Vocational Skills Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Track Maintenance Workers

  • Dongyao Jia
  • Shengxiong Zou
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 288)


The traditional personnel quality evaluation currently are subjective or objective evaluation method. However, objective evaluation methods for investigating dynamic indicators are mainly restricted to equipment maintenance capabilities, and static evaluation methods cannot represent a subjective evaluation of the long-term changes in personal qualities of the track maintenance workers. This paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation method for vocational skills of maintenance personnel based on the static and dynamic evaluation results, mechanic skills evaluation can be divided into comprehensive quality evaluation and the level of job evaluation, the ratio of static and dynamic evaluation results is proposed based on the two-stage comprehensive evaluation method and evaluation procedure, so the comprehensive evaluation method is more diverse and flexible. Experimental results show that this method can overcome the static or dynamic unity of evaluation result, the accuracy of the evaluation method is effectively improved for considering the subjective and objective factors, which makes the evaluation results more reasonable.


Comprehensive evaluation Static and dynamic evaluation Two-stage method 


  1. 1.
    Samanta B, Sarkar B, Mukherjee SK et al (2004) An application of AHP for selection of maintenance personnel in mine. J Mines Metals Fuels 52:420–424Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gupta R, Sachdeva A, Bhardwaj A (2012) A framework for selection of logistics outsourcing partner in uncertain environment using TOPSIS. Int J Ind Syst Eng 12(2):223–242Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun BJ, Wang L (2008) Application of material-units analysis method to the human resources allocation in enterprises. Autom Instrum 23(7):1–3 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xu ZS, Zhang L (2003) An overview of operators for aggregating information. Int J Intell Syst 18(9):953–969 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Darema F (2005) Grid computing and beyond: the context of dynamic data driven applications systems. Proc IEEE 93(3):692–697Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Damarla TR, Pham T, Lake D (2004) An algorithm for classifying multiple targets using acoustic signature. In: Proceedings of SPIE signal processing, sensor fusion and target recognition, Vol 5429. pp 421–427Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    John H (1975) A adaptation in natural and artificial system. University of Michigan Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bian X, Tian HP, Guo YJ (2004) Suppliers with stimulating dynamic evaluation method. Nankai Bus Rev 7(5):87–90 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yi PT, Zhang N, Guo YJ (2009) Study on dimensionless methods in dynamic comprehensive evaluation. J Northeast Univ 30(6):889–92 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Advanced Control Systems LaboratoryBeijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations