Introduction: Historical Remarks
What is maximized by natural selection? A general answer is the expected reproductive success of the individual; i.e. mean individual fitness. This basic fitness maximization principle underlies much of the modern evolutionary theory of adaptation (Fisher 1930, Williams 1966, Maynard Smith 1978). Criticism of the hypothesis of fitness maximization has, however, also been widespread (e.g. Dupré 1987).
KeywordsMigration Haldane Hedging
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dupré, J. (ed.). 1987. The Latest on the Best: Essays in Evolution and Optimality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Fisher, R.A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Levins, R. 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
- Mangel, M. and C.W. Clark. 1988. Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
- Monod, J. 1971. Chance and necessity. Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
- Roughgarden, J. 1979. Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: an Introduction. MacMillan, New York.Google Scholar
- Schoener, T.W. and D.A. Spiller. 1987. High population persistence in a system with high turnover, Science 330: 470–477.Google Scholar
- Seger, J. and J. Brockmann. 1987. What is bet-hedging? Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology. 4: 182–411.Google Scholar
- Slatkin, M. 1974. Hedging one’s evolutionary bets, Nature 250: 704–705.Google Scholar
- Stephens, D.W. and J.R. Krebs. 1986. Foraging Theory. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
- Williams, G.C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
- Yoshimura, J. and W.M. Shields. 1992. Components of uncertainty in clutch-size optimization, Bull. Math. Biol. 54: 445–464.Google Scholar