Seasonal Variations of Soil Fungi Isolated from the Rhizosphere of Liriodendron tulipifera L.

  • Harold F. Mabee
  • J. H. B. Garner
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 8)


Seasonal variation exists among the variety of organisms within an ecosystem, but few studies show such variation among soil fungi, except for obvious structures like mushrooms. Soil fungi that are active during a particular season may not be active during other seasons. When unable to compete with other fungi or to adapt to soil conditions, many soil fungi form spores or other resistant structures that are capable of remaining dormant until conditions necessary for germination are present. To better understand the role of fungi in the soil, the presence or absence of seasonal variation should be determined. The present study was initiated to determine whether seasonal variation occurred among the fungi isolated from the soil surrounding two tulip poplars (Liriodendron tulipifera L., also called tulip tree and yellow poplar; see Chapters 4.4 and 5.2).


Soil fungi seasonality decomposers strip-bait rhizosphere populations Liriodendron tulipifera spores active fungi inactive fungi 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bowser, W. E., and J. N. Leat. 1958. Seasonal pH fluctuations in a grey wooded soil. Can. J. Microbiol 3(2), 351–358.Google Scholar
  2. Brian, P. W. 1960. Antagonistic and competitive mechanisms limiting survival and activity of fungi in soil. In The Ecology of Soil Fungi ,D. Parkinson and J. S. Waid, ed. pp. 115 to 129. Liverpool, England: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Day, P. R. 1965. Particle fraction and particle-size analysis. In Method of Soil Analysis ,C. A. Black, ed. Part I, pp. 545–567. Madison, Wis.: American Society of Soil Agron omists.Google Scholar
  4. Gates, F. C. 1949. Soil water content. In Field Manual of Plant Ecology ,pp. 87–88. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Luttrell, E. S. 1967. A strip bait for studying the growth of fungi in soil and aerial habitats. Phytopathology 51 ,1266–1267.Google Scholar
  6. Lutz, H. J., and R. F. Chandler, Jr. 1955. Forest Soils. 514 pp. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Novak, R. O., and W. F. Whittingham. 1968. Soil and litter microfungi of a maple, elm, ash floodplain community. Mycologia 60, 776–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Orpurt, P. A., and J. T. Curtis. 1957. Soil microfungi in relation to the prairie continuum in Wisconsin. Ecology 38, 628–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Papavizas, G. C., and C. B. Davey. 1959. Evaluations of various media and antimicrobial agents for isolation of soil fungi. Soil Sci. 88, 112–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Russels, E. W. 1961. Soil Conditions and Plant Growth. 9th ed., 688 pp. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
  11. Soil Survey Staff. 1951. Soil characteristic table. In U.S. Dept. Agr. Soil Survey Manual. Handbook No. 18. p. 209. Agr. Res. Admin., U.S. Dept. Agr.Google Scholar
  12. Warcup, J. H. 1950. The soil-plate method for isolation of fungi from soil. Nature 166, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harold F. Mabee
    • 1
  • J. H. B. Garner
    • 2
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentEast Tennessee State UniversityJohnson CityUSA
  2. 2.Office of Criteria DevelopmentEnvironmental Protection AgencyResearch Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations