Abstract
This paper presents an evaluation of an economic policy optimization experiment using interactive methods of vector optimization. A medium sized nonlinear macroeconometric model for Austria is transformed to yield a set of linear constraints for macroeconomic policy optimization using a set of mainly fiscal and monetary instruments. To assess the practical impact of different methods and their implementation to support macroeconomic decision making, four techniques of vector optimization have been tested with participants in an experimental economic planning problem for the year 1989. The techniques based on linear programming are applied interactively and differ from each other in the information requirements and the conduct of the interaction. We consider the Step-Method (Benayoun et al. (1971)), Interactive Multiple Goal Programming (Spronk (1981)), a method proposed by Zionts and Wallenius (1976) — all contained in the optimization program IAO — together with the reference point approach, implemented in DIDAS (developed and provided to us by the International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg). People involved in practical economic policy decision making for Austria have been invited to participate in the experiment. Among them were members of the chamber of commerce, the ministry of finance, the national bank and members of the national council. A survey of the results achieved and a critical comparative evaluation is presented.
We would like to thank M. Luptáčik and P. Müller for discussion and J. Gruber for helpful comments to improve the paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ancot J. P., A. J. Hughes Hallett, J. H. P. Paelinck, The determination of implicit preferences — Possible approaches compared, European Economic Review 18 (1982), 267–289.
Ancot J. P., A. J. Hughes Hallett, Collective preferences in economic decision models: With an application to Soviet economic policy, in “Gruber, J. (ed.), Econometric Decision Models,” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 208, Springer-Verlag, 1983, pp. 263–304.
Benayoun R., J. de Montgolfier, J. Tergny, O. Larichev, Linear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method (STEM), Mathematical Programming 1 (3) (1971), 366–375.
Brandner P., Interaktive Verfahren für Optimierungsprobleme bei mehrfacher Zielsetzung — eine Anwendung in der Wirtschaftspolitik, Master Thesis, Institute for Econometrics and Operations Research, University of Technology, Vienna (1984).
Brandner P., Interaktive Vektoroptimierung zur Unterstützung der Entscheidungsfindung in der Wirtschaftspolitik, mimeo, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna (1985).
Brandner P., B. Böhm, Interactive Optimization. Manual for the IA0-Program Package, Research Report No. 95, Institute for Econometrics and Operations Research, University of Technology, Vienna (1989).
Brockhoff K., Experimental test of MODM algorithms in a modular approach, European Journal of Operational Research 22 (1985), 159–166.
Buchanan J. T., H. G. Daellenbach, A comperative evaluation of interactive solution methods for multiple objective decision models, European Journal of Operational Research 29 (1987), 353–359.
Chow G. C., “Analysis and Control of Dynamic Economic Systems,” Wiley, New York, 1975.
Deissenberg C., Interactive solution of multiple objective dynamic, macroeconomic stabilization problems. A comparative study, in “Gruber, J. (ed.), Econometric Decision Models,” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems Vol. 208, Springer-Verlag, 1983, pp. 305–309.
Despontin M., Regional multiple objective quantitative economic policy: a Belgian model, European Journal of Operational Research 10 (1982), 82–89.
Despontin M., J. Moscarola, J. Spronk, A User-oriented listing of multiple criteria decision methods, The Belgian Journal of Statistics, Computer Science and Operation Research 23 (4) (1983).
Despontin M., P. Nijkamp, J. Spronk, “Macro-Economic Planning with Conflicting Goals,” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems Vol. 230, Springer-Verlag, 1984.
Friedman B. M., “Economic Stabilization Policy: Methods in Optimization,” North Holland, 1975.
Frisch R., Numerical determination of a quadratic preference function for use in macro-economic programming, Giornale Degli Economisti a Annali Di Economia (1961).
Frisch R., “Economic Planning Studies,” International Studies in Economics and Econometrics Vol. 8, edited by F. Long, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1976.
Grauer M., A. P. Wierzbicki, “Interactive Decision Analysis,” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems Vol. 229, Springer-Verlag, 1984.
Gruber J. (ed.), “Econometric Decision Models,” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems Vol. 208, Springer-Verlag, 1983.
Gruber, J., Interactive vector optimization as a complement to optimal control in econometric models, chapter 5, in “C. Carraro and D. Sartore (eds.), Developments of Control Theory for Economic Analysis,” Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1987, pp. 63–82.
Hendry D. F., “The Econometrics of PC-GIVE,” Version 5.0, Oxford, 1987.
Hendry D. F., A. R. Pagan, J. D. Sargan, Dynamic specification, chapter 18, in “Z. Griliches and M.D. Intriligator (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics Vol. II,” Amsterdam, 1986, pp. 1025–1100.
Holly S., B. Rüstern, M. Zarrop (eds.), “Optimal Control for Econometric Models: An Approach to Economic Policy Formation,” Macmillan, London, 1979.
Hughes Hallett A., “Applied Decision Analysis and Economic Behaviour,” Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics 3, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1984.
Hughes Hallett A., H. Rees, “Quantitative Economic Policies and Interactive Planning,” Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Hwang C. L., A. S. M. Masud, “Multiple Objective Decision Making — Methods and Applications. A State-of-the-Art Survey,” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems Vol. 164, Springer-Verlag, 1979.
Johansen L., Establishing preference functions for macroeconomic decision models, European Economic Review 5 (1974), 41–66.
Müller P., Interactive Multiple Goal Programming (Pascal-Programm), Master Thesis, Institute for Econometrics and Operations Research, University of Technology, Vienna (1985).
Olbrisch, M., “Das interaktive Referenzpunktverfahren als Lösungsmöglichkeit ökonometrischer Entscheidungsmodelle — Darstellung und Einordnung der Theorie und praktische Anwendungen,” Bochumer Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Studien Nr. 121, Studienverlag Brockmeyer, Bochum, 1988.
Pitchford J. D., S. J. Turnovsky (eds.), “Application of Control Theory to Economic Analysis,” North Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.
Preston A. J., A dynamic generalization of Tinbergen’s theory of policy, Review of Economic Studies 41 (1) (1974), 65–74.
Preston A. J., Existence, uniqueness and stability of linear optimal stabilisation policies, in “J. D. Pitchford, S.J. Turnovsky (eds.), Application of Control Theory to Economic Analysis,” North Holland, Amsterdam, 1977, pp. 255–292.
Preston A. J., A. R. Pagan, “The Theory of Economic Policy,” Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Preston A. J., E. Sieper, Policy objectives and instrument requirements for a dynamic theory of policy, in “J. D. Pitchford, S. J. Turnovsky (eds.), Application of Control Theory to Economic Analysis,” North Holland, Amsterdam, 1977, pp. 215–254.
Rogowski T., J. Sobczyk, A. P. Wierzbicki, IAC-DIDAS-L Dynamic Interactive Decision Analysis and support System Linear Version, Working Paper WP-88–110, IIASA, Laxenburg (1988).
Russel C. S., V. K. Smith, Targets, instruments and generalized inverses, European Economic Review 6 (1975), 143–153.
Spronk J., “Interactive Multiple Goal Programming for Capital Budgeting and Financial Planning,” Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston, 1981.
Streuff, H., J. Gruber, The interactive multiobjective optimization method by Elemer E. Rosinger: A computer program and Aspects of Applications, in “Gruber, J. (ed.), Econometric Decision Models,” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems Vol. 208, Springer-Verlag, 1983, pp. 334–364.
Theil H., “Optimal Decision Rules for Government and Industry,” North Holland, 1964.
Tinbergen J., “On the Theory of Economic Policy,” North Holland, 1952.
Tinbergen J., “Economic Policy, Principles and Design,” North Holland, 1956.
Wallenius H., Optimizing macroeconomic policy: A review of approaches and applications, European Journal of Operations Research 10 (1982), 221–228.
Wallenius J., Comparative evaluation of some interactive approaches to multicriteria optimization, Management Science 21 (1975), 1387–1396.
Zionts S., J. Wallenius, An interactive programming method for solving the multiple criteria problem, Management Science 22 (6) (1976), 652–663.
Zionts S., J. Wallenius, An interactive multiple linear programming method for a class of underlying nonlinear utility functions, Management Science 29 (5) (1953), 519–529.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Böhm, B., Brandner, P. (1991). Optimal Economic Policy Making With an Econometric Model Using Interactive Methods of Vector Optimization. In: Gruber, J. (eds) Econometric Decision Models. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 366. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51675-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51675-7_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54373-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51675-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive