Modeling and Prediction Using Process Reliability of Wire Rope

  • Xingbin Ma
  • Cuiping Jiang
  • Baiqing Diao
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 287)

Abstract

The dynamic stress–strength interference theory are based on wire rope combined into nondestructive testing information, Destructive field inspection information and condition monitoring. The reliability modeling methods are put forward according to the structure characteristic of wire rope. This is a method for the reliability evaluation design, Prediction and renewal policy of wire rope. Not only there is an important signification for the reliability of wire rope, but also a new method for mechanical system reliability is put forward.

Keywords

Reliability Strength interference theory Stress Strength Wire rope 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China, under the Grants 71071089; supported by Science and Technology Development Planning of Shandong, under the Grants 2012RKB01457.

References

  1. 1.
    Liang LM (1984) Several broken rope accident occurred in Switzerland. Lifting Transp Mach (7):56–57. (translated)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ministry of Coal Industry (1986) Coal safety regulations. Coal Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu S (1984) Lifting wire rope bending fatigue strength test. Crane (11):31–40Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baiqing D, Wu W, Shuzi Y (1994) The splining interpolation method of wire rope inspection data parametric polished. Acad J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol 22(7):32–35Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thefferin D (1983) Wire rope wire rope test research as the main basis for the calculation and selection. Crane 10:31–35Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yangsheng W, Hanmin S, Shuzi Y, The principle for the wire rope quantitative detection and its practice. Chinese science Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tan M (1983) The hoist tension monitoring device. Colliery Guardian, p 12Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baiqing D, Wei W, Shuzi Y (1994) Reliability assessment of the wire rope safety factor. Mech Strength 16(3):19–23Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koichi H, Kazvhiko T, Tuzo F, Kazvo T (1991) Estimation of remaining strength of steel wire rope by electromagnetic testing. J Kyoto Univ 53(4):215–235Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cao J, Cheng K (1986) Reliability mathematics. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou Y (2004) Analysis techniques in material science. China Machine Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jian D, Xibing L, Desheng G (2002) Numerical approximation method in reliability analysis of engineering structure. Chin J Comput Mech 19(2):212–216 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Canu S et al (2005) SVM and kernel methods matlab toolboxGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ye CF, Wang JF, Zhao HX (2006) Trees with m-matchings and the third minimal Hosoya index. Match Commun Math Comput Chem 55:593–604MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wagner S, Gutman I (2011) Maxima and minima of the Hosoya index and the Merrifield-Simmons index. Acta Appl Math 23:237–241Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xingbin Ma
    • 1
  • Cuiping Jiang
    • 1
  • Baiqing Diao
    • 1
  1. 1.Shandong University of Science and TechnologyJinanChina

Personalised recommendations