Skip to main content

Markup Differentials, Cost Flexibility, and Capacity Utilization in West-German Manufacturing

  • Conference paper
Studies in Applied Econometrics

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

  • 78 Accesses

Abstract

The empirical analysis of the relationship between pricing behaviour and market structure has a distinguished tradition in industrial economics. The size of markups of price over marginal or average costs has been the traditional indicator for market power in most empirical studies usually based on a cross-section of industries (for a survey see Schmalensee 1989). The standard explanation given for inter-industry differences in markups has usually been the existence of entry barriers arising from scale economies (see Scherer 1980 for a survey). Although no concurring opinion on the proper interpretation or even the existence of a positive relationship between industry markups and market concentration seems to have emerged so far, it remains the basis for the predominance of the structure-conduct-performance paradigm in empirical industrial economics (see Schmalensee 1989 for a comprehensive survey). A related issue that has been extensively investigated within this approach is the cyclical variation in markups and prices and its dependence on market structure (see Scherer 1980, Ch. 13, Carlton 1989) although here too, judging from the literature, no unambiguous results seem to be available.

We thank Klaus Conrad, our discussant at the Second Munich Applied Econometrics Workshop, for helpful comments and Georg Licht for numerous useful discussions and for providing essential data. Helpful suggestions were also received from seminar participants at the University of Augsburg, the University of Munich and the Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO), Vienna.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aiginger, Karl, “Investitionsverhalten und Marktstruktur — Empirische Ergebnisse für Österreich”, in B. Gahlen (ed.), Marktstruktur und gesamtwirtschaftliche Entwicklung (Heidelberg: Springer, 1990), 127–152.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, Elie, “The Estimation of the Degree of Oligopoly Power,” Journal of Econometrics 19 (1982), 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arz, Stefan, Preisflexibilität, Konzentration und Risikoeinstellung (Frankfurt am Main etc.: Peter Lang, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, Ernst R., Melvyn A. Fuss, “Productivity Measurement with Adjustments for Variations in Capacity Utilization and other Forms of Temporary Equilibrium”, Journal of Econometrics 33 (1986), 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, Ernst R., Catherine Morrison and G. Campbell Watkins, “Dynamic Models of Energy Demand: An Assessment and Comparison”, in E. R. Berndt and B. C. Fields (eds.), Modeling and Measuring Natural Resource Substitution (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981), 259–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bils, Mark, “The Cyclical Behavior of Marginal Cost and Price”, American Economic Review 77 (Dec. 1987), 838–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borooah, V.K., and F. van der Ploeg, “Oligopoly Power in British Industry,” Applied Economics 18 (1986), 583–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, Timothy F., “Empirical Studies of Industries with Market Power,” in R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization Vol. II (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1989), 1011–1057.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, Dennis W., “The Theory and the Facts of how Markets Clear: Is Industrial Organization Valuabe for Understanding Macroeconomics?”, in R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization Vol. I (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, Richard E., “International Trade and Industrial Organization”, European Economic Review 28 (1985), 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Robert G., Applied Production Analysis. A Dual Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, Klaus, “Kapazitätsauslastung und Wohlfahrtsverluste in der westdeutschen Stahlindustrie,” in W. Franz, W. Gaab and J. Wolters (ed.), Theoretische und angewandte Wirtschaftsforschung. H. König zum 60. Geburtstag (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, Klaus, “Tests for Optimizing Behavior and for Patterns of Conjectural Variations”, Kyklos 42 (1989), 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, Klaus and Ralph Unger, “Ex Post Tests for Short- and Long-Run Optimization”, Journal of Econometrics 36 (1987), 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Stephan, “Concentration”, in St. Davis and B. Lyons (ed.), Surveys in Economics: Economics of Industrial Organisation, Chapter 3, (London: Longman, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. Erwin and Terence J. Wales, “Flexible Functional Forms and Global Curvature Conditions”, Econometrica 55(1,1987), 43–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domowitz, Ian, R. Glenn Hubbard, and Bruce C. Petersen, “Oligopoly Supergames: Some Empirical Evidence on Prices and Margins”, The Journal of Industrial Economics 35 (June 1987), 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domowitz, Ian, R. Glenn Hubbard, and Bruce C. Petersen, “Market Structure and Cyclical Fluctuations in U.S. Manufacturing”, Review Econ. Statistics 70 (Feb. 1988), 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gahlen, Bernhard, Andrew J. Buck and Stefan Arz, “Ökonomische Indikatoren in Verbindung mit der Konzentration”, in G. Bombach, B. Gahlen and A. E. Ott (eds.), Indusstrieökonomik (Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 1985), 127–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul A., “In Pursuit of Monopoly Power: Recent Quantitative Work in Industrial Economics”, Journal of Applied Econometrics 3 (1988), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstenberger, Wolfgang, Johannes Heinze, Marlies Hummel and Kurt Vogler-Ludwig, Sektorale Kapitalbildung in der deutschen Wirtschaft nach Eigentümer- und Benutzerkonzept (Munich: IFO Institute for Economic Research, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Robert E., “Market Structure and Macroeconomic Fluctuations”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (2,1986), 285–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Robert E., “The Relation between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry”, Journal of Political Economy 96 (5,1988), 921–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Gerd, “Faktorsubstitution in den Wirtschaftssektoren der Bundesrepublik,” DIW-Vierteljahreshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung (1983), 169–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, Hans and Lutz Reyher, Arbeitszeit und Arbeitsvolumen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1960–1986, BeitrAB 123, (Nurenberg: Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul R., “Industrial Organization and International Trade”, in R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization Vol. II (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilaka, Nalin, “Tests on the Validity of Static Equilibrium Models”, Journal of Econometrics 28 (1985), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Lawrence J., “A Characterization of the Normalized Restricted Profit Function,” Journal of Economic Theory 12 (1976), 131–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, Bruce, “Barriers to Entry”, in St. Davis and B. Lyons (ed.), Surveys in Economics: Economics of Industrial Organisation, Chapter 2, (London: Longman, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Catherine J., “Primal and Dual Capacity Utilization: An Application to Productivity Measurement in the U.S. Automobile Industry,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 3 (1985), 312–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Catherine J., “Quasi-fixed Inputs in U.S. and Japanese Manufactoring: A Generalized Leontief Restricted Cost Function Approach,” Review of Economics and Statistics (1988, a), 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Catherine J., “Capacity Utilization and Productivity Measurement: An Application to the U.S. Automobile Industry,” in A. Dogramaci and R. Fare (ed.), Applications of Modern Production Theory: Efficiency and Productivity (Boston: Kluwer, 1988, b), 163–194.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Shinichiro, “A Dynamic Multisectoral Model of Production, Investment and Prices Based on Flexible Cost Functions,” DIW-Vierteljahreshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung (1986), 110–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Manfred, Ingo Böbel and Alfred Haid, “Konzentration, Außenhandel und Marktergebnis” in G. Bombach, B. Gahlen and A. E. Ott (eds.), Industrieökonomik (Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 1985), 169–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, Stephen, “Imperfect Competition and the Labour Market”, in M. Beenstock (ed.), Modelling the Labour Market (London: Chapman and Hall 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Mark J., “Testing Oligopolistic Behavior,” International Journal of Industrial Organization 2 (1984), 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, Paul M. “Crazy Explanations for the Productivity Slowdown”, in S. Fischer (ed.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1987,163–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutner, Dieter, Faktorsubstitution in den Produktionssektoren der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Eine ökonometrische Analyse anhand des Translog-Modells, 1981–1980, (Frankfurt: Haag + Herchen Verlag, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schankerman, Mark, and M. Ishag Nadiri, “A Test of Static Equilibrium Models and Rates of Return to Quasi-fixed Factors, with an Application to the Bell System,” Journal of Econometrics 33 (1986), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (Chicago; Rand McNally, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, Richard, “Inter-Industry Studies of Structure and Performance,” in R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization Vol. II (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1989), 951–1009.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Ernst, “Faktoieinsatzverhalten im verarbeitenden Gewerbe. Eine sektorale Analyse unter Verwendung eines Translog-Modells”, Viertelsjahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung (1/2 1988), 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt, Produzierendes Gewerbe. Fachserie 4, Reihe S.9., Konzentrationsstatistische Daten für den Bergbau und das Verarbeitende Gewerbe 1954 bis 1982 (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Flaig, G., Steiner, V. (1993). Markup Differentials, Cost Flexibility, and Capacity Utilization in West-German Manufacturing. In: Schneeweiß, H., Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Studies in Applied Econometrics. Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51514-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51514-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0716-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51514-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics