Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Allgemeine Psychologie pp 821–837Cite as

Handlung und Wahrnehmung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Die Allgemeine Psychologie hat Wahrnehmung und Handlung lange Zeit getrennt voneinander betrachtet. Das ist zum einen das Ergebnis einer fast unvermeidlichen Arbeitsteilung unter Wissenschaftlern. Andererseits liegt es aber auch an bestimmten Modellvorstellungen, die davon ausgehen, dass Wahrnehmung und Handlungssteuerung unabhängig voneinander operieren. Wahrnehmung macht aber nur Sinn, wenn sie der Handlungskontrolle dient. Umgekehrt dienen Handlungen dazu, bestimmte Wahrnehmungen zu erzeugen. Diese Überlegungen führen zu theoretischen Konzepten, die eine strikte Trennung von Wahrnehmung und Handlung aufgeben.

Schlüsselwörter: Handlung; Stadienmodell; Reiz-Reaktions-Kompatibilität; Zwei-Pfade-Modell; Unbewusste Bahnung; Ideomotorik

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Aglioti, S., Desouza, J. F. X., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679–685.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365–377.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ansorge, U., Kunde, W., & Kiefer, M. (2014). Unconscious vision and executive control: How unconscious processing and conscious action control interact. Consciousness and Cognition, 27(27), 268–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J. (1993). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baess, P., Horváth, J., Jacobsen, T., & Schröger, E. (2011). Selective suppression of self-initiated sounds in an auditory stream: an ERP study. Psychophysiology, 48, 1276–1283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhalla, M., & Proffitt, D. R. (1999). Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 1076–1096.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, S. J., Wolpert, D., & Frith, C. (2000). Why can’t you tickle yourself. Neuroreport, 11, 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, M., Bekkering, H., & Prinz, W. (2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta psychologica, 106(1), 3–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, N., & Franz, V. H. (2009). When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1421–1433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso-Leite, P., Mamassian, P., Schutz-Bosbach, S., & Waszak, F. (2010). A New Look at Sensory Attenuation: Action-Effect Anticipation Affects Sensitivity, Not Response Bias. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1740–1745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Proctor, R. W. (2013). Response-effect compatibility defines the natural scrolling direction. Human Factors, 55, 1112–1129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston, MA: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec, H. G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Le Bihan, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desantis, A., Roussel, C., & Waszak, F. (2014). The temporal dynamics of the perceptual consequences of action-effect prediction. Cognition, 132(3), 243–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1664). Über den Menschen.Lateinische Erstausgabe. Lugdunum Batavorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dignath, D., Pfister, R., Eder, A. B., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2014). Representing the hyphen in action-effect associations: Automatic acquisition and bidirectional retrieval of action-effect intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 40, 1701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donders, F. C. (1868). On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychologica, 30, 412–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eder, A. B., Rothermund, K., De Houwer, J., & Hommel, B. (2014). Directive and incentive functions of affective action consequences: An ideomotor approach. Psychological Research, 79, 630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Effenberg, A. O., & Mechling, H. (1998). Bewegung hörbar machen – Warum? Zur Perspektive einer systematischen Umsetzung von Bewegung in Klänge. Psychologie und Sport, 5(1), 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 229–240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, C. (2013). How „paternalistic“ is spatial perception? Why wearing a heavy backpack doesn’t – and couldn’t – make hills look steeper. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(4), 455–473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ganel, T., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape. Nature, 426, 664–667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, B. (1997). Wahrnehmungspsychologie. Heidelberg: Spektrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15, 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., & Carey, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349(6305), 154–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control – With special reference to ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harleß, E. (1861). Der Apparat des Willens. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 38(1861), 50–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbort, O., & Butz, M. V. (2012). Too good to be true? Ideomotor theory from a computational perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 494.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes, C. (2011). Automatic imitation. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 463–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hickok, G. (2009). Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(7), 1229–1243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J. (1993). Vorhersage und Erkenntnis: Die Funktion von Antizipationen in der menschlichen Verhaltenssteuerung und Wahrnehmung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst, E. von, & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950). Das Reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenschaften, 37, 464–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2010). Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm. Experimental Brain Research, 203, 89–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2012). Visual processing for action resists similarity of relevant and irrelevant object features. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 412–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janczyk, M., Skirde, S., Weigelt, M., & Kunde, W. (2009). Visual and tactile action effects determine bimanual coordination performance. Human Movement Science, 28, 437–449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Wallmeier, G., & Kunde, W. (2014). Exceptions to the PRP effect? A comparison of prepared and unconditioned reflexes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 776–786.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, & Kunde, W. (2013). Visual near space is scaled to parameters of current action plans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1313–1325.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, W., Königstein, E., & Kunde, W. (2014). Action feedback affects the perception of action-related objects beyond actual action success. Frontiers in Movement Science and Sport Psychology, 5, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umilta, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297(5582), 846–848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus – response compatibility – A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Külpe, O. (1893). Grundriss der Psychologie, auf experimenteller Grundlage dargestellt. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunde, W. (2004). Response priming by supraliminal and subliminal action effects. Psychological Research, 68(2–3), 91–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde, W. (2006). Antezedente Effektrepräsentationen in der Verhaltenssteuerung. Psychologische Rundschau, 57(1), 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde, W., & Stöcker, C. (2002). A Simon effect for stimulus – response duration. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde, W., & Wühr, P. (2004). Actions blind to conceptually overlapping stimuli. Psychological Research, 68(4), 199–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde, W., Hoffmann, J., & Zellmann, P. (2002). The impact of anticipated action effects on action planning. Acta Psychologica, 109(2), 137–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde, W., Elsner, K., & Kiesel, A. (2007). No anticipation – no action: the role of anticipation in action and perception. Cognitive Processing, 8, 71–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde, W., Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(1), 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde, W., Skirde, S., & Weigelt, M. (2011). Trust my face: Cognitive factors of head fakes in sports. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 110–127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde, W., Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2012). The locus of tool-transformation costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 703–714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21(1), 1–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linser, K., & Goschke, T. (2007). Unconscious modulation of the conscious experience of voluntary control. Cognition, 104(3), 459–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martikainen, M. H., Kaneko, K. I., & Hari, R. (2005). Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 15(3), 299–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, S., Leuthold, H., & Ulrich, R. (2002). Stimulus-response compatibility in intensity-force relations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1175–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198(4312), 75–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (2006). Simon congruency effects based on stimulus and response numerosity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(2), 387–396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psycholology. Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müsseler, J., Kunde, W., Gausepohl, D., & Heuer, H. (2008). Does a tool eliminate spatial compatibility effects? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 211–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1990). Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception. Psychological Research, 52, 207–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noton, D., & Stark, L. (1971). Scanpaths in eye movements during pattern perception. Science, 171(3968), 308–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paelecke, M., & Kunde, W. (2007). Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 33(3), 627–644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino di, Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2012). Harleß’apparatus of will: 150 years later. Psychological Research, 76(5), 561–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2013). Dissecting the response in response-effect compatibility. Experimental Brain Research, 224(4), 647–655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, R., Dignath, D., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2013). It Takes Two to Imitate Anticipation and Imitation in Social Interaction. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2117–2121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., Gressmann, M., Fournier, L. R., & Kunde, W. (2014a). Good vibrations? Vibrotactile self-stimulation reveals anticipation of body-related action effects in motor control. Experimental Brain Research, 232(3), 847–854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, R., Pfeuffer, C. U., & Kunde, W. (2014b). Perceiving by proxy: Effect-based action control with unperceivable effects. Cognition, 132(3), 251–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poulet, J. F., & Hedwig, B. (2002). A corollary discharge maintains auditory sensitivity during sound production. Nature, 418, 872–876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. (1990). A common-coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann, & W. Prinz (Hrsg.), Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (S. 167–201). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. (1998). Die Reaktion als Willenshandlung. Psychologische Rundschau, 49, 10–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(9), 661–670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A. F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. Tutorials in motor behavior, 331–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, A. (2008). Action observation modulates auditory perception of the consequence of others’ actions. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(4), 1219–1227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, A., & Itakura, S. (2013). Intersubjective action-effect binding: Eye contact modulates acquisition of bidirectional association between our and others’ actions. Cognition, 127(3), 383–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 943–974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spijkers, W., Heuer, H., Kleinsorge, T., & Loo, H. van der (1997). Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: Specification interference as revealed by reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 96(3), 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, A., & Stock, C. (2004). A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychological Research, 68(2–3), 176–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. E. T., Witt, J. K., & Sugovic, M. (2011). When walls are no longer barriers: Perception of wall height in parkour. Perception-London, 40(6), 757–780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomaschke, R., Hopkins, B., & Miall, R. C. (2012). The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects. Psychological Review, 119(2), 388–407.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Topolinski, S. (2010). Moving the Eye of the Beholder Motor Components in Vision Determine Aesthetic Preference. Psychological Science, 21, 1220–1224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valle-Inclán, F., & Redondo, M. (1998). On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology, 35(4), 366–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiskrantz, L. (1986). Blindsight: A Case Study and Implications. NewYork: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggett, A. J., Hudson, M., Tipper, S. P., & Downing, P. E. (2011). Learning associations between action and perception: effects of incompatible training on body part and spatial priming. Brain and cognition, 76(1), 87–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, J. K. (2011). Action’s effect on perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 201–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlschläger, A. (2000). Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vision Research, 40, 925–930.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 358, 593–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Psychology III, Universität Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, 97070, Würzburg, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Wilfried Kunde

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Wilfried Kunde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilfried Kunde .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany

    Jochen Müsseler

  2. UMIT – Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik, Institut für Psychologie, Hall in Tirol, Austria

    Martina Rieger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kunde, W. (2017). Handlung und Wahrnehmung. In: Müsseler, J., Rieger, M. (eds) Allgemeine Psychologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53898-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53898-8_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53897-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-53898-8

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation