Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Planung und exekutive Kontrolle von Handlungen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Allgemeine Psychologie

  • 97k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel befasst sich mit der Frage, wie wir intentionale, zielgerichtete Handlungen planen und ausführen, wie wir längere Handlungsketten planen und die Reihenfolge ihrer Elemente organisieren, ob bzw. inwiefern wir mehrere Handlungen zugleich ausführen und wie wir zwischen verschiedenen Aufgaben hin und her wechseln können.

Schlüsselwörter: Motorische Programme; Handlungsplanung; Sequenzierung von Handlungen; Übung von Handlungen; Handlungskoordination; Aufgabenwechsel

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Abeles, M. (1991). Corticonics: Neural circuits of the cerebral cortex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ach, N. (1910). Über den Willensakt und das Temperament. Leipzig: Quelle und Meyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aglioti, S., Goodale, M. A., & DeSouza, J. F. X. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679–685.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, D. A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In D. E. Meyer, & S. Kornblum (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XIV (S. 183–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, D. A., & Wylie, G. (2000). ‘Task-switching’, stimulus-response bindings and negative priming. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of Cognitive Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltá, & M. Moscovitch (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (S. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschersleben, G., Stenneken, P., Cole, J., & Prinz, W. (2002). Timing mechanisms in sensorimotor synchronization. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Hrsg.), Attention und performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (S. 227–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J. (1980). Eliciting predictable speech errors in the laboratory. In V. A. Fromkin (Hrsg.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (S. 307–318). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard, C., Paillard, J., Lajoie, Y., Fleury, M., Teasdale, N., Forget, R., & Lamarre, Y. (1992). Role of the afferent information in the timing of motor commands: A comparative study with a deafferent patient. Neuropsychologia, 30, 201–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive Affective und Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 356–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M. M., & Plaut, D. C. (2004). Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to routine sequential action and its pathologies. Psychological Review, 111, 395–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, B. (2002). Attention and visually guided behavior in distinct systems. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Hrsg.), Attention und performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (S. 120–135). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, B., Kirch, M., & Sperling, A. (1981). Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 336–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., Salenius, S., Rothwell, J. C., & Hari, R. (1998). Cortical correlate of the Piper rhythm in humans. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 2911–2917.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, D., & Grossberg, S. (1988). Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: Emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. Psychological Review, 95, 49–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, P. W. (2000). Strategy application disorder: The role of the frontal lobes in human multitasking. Psychological Research, 63, 279–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J., & Rovee-Collier, C. (1989). Contextual gating of memory retrieval. Developmental Psychobiology, 22, 533–552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, L. M., & Pashler, H. (1995). Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1339–1348.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chugani, H. T. (1994). Development of regional brain glucose metabolism in relation to behavior and plasticity. In G. Dawson, & K. Fischer (Hrsg.), Human behavior and the developing brain (S. 153–175). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 345–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529–553.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Décary, A., & Richer, F. (1995). Response selection deficits in frontal excisions. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1243–1253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, & Grèzes, J. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Bettinardi, V., Tadary, B., Woods, R., Mazziotta, J. C., & Fazio, F. (1994). Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature, 371, 600–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deecke, L., Grozinger, B., & Kornhuber, H. H. (1976). Voluntary finger movement in man: Cerebral potentials and theory. Biological Cybernetics, 23, 99–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965–980.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R. (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (S. 357–376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R., Berendsen, E., & Cools, R. (1999). Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: Dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations. Acta Psychologica, 101, 379–394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K., & Svec, W. R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoe, E. A., & Van Essen, D. C. (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neuroscience, 11, 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. (1985). Development of the ability to use recall to guide action, as indicated by infants’ performance on AB. Child Development, 56, 868–883.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. (1990). Developmental time course in human infants and infant monkeys, and the neural bases of inhibitory control of reaching. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 608, 637–676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A., & Gilbert, J. (1989). Development as progressive inhibitory control of action: Retrieval of a contiguous object. Cognitive Development, 4, 223–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1986). Comparative development in human infants and infant rhesus monkeys of cognitive functions that depend on prefrontal cortex. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 12, 742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. (1981). Algorithms and selective attention. Memory and Cognition, 9, 177–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P., & Just, M. A. (1986). A chronometric analysis of strategy preparation in choice reactions. Memory and Cognition, 14, 488–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donkelaar, P. van, & Franks, I. M. (1991). Preprogramming vs. on-line control in simple movement sequences. Acta Psychologica, 77, 1–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drewe, E. A. (1975). An experimental investigation of Luria’s theory on the effects of frontal lobe lesions in man. Neuropsychologia, 13, 421–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, A., Schweickert, R., Choi, S., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). Cross-task cross talk in memory and perception. Acta Psychologica, 90, 49–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eenshuistra, R. M., Weidema, M. A., & Hommel, B. (2004). Development of the acquisition and control of action-effect associations. Acta Psychologica, 115, 185–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784–1790.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, B., Hommel, B., Mentschel, C., Drzezga, A., Prinz, W., Conrad, B., & Siebner, H. (2002). Linking actions and their perceivable consequences in the human brain. NeuroImage, 17, 364–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, A. K., Roelfsema, P. R., Fries, P., Brecht, M., & Singer, W. (1997). Role of the temporal domain for response selection and perceptual binding. Cerebral Cortex, 7, 571–582.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, B. A., Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1986). Recognition memory and attentional selection: Serial scanning is not enough. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 476–483.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, C. W., Pollack, M. D., & Montague, W. E. (1970). Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual encoding? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 502–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., & O’Hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 165–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K. (1972). An associative basis for coding and organization in memory. In A. W. Melton, & E. Martin (Hrsg.), Coding processes in human memory (S. 161–190). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2608–2611.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fagen, J. W., Rovee-Collier, C. K., & Kaplan, M. G. (1976). Psychophysical scaling of stimulus similarity in 3-month-old infants and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 272–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1992). Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1058–1079.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fimm, B., Bartl, G., Zimermann, P., & Wallesch, C.-W. (1994). Different mechanisms underly shifting set on external and internal cues in Parkinson’s disease. Brain and Cognition, 25, 287–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R., & Hommel, B. (2012). Deep thinking increases task-set shielding and reduces shifting flexibility in dual-task performance. Cognition, 123, 303–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischman, M. G. (1984). Programming time as a function of number movement parts and changes in movement direction. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 405–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischman, M. G., & Lim, C. (1991). Influence of extended practice on programming time, movement time, and transfer in simple target-striking responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 39–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, L. R., Wiediger, M. D., McMeans, R., Mattson, P. S., Kirkwood, J., & Herzog, T. (2010). Holding a manual response sequence in memory can disrupt vocal responses that share semantic features with the manual response. Psychological Research, 74, 359–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, V. A. (Hrsg.). (1980). Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel, C. R. (1980). The organization of action. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Colera, A., & Semjen, A. (1987). The organization of rapid movement sequences as a function of sequence length. Acta Psychologica, 66, 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Colera, A., & Semjen, A. (1988). Distributed planning of movement sequences. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 341–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. F. (1982). Production of speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use. In A. W. Ellis (Hrsg.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (S. 19–76). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. R. (1983). The acquisition of typewriting skill. Acta Psychologica, 54, 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. R., Grudin, J. und Conway, E. (1980). Finger movements in transcription typing. (Technical Report 8001) La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego, Center for Human Information Processing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos, A. P. (1990). Neurophysiology of reaching. In M. Jeannerod (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (S. 227–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J., & Diamond, A. (1994). The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children 31/2–7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test. Cognition, 53, 129–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghez, C., Hening, W., & Favilla, M. (1990). Parallel interacting channels in the initiation and specification of motor response features. In M. Jeannerod (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (S. 265–293). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1941). A critical review of the concept of set in contemporary experimental psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 38, 781–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1980). Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 475–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopher, D. (1996). Attention control: Explorations of the work of an executive controller. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 23–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gopher, D. (1984). S-Oh-R: Of stages! Oh resources! In A. F. Sanders, & W. Prinz (Hrsg.), Cognition and motor processes (S. 231–253). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1974). Processes for sequence production. Psychological Review, 81, 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G. (1972). On doing two things at once: Time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 52–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G. (2003). On doing two things at once: III. Confirmation of perfect timesharing when simultaneous tasks are ideomotor compatible. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 859–868.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G. (2004). On doing two things at once: IV. Necessary and sufficient conditions: Rejoinder to Lien, Proctor, and Ruthruff (2003). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 632–636.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. (1983). Non-hierarchic specification of components in transcription typewriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harless, E. (1861). Der Apparat des Willens. Zeitschrift fuer Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 38, 50–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, D. L., & Haaland, K. Y. (1987). Programming sequences of hand postures. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 77–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a „memory drum“ theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (1981). Fast aiming movements with the left and right hand: Evidence for two-process theories of motor control. Psychological Research, 43, 81–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (1986). Über die Annahme relations-abhängiger Vorprogrammierung bei der Interpretation von Reaktionszeitexperimenten zur motorischen Vorbereitung. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 33, 563–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, W., & Kalmar, D. (1987). Characterizing attentional resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J. (1993). Vorhersage und Erkenntnis. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J., Sebald, A., & Stöcker, C. (2001). Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 470–482.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holender, D. (1980). Interference between a vocal and a manual response to the same stimulus. In G. E. Stelmach, & J. Requin (Hrsg.), Tutorials in motor behavior (S. 421–431). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, C., & Rathod, V. (2013). Influence of personal mobile phone ringing and usual intention to answer on driver error. Accident Analysis und Prevention, 50, 793–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1996a). The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59, 176–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1996b). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel, & W. Prinz (Hrsg.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (S. 281–320). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1998a). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368–1384.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1998b). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2000a). Intentional control of automatic stimulus-response translation. In Y. Rossetti, & A. Revonsuo (Hrsg.), Interaction between dissociable conscious and nonconscious processes (S. 223–244). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2000b). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (S. 247–273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73, 512–526.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2010). Grounding attention in action control: The intentional control of selection. In B. J. Bruya (Hrsg.), Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (S. 121–140). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. L. (1931). Goal attraction and directing ideas conceived as habit phenomena. Psychological Review, 38, 487–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulstijn, W., & Galen, G. P. van (1983). Programming in handwriting: Reaction time and movement time as a function of sequence length. Acta Psychologica, 54, 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulstijn, W., & Galen, G. P. van (1988). Levels of motor programming in writing familiar and unfamiliar symbols. In A. M. Colley, & J. K. Beech (Hrsg.), Cognition and action in skilled behavior (S. 65–85). Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 188–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inhoff, A. W. (1986). Preparing sequences of saccades under choice reaction conditions: Effects of sequence length and context. Acta Psychologica, 61, 211–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ivry, R. B., Franz, E. A., Kingstone, A., & Johnston, J. C. (1998). The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: Uncoupling of lateralized response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 463–480.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Dover.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural objects. In J. Long, & A. Baddeley (Hrsg.), Attention and performance IX (S. 153–169). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (1984). The contribution of open-loop and closed-loop control modes in prehension movements. In S. Kornblum, & J. Requin (Hrsg.), Preparatory states and processes: Proceedings of the franco-american conference (S. 323–337). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M., & Biguer, B. (1982). Visuomotor mechanisms in reaching within extrapersonal space. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Hrsg.), Analysis of visual behavior (S. 387–409). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolicœur, P. (1999). Capacity demands of accessing short-term memory. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, June 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolicœur, P., & Dell’Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jolicœur, P., Dell’Acqua, R., & Crebolder, J. (2000). Multitasking performance deficits: Forging some links between the attentional blink and the psychological refractory period. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (S. 309–330). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolicœur, P., Tombu, M., Oriet, C., & Stevanovski, B. (2002). From perception to action: Making the connection. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Hrsg.), Attention und performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (S. 558–586). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachergis, G., Wyatte, D., O’Reilly, R. C., Kleijn, R. de, & Hommel, B. (2014). A continuous time neural model for sequential action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20130623. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0623).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaska, J. F., & Hyde, M. L. (1985). Area 4 and area 5: Differences between the load direction-dependent discharge variability of cells during active postural fixation. Experimental Brain Research, 59, 197–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnins, I. V., & Bruner, J. S. (1973). The coordination of visual observation and instrumental behavior in early infancy. Perception, 2, 307–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, L., & Kerstenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 167–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S. W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S. W., & Posner, M. I. (1968). Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 155–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S. W., Cohen, A., & Ivry, R. (1990). Motor programs: Concepts and issues. In M. Jeannerod (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (S. 77–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023–1026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching – A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, S. T., & Wyatt, E. P. (1976). Motor programming within a sequence of resposes. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 19–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn, R. de, Kachergis, G., & Hommel, B. (2014). Everyday robotic action: Lessons from human action control. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 8, 13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kluwe, R. H. (1997). Intentionale Steuerung kognitiver Aktivität. Kognitionswissenschaft, 6, 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1990). Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornbrot, D. E. (1989). Organisation of keying skills: The effect of motor complexity and number of units. Acta Psychologica, 70, 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kray, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2000). Adult age differences in task switching. Psychology and Aging, 15, 126–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva-Feige, R., Feige, B., Makeig, S., Ross, B., & Elbert, T. (1993). Oscillatory brain activity during a motor task. NeuroReport, 4, 1291–1294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kühn, S., Keizer, A., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Hommel, B. (2011). The functional and neural mechanism of action preparation: Roles of EBA and FFA in voluntary action control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 214–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Donchin, E. (1980). Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 202, 95–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lashley, K. S. (1917). The accuracy of movement in the absence of excitation from the moving organ. American Journal of Physiology, 43, 169–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Hrsg.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (S. 112–146). New York: John Wiley und Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. D., Elliott, D., & Carnahan, H. (1987). The preparation of actions and parameters of action: A fixed or variable process? Acta Psychologica, 66, 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, J. A. (1958). Partial advance information in a choice reaction task. Genetic Psychology, 49, 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lépine, D., Glencross, D., & Requin, J. (1989). Some experimental evidence for and against a parametric conception of movement programming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 347–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1922). Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation II. Psychologische Forschung, 2, 65–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lhermitte, F. (1983). „Utilization behaviour“ and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain, 106, 237–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Livesey, D. J., & Morgan, G. A. (1991). The development of response inhibition in 4- and 5-year-old children. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43, 133–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1978). Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 32–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1980). Short-term memory demands of reaction-time tasks that differ in complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 375–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575–599.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J. (1986). Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: A comparison of stop, change, and dual-task paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 549–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072–1090.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig: Weidmann’sche Buchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1961). The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, W. A. (1997). Synchronized neuronal oscillations and their role in motor processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 176–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeilage, P. F. (1970). Motor control of serial ordering of speech. Psychological Review, 77, 182–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malsburg, C. von der (1981). The correlation theory of brain function. Internal report. Göttingen: Max-Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malsburg, C. von der (1995). Binding in models of perception and brain function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 520–526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 1124–1140.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, R. D., & Schenk, T. (2009). Two visual streams for perception and action: current trends. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1391–1396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, B., & Schaal, S. (2002). Forward models in visuomotor control. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 942–953.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N. (2000a). Reconfiguration of stimulus task-sets and response task-sets during task-switching. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (S. 377–399). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N. (2000b). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N., Hommel, B., Bibi, U., & Ben-Dov, I. (2002). Consciousness and control in task switching. Consciousness und Cognition, 11, 10–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melcher, T., Weidema, M., Eenshuistra, R. M., Hommel, B., & Gruber, O. (2008). The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle: An event-related fMRI analysis. NeuroImage, 39, 1274–1288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E., & Gordon, P. C. (1985). Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, E. D. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple task performance: Part 1, Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E., Kieras, D. E., Lauber, E., Schumacher, E., Glass, J., Zurbriggen, E., Gmeind, L., & Apfelblat, D. (1995). Adaptive executive control: Flexible multiple-task performance without pervasive immutable response-selection bottlenecks. Acta Psychologica, 90, 163–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart und Winston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, H. N., & Mischel, W. (1983). The development of children’s knowledge of self-control strategies. Child Development, 54, 603–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Macko, K. A. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. Trends in Neuroscience, 6, 414–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S. (1986). Programming of complex sequences: Evidence from the timing of rapid speech and other productions. In H. Heuer, & C. Fromm (Hrsg.), Generation and modulation of action patterns (S. 72–86). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Hrsg.), Unsolved mysteries of the mind (S. 93–148). Hove: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S., & Driver, J. (Hrsg.). (2000). Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münsterberg, H. (1889). Beiträge zur experimentellen Psychologie. Bd. 1. Freiburg: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, V. N., & Fetz, E. E. (1992). Coherent 25- to 35-Hz oscillations in the sensorimotor cortex of awake behaving monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89, 5670–5674.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, V. N., & Fetz, E. E. (1996). Oscillatory activity in sensorimotor cortex of awake monkeys: Synchronization of local field potentials and relation to behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 3949–3967.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human information-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D., & Miller, J. (1987). Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 435–448.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Netick, A., & Klapp, S. T. (1994). Hesitations in manual tracking: A single-channel limit in response programming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 766–782.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1987). Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. In H. Heuer, & A. F. Sanders (Hrsg.), Perspectives on perception and action (S. 361–394). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: Inferences from movement-related brain research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217–232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, A. M., Stern, C. E., Look, R. B., Tracey, I., Rosen, B. R., & Petrides, M. (1993). Functional organization of spatial and nonspatial working memory processing within the human lateral frontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 95, 7721–7726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H. (1994a). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H. (1994b). Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 330–342.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H., & Christian, C. (1996). Bottlenecks in planning and producing manual, vocal, and foot responses. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript. http://www.pashler.com/Articles/techreport/Pashler_Christian_Techreport1994.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passingham, R. (1993). The frontal lobes and voluntary action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret, E. (1974). The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behavior. Neuropsychologia, 12, 323–330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfurtscheller, G., Flotzinger, D., & Neuper, C. (1994). Differentiation between finger, toe and tongue movement in man based on 40 Hz EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 90, 456–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Portier, S. J., & Galen, G. P. van (1992). Immediate vs. postponed visual feedback in practising a handwriting task. Human Movement Science, 11, 563–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portier, S. J., Galen, G. P. van, & Meulenbroek, R. G. J. (1990). Practice and the dynamics of handwriting performance: Evidence for a shift of motor programming load. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 474–492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. M. (1980). What was the matter with Dr. Spooner? In V. A. Fromkin (Hrsg.), Errors in linguistic performance (S. 13–34). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povel, D., & Collard, R. (1982). Structural factors in patterned finger tapping. Acta Psychologica, 52, 107–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prablanc, C., & Jeannerod, M. (1975). Corrective saccades: Dependence on retinal reafferent signals. Vision Research, 15, 465–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prablanc, C., & Pélisson, D. (1990). Gaze saccade orienting and hand pointing are locked to their goal by quick internal loops. In M. Jeannerod (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XIII (S. 653–676). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. (1987). Ideo-motor action. In H. Heuer, & A. F. Sanders (Hrsg.), Perspectives on perception and action (S. 47–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. (1997). Why Donders has led us astray. In B. Hommel, & W. Prinz (Hrsg.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (S. 247–267). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (1986). A caution regarding use of the hint procedure to determine whether partial stimulus information activates response. Perception and Psychophysics, 40, 110–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. T., & Sherwood, D. E. (1983). Time requirements of changes in program and parameter variables in rapid ongoing movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 163–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbitt, P. (1997). Introduction: Methodologies and models in the study of executive function. In P. Rabbitt (Hrsg.), Methodology of frontal and executive function (S. 1–38). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Requin, J. (1992). From action representation to movement control. In G. E. Stelmach, & J. Requin (Hrsg.), Tutorials in motor behavior II (S. 159–179). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. C., Robbins, T. W., & Weiskrantz, L. (1998). The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rochat, P., & Striano, T. (1999). Emerging self-exploration by 2-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 2, 206–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roelfsema, P. R., Engel, A. K., König, P., & Singer, W. (1997). Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas. Nature, 385, 157–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 124, 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. D., Sahakian, B. J., Hodges, J. R., Polkey, C. E., Kennard, C., & Robbins, T. W. (1998). Dissociating executive mechanisms of task control following frontal lobe damage and Parkinson’s disease. Brain, 121, 815–842.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrer, D., Pashler, H., & Etchegaray, J. (1998). When two memories can and cannot be retrieved concurrently. Memory and Cognition, 26, 731–739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A. (1987). Successive approximations to a model of human motor programming. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 21, 153–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A. (1991). Human motor control. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., & Kornblum, S. (1982). A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 51, 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., & Krist, H. (1993). Vorbereitung von Bewegungen. In H. Heuer, & S. W. Keele (Hrsg.), Psychomotorik, Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Serie Kognition (Bd. 3, S. 3–85). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Kenny, S. B., & Derr, M. A. (1983). Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 86–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Inhoff, A. W., & Gordon, A. M. (1984). Choosing between movement sequences: A hierarchical editor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 372–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Weber, R. J., Hazelett, W. M., & Hindorff, V. (1986). The parameter remapping effect in human performance: Evidence from tongue twisters and finger fumblers. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 710–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Hindorff, V., & Munro, E. M. (1987). Scheduling and programming of rapid finger sequences: Tests and elaborations of the hierarchical editor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 193–203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., Barnes, H. J., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1992). Time course of movement planning: Selection of hand grips for object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1058–1073.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Loukopoulos, L. D., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Vaughan, J., & Engelbrecht, S. (1995). Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102, 28–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossetti, Y., & Pisella, L. (2002). Several ‘vision for action’ systems: A guide to dissociating and integrating dorsal and ventral functions. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Hrsg.), Attention und performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (S. 62–119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossetti, Y., & Régnier, C. (1995). Representations in action: Pointing to a target with various representations. In B. G. Bardy, R. J. Bootsma, & Y. Guiard (Hrsg.), Studies in perception and action III (S. 233–236). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. (1988). Investigations on the basis of the generalized motor programme hypothesis. In O. G. Meijer, & K. Roth (Hrsg.), The motor-action controversy (S. 261–288). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, J. C., Traub, M. M., Day, B. L., Obeso, J. A., Thomas, P. K., & Marsden, C. D. (1982). Manual motor performance in a deafferented man. Brain, 105, 515–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rovee, C. K., & Rovee, D. T. (1969). Conjugate reinforcement in infant exploratory behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8, 33–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rovee-Collier, C., Sullivan, M. W., Enright, M. K., Lucas, D., & Fagen, J. W. (1980). Reactivation of infant memory. Science, 208, 1159–1161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, J., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763–797.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1982). Simulating a skilled typist: A study of skilled cognitive-motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Van Selst, M. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 3–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Remington, R. W. (2009). How strategic is the central bottleneck: Can it be overcome by trying harder? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1368–1384.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salenius, S., Salmelin, R., Neuper, C., Pfurtscheller, G., & Hari, R. (1996). Human cortical 40 Hz rhythm is closely related to EMG rhythmicity. Neuroscience Letters, 213, 75–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A. F. (1983). Towards a model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychologica, 53, 61–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanes, J. N., & Donoghue, J. P. (1993). Oscillations in local field potentials of the primate motor cortex during voluntary movement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 90, 4470–4474.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sarno, K. J., & Wickens, C. D. (1995). Role of multiple resources in predicting time-sharing efficiency: Evaluation of three workload models in a multiple-task setting. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5, 107–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G. (1933). Über Rückfälligkeit bei Umgewöhnung: 2. Über Handlungsganzheiten und ihre Bedeutung für die Rückfälligkeit. Psychologische Forschung, 18, 143–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweickert, R. (1978). A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a Stroop task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 18, 105–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semjen, & Garcia-Colera, A. (1986). Planning and timing of finger-tapping sequences with a stressed element. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18, 287–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Semjen, A., & Gottsdanker, R. (1991). Structural facilitation of movement sequence planning. In J. Requin, & G. E. Stelmach (Hrsg.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience (S. 397–412). Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, L. H. (1975). Control processes in typing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27A, 419–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, L. H. (1991). Cognition and motor programming. In J. Requin, & G. E. Stelmach (Hrsg.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience (S. 371–383). Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sideaway, B. (1994). The interaction of response complexity and instructional set. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, W. (1994). The organization of sensory motor representations in the neocortex: A hypothesis based on temporal coding. In C. Umiltà, & M. Moscovitch (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (S. 77–107). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, W. (2011). Dynamic formation of functional networks by synchronization. Neuron, 69, 191–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. C. (1969). The effect of varying information on the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica, 30, 220–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spijkers, W. (1993). Sehen und Handeln. Aachen: Shaker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stablum, F., Leonardi, G., Mazzoldi, M., Umiltà, C., & Morra, S. (1994). Attention and control deficits following closed head injury. Cortex, 30, 603–618.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stelmach, G. E., & Teulings, H. (1983). Response characteristics of prepared and restructured handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelmach, G. E., Mullins, P. A., & Teulings, H. (1984). Motor programming and temporal patterns in handwriting. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, 144–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Hrsg.), Information processing in motor control and learning (S. 117–152). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S., Wright, C. E., Knoll, R. L., & Monsell, S. (1982). Motor programs in rapid speech. In R. Cole (Hrsg.), Perception and production of fluent speech (S. 507–534). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • St James, J. D. (1990). Observations on the microstructure of response conflict. Perception and Psychophysics, 48, 517–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625–1640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Schröter, H., Soetens, E., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sudevan, P., & Taylor, D. A. (1987). The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 89–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tallon-Baudry, C., & Bertrand, O. (1999). Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 151–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taub, E., & Berman, A. J. (1968). Movement and learning in the absence of sensory feedback. In S. J. Freedman (Hrsg.), The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior (S. 173–192). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telford, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzuolo, C. A., & Viviani, P. (1980). Determinants and characteristics of motor patterns used for typing. Neuroscience, 5, 1085–1103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teulings, H., Thomassen, A. J. W. M., & Galen, G. P. van (1983). Preparation of partly precued handwriting movements: The size of movement units in handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teulings, H., Mullins, P. A., & Stelmach, G. E. (1986). The elementary units of programming in handwriting. In G. P. van Galen, H. S. R. Kao, & R. Hoosain (Hrsg.), Graphonomics: Contemporary research in handwriting (S. 21–32). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. M. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Hrsg.), Analysis of visual behavior (S. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Selst, M., & Jolicœur, P. (1997). Decision and response. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 266–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Selst, M., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J. C. (1999). Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1268–1283.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Sonderen, J. F., & Denier, G. J. J. van der (1991). Reaction-time-dependent differences in the initial movement direction of fast goal-directed arm movements. Human Movement Science, 10, 713–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Steenbergen, H. van, Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2009). Reward counteracts conflict adaptation: Evidence for a role of affect in executive control. Psychological Science, 20, 1473–1477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Steenbergen, H. van, Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B. (2010). In the mood for adaptation: How affect regulates conflict-driven control. Psychological Science, 21, 1629–1634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Steenbergen, H. van, Band, G.P.H., Hommel, B., Rombouts, S.A.R.B. und Nieuwenhuis, S. (2015). Hedonic hotspots regulate cingulate-driven adaptation to cognitive demands. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 1746–1756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschoor, S. A., Spapé, M., Biro, S., & Hommel, B. (2013). From outcome prediction to action selection: Developmental change in the role of action-effect bindings. Developmental Science, 16, 801–814.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verschoor, S. A., Weidema, M., Biro, S., & Hommel, B. (2010). Where do action goals come from? Evidence for spontaneous action-effect binding in infants. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Verwey, W. B. (1994). Evidence for the development of concurrent processing in a sequential keypressing task. Acta Psychologica, 85, 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, F., Bonnet, M., & Macar, F. (1991). Programming response duration in a precueing reaction time paradigm. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 226–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L. M. (1982). Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 562–581.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. S., & Ramey, C. T. (1972). Reactions to response-contingent stimulation in early infancy. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 18, 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, A. T. (1952). The „psychological refractory period“ and the timing of high-speed performance – a review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickelgren, W. A. (1969). Context-sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in (speech) behavior. Psychological Review, 76, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. Nickerson (Hrsg.), Attention and performance VIII (S. 239–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman, & D. R. Davies (Hrsg.), Varieties of attention (S. 63–102). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D., & Liu, Y. (1988). Codes and modalities in multiple resources: A success and a qualification. Human Factors, 30, 599–616.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, J., Hyland, B., & Anson, G. (1994). Cortical cell assemblies: A possible mechanism for motor programs. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 66–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419–433.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3, 1–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, G., & Allport, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of „switch costs“. Psychological Research, 63, 212–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yaniv, I., Meyer, D. E., Gordon, P. C., Huff, C. A., & Sevald, C. A. (1990). Vowel similarity, connectionist models, and syllable structure in motor programming of speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yantis, S. (2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (S. 73–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelaznik, H. N. (1978). Precuing response factors in choice reaction time: A word of caution. Journal of Motor Behavior, 10, 77–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelaznik, H. N., & Hahn, R. (1985). Reaction time methods in the study of motor programming: The precuing of hand, digit and duration. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 190–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelazo, P. D., Reznick, J. S., & Piñon, D. E. (1995). Response control and the execution of verbal rules. Developmental Psychology, 31, 508–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zießler, M., Hänel, K., & Hoffmann, J. (1988). Die Programmierung struktureller Eigenschaften von Bewegungsfolgen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 196, 371–388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zillig, M. (1926). Die Übung der Umstellung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 100, 18–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituut Psychologie, Universiteit Leiden, Pieter de la Court gebouw, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK, Leiden, Niederlande

    Prof. Bernhard Hommel PhD

Authors
  1. Prof. Bernhard Hommel PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernhard Hommel PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany

    Jochen Müsseler

  2. UMIT – Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik, Institut für Psychologie, Hall in Tirol, Austria

    Martina Rieger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hommel, B. (2017). Planung und exekutive Kontrolle von Handlungen. In: Müsseler, J., Rieger, M. (eds) Allgemeine Psychologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53898-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53898-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53897-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-53898-8

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation