Advertisement

General Methodology and Problems in Assessment of Decision Support Systems

  • R. P. A. M. Smeets
  • J. L. Talmon
  • R. O’Moore
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics book series (LNMED, volume 40)

Abstract

The development of knowledge based systems (KBSs) is facing the same problem as conventional software has been facing in the past. Obtaining the requirements (conditions or capabilities needed by the user to solve a problem or obtain an objective) and the specifications (contractual definitions of the system based on analysis of the user requirements) from the user has been one of the main problems in conventional software development. Proper system analysis and structured design have alleviated part of these problems [1]. By combining structured design methods such as KADS [2] with appropriate parts of conventional software design methodologies will at least be a good starting point for getting the specifications right. Since the system can not be better than the specifications the assessment of the system should start at an as early phase of the development as possible and hence be an integrated part of system development.

Keywords

Decision Support System User Requirement Software Testing System Life Cycle Conventional Software 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. 1).
    Yourdon E.; Managing the system life cycle, Yourdon Press, Englewood Cliffs, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    Breaker J., Wielinga B.; Model driven knowledge acquisition, interpretation models, Deliverable Task A1 Esprit Project 1098, Dept. Social Science Informatics, University of Amsterdam, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. 3).
    Miller E.; Introduction to software testing technology, in Software testing and validation techniques, ed. Miller, IEEE Computer Society Press, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
  4. 4).
    Boehm B.W.; Software engineering economics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1981.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5).
    Green C.J. Keyes M.M.; Verification and validation of expert systems, Proceedings of the Western Conference on Expert Systems, California 1987.Google Scholar
  6. 6).
    DeMillo R.A., McCracken W.M., Passafiume J.F.; Software testing and evaluation, The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc. Menlo Park, 1987.Google Scholar
  7. 7).
    Cochran E.L, Hutchins B.L.; Testing, verifying and releasing an expert system; the case history of Mentor, Proceedings 3rd Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications, Hyatt Orlando, 1987.Google Scholar
  8. 8).
    Deutsch M.S., Willis R.R.; Software quality engineering, a total technical and management approach, Prentice-Hall Series in Software Engineering, ed. Jensen, Englewood Cliffs, 1988.Google Scholar
  9. 9).
    SYDPOL-5 Working Group; Issues on the evaluation of computer-based support to clinical decision making, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. 10).
    O’Moore R., Clarke K., Smeets R., Brender J., Nykaenen P., McNair P.; Items of relevance for the evaluation of knowledge based/expert systems and influence from domain characteristics, Report EM-1.1 of the KAVAS Project, (A1021) Advanced Informatics in Medicine (AIM).Google Scholar
  11. 11).
    Brender J., Larsen H.L, Nonfjall H.; VALID, validation methods and tools for knowledge based systems, Report Esprit 2, 2148, 1989.Google Scholar
  12. 12).
    Ratcliff B.; Reliability and quality control, in Software engineering, priciples and methods, Blackwell Scientific Publications 1987.Google Scholar
  13. 13).
    Sackett D.L, Haynes R.B., Tugwell P.; Clinical epidemiology, a basic science for clinical medicine Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1985.Google Scholar
  14. 14).
    Bjerregaard B.S.; Computer aided diagnosis of the acute abdomen: a system from Leeds used on Copenhagen patients in Decision making and medical care ed: Gremy F. de Dombal FT. North Holland, 1976.Google Scholar
  15. 15).
    Nolan J., Brender J., McNair P., Vingtoft S.; Approaches to identify factors influencing transferability of medical DSSs Report: TRANS-1.1 of the KAVAS Project, (A1021) Advanced Informatics in Medicine (AIM).Google Scholar
  16. 16).
    Kaplan B.; Impact of clinical laboratory computer systems: user’s perceptions, Proceedings of Medinfo 86, Elsevier Science Publishers b.v., 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. P. A. M. Smeets
    • 1
  • J. L. Talmon
    • 2
  • R. O’Moore
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyUniversity of LimburgMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Medical Informatics and StatisticsUniversity of LimburgThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Central Laboratories, St. James HospitalTrinity College DublinIreland

Personalised recommendations