Advertisement

Failure Mode Criticality Analysis of Metro Door System

  • Jun Xia
  • Li sha Pan
  • Xiao qing Cheng
  • Yong Qin
  • Zong yi Xing
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 288)

Abstract

Implementing failure mode criticality analysis on metro door system could help to find the failure modes which have great criticality on door system, and it can be helpful for perfecting door maintenance decision. A criticality analysis method which is based on fuzzy evidential reasoning and grey theory is proposed. First, fuzzy belief structure is employed to assess failure modes; second, grey theory is used to calculate the degrees of grey relation of failure modes, that the experiment results show that three failure modes, including “EDCU function is broken,” “Limit switch S1 wears out,” and “Nut component wears out,” have great damage on door system. The results can be used for optimal design and maintenance of the metro door system.

Keywords

Metro door Criticality analysis Fuzzy evidential reasoning Grey theory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by National High-tech R&D program of China (863 Program, No.2011AA110501) and National Technology R&D Program of China (No. BAG01B05). Zong yi Xing is the corresponding author.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmet CK, Mehmet C (2012) Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS based fuzzy AHP. Expert Syst Appl 39:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang ZW, Ren GC, Meng BM (2011) Reliability analysis of failure mode for machining center. Modular Mach Autom Manuf Tech 10:10–16 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu L, Liu HC, Lin QL (2011) FMEA method based on fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey relational theory. Fuzzy Syst Math 25(2): 71–80 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang JB, Wang YM, Xu DL (2006) The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties. Eur J Oper Res 17:309–343MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guo M, Yang JB, Chin KS (2009) Evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under both fuzzy and interval uncertainty. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17(3):683–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feng M (2008) FMEA method based upon fuzzy set theory and grey relational theory. Ind Eng J 11(4):109–112 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu H-C, Liu L, Liu N (2012) Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR. Expert Syst Appl 39:129126–129134Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang Z-F, Chu X-N (2011) Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty. Expert Syst Appl 38:206–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen CB, Klien CM (1997) A simple approach to ranking a group of aggregated fuzzy utilities. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B 27(1):26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luo D, Liu S-F (2005) Grey relational decision-making method research. Chin J Manage Sci 13(1):101–106 (in Chinese)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pillay A, Wang J (2003) Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 79:69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jun Xia
    • 1
  • Li sha Pan
    • 2
  • Xiao qing Cheng
    • 3
  • Yong Qin
    • 3
  • Zong yi Xing
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Engineering Technology Research CenterGuangzhou Metro CorporationGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and SafetyBeijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations