Skip to main content

On Measuring Consensus in the Setting of Fuzzy Preference Relations

  • Chapter
Non-Conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 301))

Abstract

Consensus, traditionally understood as a full and unanimous agreement, is a utopia in virtually all practical cases. A degree of consensus to indicate how far one is from complete agreement does therefore make sense. We present a ‘soft’ consensus measure which is basically a degree to which, say, “most pairs of individuals agree as to their preferences between almost all relevant options”. The point of departure is the set of individual preference relations. A fuzzy-logic-based calculus of linguistically quantified proposition is employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  • Bezdek J., B. Spillman and R. Spillman (1977). “Fuzzy measures of preference and consensus in group decision making”. In K.S. Fu (ed.) Proc. 1977 IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, 1303–1309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek J., B. Spillman and R. Spillman (1978). “A fuzzy relation space for group decision theory”. Fuzzy Sets and Syst. 1, 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek J., B. Spillman and R. Spillman (1979). “Fuzzy relation spaces for group decision theory: an application.” Fuzzy Sets and Syst. 2, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blin J.M. (1974). “Fuzzy relations in group decision theory”. J. Cybern. 4, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blin J.M. and A.B. Whinston (1973). “Fuzzy sets and social choice.” J. Cybern. 3, 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris D.R. and A.P. Sage (1975). “Introduction and survey of group decision making with applications to worth assessment”. IEEE Trans. on Syst. Man and Cybern. SMC-5, 346–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedrizzi M. (1986). “Group decisions and consensus: a model using fuzzy sets theory” (in Italian). Rivista di mat. per le scienze econ. e soc. A.9, F.1, 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • French S. (1981). “Consensus of opinion”. Europ. J. Op. Res. 7, 332–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung L.W. and K.S. Fu (1975). “An axiomatic approach to relational decision-making in a fuzzy environment”. In L.A. Zadeh et al. (eds.): Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes. Academic Press, New York, 227–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin W.F. and W. Restle (1974). “The road to agreement: subgroup pressures in small group consensus processes.” J. Pers. and Soc. Psych. 3, 500–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot M.M. (1974). “Reaching a consensus”. J. Amer. Stat. Ass. 69, 118–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare A.P. (1952). “A study of interaction and consensus in different sized groups”. Am. Soc. Rev. 261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J. (1983). “Multistage Decision-Making under Fuzziness: Theory and Practice”. Verlag TÜV Rheinland, Cologne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J. (1984). “Collective decision making with a fuzzy majority rule”. Proc. WOGSC Congress. AFCET, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J. (1985a). “Zadeh’s commonsense knowledge and its use in multicriteria, multistage and multiperson decision making”. In M.M. Gupta et al. (eds.) Approximate Reasoning in Expert Systems. North-Holland, Amsterdam (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J. (1985b). “Some ‘commonsense’ solution concepts in group decision making via fuzzy linguistic quantifiers”. In J. Kacprzyk and R.R. Yager (eds.): Management Decision Support Systems Using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory. Verlag TÜV Rheinland, Cologne, 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J. (1985c). “Group decision-making with a fuzzy majority via linguistic quantifiers”. Part I: A Con sensory-like pooling. Cybernetics and Systems: an Inter. Journal 16, 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J. (1985c). “Group decision-making with a fuzzy majority via linguistic quantifiers”. Part II: A Competitive-like pooling. Cybernetics and Systems: an Inter. Journal 16, 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J. (1986a). “Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority”. Fuzzy Sets and Syst. 18, 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J. (1986b). “On some fuzzy cores and ‘soft’ consensus measures in group decision making”. In J. Bezdek (ed.): The Analysis of Fuzzy Information. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J. (1986c). “Towards and algorithmic/procedural ‘human consistency’ of decision support systems: a fuzzy logic approach”. In W. Karwowshi and A. Mittal (eds.): Applications of Fuzzy Sets in Human Factors. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J. (1987). “Towards ‘human consistent’ decision support systems through commonsense knowledge based decision making and control models: a fuzzy logic approach.” Computers and Artificial Intelligence (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J. and M. Fedrizzi (1986). “‘Soft’ consensus measures for monitoring real consensus under fuzzy preferences”. Control and Cybernetics (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J. and R.R. Yager, eds. (1985). “Management Decision Support Systems Using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory”. Verlag TÜV Rheinland, Cologne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly F.P. (1981). “How a group reaches agreement: a stochastic model.” Math. Soc. Sci. 2, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly J.S. (1978). “Arrow Impossibility Theorems”. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline J.A. (1972). “Orientation and group consensus”. Central States Speech J. 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson J.J. (1972). “An experimental study of the effects of orientation behavior on small group consensus”. Speech Mono. 159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmin V.B. (1982). “Construction of Group Decisions in the Spaces of Non-fuzzy and Fuzzy Binary Relations”. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmin V.B. and S.V. Ovchinnikov (1980a). “Group decisions I: in arbitrary spaces of fuzzy binary relations”. Fuzzy Sets and Syst. 4, 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmin V.B. and S.V. Ovchinnikov (1980b). “Design of group decisions. II: in arbitrary spaces of fuzzy binary relations”. Fuzzy Sets and Syst. 4, 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi H. (1981). “Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations”. Fuzzy Sets and Syst. 6, 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regade R.K. (1976). “Fuzzy sets in communication systems and in consensus formation systems”. J. Cybern. 6, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regade R.K. (1977). “Profile transformation algebra and group consensus formation through fuzzy sets”. In: M.M. Gupta, G.N. Saridis and B.R. Gaines (eds.): Fuzzy Automata and Decision Processes. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 331–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillman B., J. Bezdek and R. Spillman (1979). “Coalition analysis with fuzzy sets”. Kybernetes 8, 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillman B., R. Spillman and J. Bezdek (1979). “Development of an instrument for the dynamic measurement of consensus”. Comm. Mono. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillman B., R. Spillman and J. Bezdek (1980). “A Fuzzy analysis of consensus in small groups”. In: P.P. Wang and S.K. Chang (eds.): Fuzzy Sets Theory and Applications to Policy Analysis and Information Systems. Plenum, New York, 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillman B., R. Spillman and J. Bezdek (1982). “A dynamic perspective on leadership; development of a fuzzy measurement procedure”. Fuzzy Sets and Syst. 7, 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanino T. (1984). “Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making”. Fuzzy Sets and Syst. 12, 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1979). “A theory of approximative reasoning”. In J.E. Hayes, M. Michie and L.I. Mikulich (eds.): Machine Intelligence 9, J. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1983). “A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages”. Comp. & Maths, with Appls. 9, 149–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fedrizzi, M., Kacprzyk, J. (1988). On Measuring Consensus in the Setting of Fuzzy Preference Relations. In: Kacprzyk, J., Roubens, M. (eds) Non-Conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 301. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51711-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51711-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-18954-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51711-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics