Concepts, Analysis Methods and Practical Use. Springer (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wise, A.: Little-JIL 1.5 Language Report. Department of Computer Science. University of Massachusetts (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’Leary, P., Buckley, P., Richardson, I.: Modelling Care Pathways in a Con-nected Health Setting. Presented at the Third International Symposium on Foundations of Health Information Engineering and Systems, Macau (August 21, 2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Leary, P., de Almeida, E.S., Richardson, I.: The Pro-PD Process Model for Product Derivation within software product lines. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54, 1014–1028 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Leary, P., Richardson, I.: Process reference model construction: implementing an evolutionary multi-method research approach. Iet Softw. 6, 423–430 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morse, J.M., Niehaus, L.: Mixed method design: principles and procedures. Left Coast Press (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wood, M., Daly, J., Miller, J., Roper, M.: Multi-method research: An empirical investigation of object-oriented technology. J. Syst. Softw. 48, 13–26 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Reference modeling for business systems analysis. Idea Group Inc., IGI (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes. Springer Publishing Company (2011) (incorporated)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Richardson, I., Shroff, V.: Software Quality Plan for TRANSFoRm (2011), http://www.transformproject.eu/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Padraig O’Leary
    • 1
    • 2
  • Patrick Buckley
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ita Richardson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.ARCH – Applied Research for Connected HealthUniversity of LimerickIreland
  2. 2.Lero – the Irish Software Engineering Research CentreUniversity of LimerickIreland
  3. 3.Kemmy Business SchoolUniversity of LimerickIreland

Personalised recommendations