Abstract
In the past decade, measurement of fatigue has become an important quality of life issue, especially in the field of nursing (Winningham and Nail 1994). Lack of clarification of the concept has led to difficulties in its measurement. Studies about prevalence, correlates and possible causes are difficult to compare owing to methodological differences (Piper 1993). A review of currently available fatigue measurement instruments has led to the conclusion that for the purpose of epidemiological research with the aim of measuring the experience of fatigue in a general cancer patient population, no valid instrument is available. Previously conducted, unstructured interviews with cancer patients and healthy individuals (above) therefore formed the basis of the analysis of the descriptors of fatigue from the perspective of those concerned. These descriptors were compared with items in available instruments and then used to construct a self-report Fatigue Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ). Construction of this scale has been described in the last chapter. As only research conducted with reliability- and validity-tested instruments can be successful, the FAQ now needs to be scientifically tested.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blesch K, Paice J (1991) Correlates of fatigue in breast or lung cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 18:81–87
Bortz J (1985) Lehrbuch der Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer, BerHn Heidelberg New York
Chalder T, Berelowitz T (1993) Development of a fatigue scale. J Psychosom Res 37 (2):147- 153
Field P, Morse J (1985) Nursing research. The application of qualitative approaches. Chapman and Hall, London
Glaus A (1996) A qualitative study to explore the concept of fatigue/tiredness in cancer patients and in healthy individuals. Support Care Cancer 4:82–96
Cuba E, Lincoln J (1981) Effective evaluation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Herrmann C, Scholz K (1991) Psychologisches Screening von Patienten einer kardiologischen Akutklinik mit einer deutschen Fassung der Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Skala. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 41:83–92
Holmes S (1991) Preliminary investigation of symptom distress in two cancer patient populations: evaluation of a measurement instrument. J Adv Nurs 16:439–446
Huisman S, van Dam F (1987) On measuring complaints of cancer patients: some remarks on the time span question. In: Aaronson N, Beckmann J (eds) The quality of life of cancer patients. Raven, New York
Hürny C, Bernhard J (1993) Fatigue and malaise as quality of life indicator in small-cell lung cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 1:316–320
Jones D, Feyers P, Simons J, et al (1987) Measuring and analysing quality of life in cancer cUnical trials: a review. In: Aaronson N, Beckmann J (eds) The quality of life in cancer patients. Raven, New York, pp 41–61
Karnofsky D, Burchenal J (1949) Clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Macleod C (ed) Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. Columbia University Press, New York
Kobashi J, Hanewald G (1985) Assessment of malaise in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Cancer Nurs 12:306–313
McCorkle R, Young K (1978) Development of a symptom distress scale. Cancer Nurs 10:373–378
McNair D, Lorr M (1971) FITS manual for the profile f mood states. Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego
Mock V, Burke M (in press) A nursing rehabilitation programme for women with breast cancer on adjuvant chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum
Nerenz D, Leventhal H (1982) Factors contributing to emotional distress during cancer chemotherapy. Cancer 50:1020–1027
Nigel G (1993) Analyzing tabular data. UCL, London
Oppenheim A (1992) Questionnaire design, Interviewing and attitude measurement. Pinter, London
Pearson P, Byars G (1956) The development and validation of a checklist measuring subjective fatigue (report no 56–115). School of Aviation, Randolph AFB, TX
Pickard-Holley S (1991) Fatigue in cancer patients. Cancer Nurs 14 (1):13–19
Piper B (1992) Subjective fatigue in women receiving six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Francisco. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services (no 9303553)
Piper B (1993) Fatigue. In: Carrieri V, Lindsey A (eds) Pathophysiological phenomena in nursing: human response to illness. Saunders, Philadelphia
Piper B, Lindsey A (1989) The development of an instrument to measure the subjective dimension of fatigue. In: Funk S, Tornquist A (eds) Key aspects of comfort. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Polit D, Hungler B (1993) Nursing research, principles and methods. Lippincott, Philadelphia
Schag C, Heinrich R (1984) Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity and guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2 (3):187–193
St Pierre P, Kaspar C (1992) Fatigue mechanisms in patients with cancer: effects of tumour necrosis factor and exercise on skeletal muscle. Oncol Nurs Forum 19:419–425
Van Dam F, Linssen A (1984) Evaluating quality of life: behavioural measures in clinical trials. In: Buyse M, Staquet M (eds) Cancer chnical trials: method and practice. Oxford University Press, New York
Winningham M (1991) Walking programme for people with cancer: Getting started. Cancer Nurs 14:270–276
Winningham M, Nail M (1994) Fatigue and the cancer experience: the state of the knowledge. Oncol Nurs Forum 21 (l):23–36
Yoshitake H (1971) Relations between the symptoms and feelings of fatigue. Ergonomics 14:175–186
Zigmond A, Snaith R (1983) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glaus, A. (1998). Testing the Fatigue Assessment Questionnaire in Healthy Persons and in Cancer Patients. In: Fatigue in Patients with Cancer. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 145. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51466-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51466-1_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-51468-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51466-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive