Skip to main content

Goodness of Fit in Qualitative Choice Models: Review and Evaluation

  • Conference paper
Studies in Applied Econometrics

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Abstract

Qualitative choice models are now widely used in economics. However, widely accepted measures evaluating the goodness of fit, predictive quality, or overall-success of such models do not exist, although many approaches have been suggested. Some measures are based on the likelihood-ratio test statistic, while others evaluate the residuals of the qualitative choice regressions, or use prediction-realization tables for analysis. Some measures are discussed in Amemiya (1981), Maddala (1983), Aldrich and Nelson (1984), Judge, Griffiths, Hill, Lütkepohl and Lee (1985) and Greene (1990), but these reviews are far from being complete.

A research draft on methods for the binary probit model covered by this paper was given at the First Munich Applied Econometrics Workshop in July 1989. This paper is an extended and completely revised version of it. I wish to thank Gerhard Arminger, Gebhard Flaig and François Laisney for many useful comments, John De New for excellent research assistance, and the German Science Foundation (DFG) for financial support. The paper was completed when I was visiting CentER, Tilburg University, in April 1990.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ALDRICH, J. H., NELSON, F. D. (1984): Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills: Sage University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMEMIYA, T. (1980): “Selection of Regressors”. International Economic Review, 21, 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AMEMIYA, T. (1981): “Qualitative Response Models: A Survey,” Journal of Economic Literature, 19, 1483–1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANDERSON, P., BAUER, R. K., FELS, E. (1954): On the Accuracy of Short-Term Entrepreneurial Expectations, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • BISHOP, Y. M. M., FIENBERG, S. E., HOLLAND, P. W. (1975): Discrete Multivariate Analysis, Cambridge, Mass., London, England

    Google Scholar 

  • CRAGG, J. G., UHLER, R. (1970): “The Demand for Automobiles,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 3, 386–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRAMER, H. (1946): Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • DHRYMES, P. J. (1986): “Limited Dependent Variables,” in Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. III, ed. by Z. Griliches and M. D. Intriligator, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • EFRON B. (1978): “Regression and Anova with Zero-One Data: Measures of Residual Variation,” Journal of American Statistical Association, 73, 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • FOMBY, T. B., HILL R. C., JOHNSON, S. R. (1984): Advanced Econometric Methods. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • GOLDBERGER, A. S. (1973): “Correlations Between Binary Choices and Probabilistic Predictions,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68, 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOODMAN, L. A., KRUSKAL, W. H. (1954): “Measures of Association for Cross Classifications,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOODMAN, L. A., KRUSKAL, W. H. (1974a): “Empirical Evaluation of Formal Theory,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 3, 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOODMAN, L. A., KRUSKAL, W. H. (1974b): “More About Empirical Evaluation of Formal Theory,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 3, 211–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREENE, W. H. (1990): Econometric Analysis. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAUSER, J. R. (1977): “Testing the Accuracy, Usefulness and Significance of Probabilistic Choice Models: An Information Theoretic Approach,” Operations Research, 26, 406–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HILDEBRAND, D. K., LAING, J. D., ROSENTHAL, H. L. (1974a): “Prediction Logic: A Method for Empirical Evaluation of Formal Theory,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 3, 163–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HILDEBRAND, D. K., LAING, J. D., ROSENTHAL, H. L. (1974b): “Prediction Logic and Quasi-lndependence in Empirical Evaluation of Formal Theory,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 3, 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JUDGE, G. G., GRIFFITHS, W. E., HILL, R. C., LÜTKEPOHL, H., LEE, T.-C. (1985): The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAWASAKI, S., MCMILLAN, J., ZIMMERMANN, K. F. (1983): “Inventories and Price Inflexibility,” Econometrica, 51, 599–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KAWASAKI, S., ZIMMERMANN, K. F. (1986): “Testing the Rationality of Price Expectations for Manufacturing Firms,” Applied Economics, 18, 1335–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LAVE, C. A. (1970): “The Demand for Urban Mass Transportation,” Review of Economics and STATISTICS, 37, 320–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MADDALA, G. S. (1983): Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCFADDEN, D. (1973): “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior,” in Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. by P. Zarembka. New York: Academic Press, 105–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCKELVEY, R., ZAVOINA, W. (1975): “A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal Level Dependent Variables” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4, 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MORRISON, D. G. (1972): “Upper Bounds for Correlation Between Binary Outcomes and Probabilistic Predictions,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 68–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • NETER, J., MAYNES, E. S. (1970): “Correlation Coefficient with a 0,1 Dependent Variable,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 501–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1966): Applied Economic Forecasting, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • VEALL, M. R., ZIMMERMANN, K. F. (1990a): Evaluating Pseudo R2’s for Binary Probit Models, mimeo. Forthcoming 1993: Quality Er Quantity. International Journal of Methodology.

    Google Scholar 

  • VEALL, M. R., ZIMMERMANN, K. F. (1990b): Goodness of Fit Measures in the Tobit Model, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • VEALL, M. R., ZIMMERMANN, K. F. (1992a): “Pseudo R2’s in the Ordinal Probit Model,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 16, 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VEALL, M. R., ZIMMERMANN, K. F. (1992b): “Performance Measures from Prediction — Realization Tables,” Economics Letters, 39, 129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZIMMERMANN, K. F. (1986a): “On Rationality of Business Expectations: A Micro Analysis of Qualitative Responses,” Empirical Economics, 11, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZIMMERMANN, K. F. (1986b): “Multivariate Micro Prediction Analysis of Qualitative Models,” in Methods of Operations Research, 53, ed. by K. W. Gaede, K. Ritter and H. Schneeweiß, 683–696.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zimmermann, K.F. (1993). Goodness of Fit in Qualitative Choice Models: Review and Evaluation. In: Schneeweiß, H., Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Studies in Applied Econometrics. Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51514-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51514-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0716-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51514-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics