Skip to main content

Testing the Fatigue Assessment Questionnaire in Healthy Persons and in Cancer Patients

  • Chapter
Fatigue in Patients with Cancer

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 145))

Abstract

In the past decade, measurement of fatigue has become an important quality of life issue, especially in the field of nursing (Winningham and Nail 1994). Lack of clarification of the concept has led to difficulties in its measurement. Studies about prevalence, correlates and possible causes are difficult to compare owing to methodological differences (Piper 1993). A review of currently available fatigue measurement instruments has led to the conclusion that for the purpose of epidemiological research with the aim of measuring the experience of fatigue in a general cancer patient population, no valid instrument is available. Previously conducted, unstructured interviews with cancer patients and healthy individuals (above) therefore formed the basis of the analysis of the descriptors of fatigue from the perspective of those concerned. These descriptors were compared with items in available instruments and then used to construct a self-report Fatigue Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ). Construction of this scale has been described in the last chapter. As only research conducted with reliability- and validity-tested instruments can be successful, the FAQ now needs to be scientifically tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Blesch K, Paice J (1991) Correlates of fatigue in breast or lung cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 18:81–87

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bortz J (1985) Lehrbuch der Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer, BerHn Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalder T, Berelowitz T (1993) Development of a fatigue scale. J Psychosom Res 37 (2):147- 153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Field P, Morse J (1985) Nursing research. The application of qualitative approaches. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaus A (1996) A qualitative study to explore the concept of fatigue/tiredness in cancer patients and in healthy individuals. Support Care Cancer 4:82–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuba E, Lincoln J (1981) Effective evaluation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann C, Scholz K (1991) Psychologisches Screening von Patienten einer kardiologischen Akutklinik mit einer deutschen Fassung der Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Skala. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 41:83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes S (1991) Preliminary investigation of symptom distress in two cancer patient populations: evaluation of a measurement instrument. J Adv Nurs 16:439–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman S, van Dam F (1987) On measuring complaints of cancer patients: some remarks on the time span question. In: Aaronson N, Beckmann J (eds) The quality of life of cancer patients. Raven, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hürny C, Bernhard J (1993) Fatigue and malaise as quality of life indicator in small-cell lung cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 1:316–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones D, Feyers P, Simons J, et al (1987) Measuring and analysing quality of life in cancer cUnical trials: a review. In: Aaronson N, Beckmann J (eds) The quality of life in cancer patients. Raven, New York, pp 41–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnofsky D, Burchenal J (1949) Clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Macleod C (ed) Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobashi J, Hanewald G (1985) Assessment of malaise in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Cancer Nurs 12:306–313

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorkle R, Young K (1978) Development of a symptom distress scale. Cancer Nurs 10:373–378

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair D, Lorr M (1971) FITS manual for the profile f mood states. Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock V, Burke M (in press) A nursing rehabilitation programme for women with breast cancer on adjuvant chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerenz D, Leventhal H (1982) Factors contributing to emotional distress during cancer chemotherapy. Cancer 50:1020–1027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nigel G (1993) Analyzing tabular data. UCL, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim A (1992) Questionnaire design, Interviewing and attitude measurement. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson P, Byars G (1956) The development and validation of a checklist measuring subjective fatigue (report no 56–115). School of Aviation, Randolph AFB, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickard-Holley S (1991) Fatigue in cancer patients. Cancer Nurs 14 (1):13–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piper B (1992) Subjective fatigue in women receiving six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Francisco. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services (no 9303553)

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper B (1993) Fatigue. In: Carrieri V, Lindsey A (eds) Pathophysiological phenomena in nursing: human response to illness. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper B, Lindsey A (1989) The development of an instrument to measure the subjective dimension of fatigue. In: Funk S, Tornquist A (eds) Key aspects of comfort. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Polit D, Hungler B (1993) Nursing research, principles and methods. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Schag C, Heinrich R (1984) Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity and guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2 (3):187–193

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • St Pierre P, Kaspar C (1992) Fatigue mechanisms in patients with cancer: effects of tumour necrosis factor and exercise on skeletal muscle. Oncol Nurs Forum 19:419–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dam F, Linssen A (1984) Evaluating quality of life: behavioural measures in clinical trials. In: Buyse M, Staquet M (eds) Cancer chnical trials: method and practice. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Winningham M (1991) Walking programme for people with cancer: Getting started. Cancer Nurs 14:270–276

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winningham M, Nail M (1994) Fatigue and the cancer experience: the state of the knowledge. Oncol Nurs Forum 21 (l):23–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshitake H (1971) Relations between the symptoms and feelings of fatigue. Ergonomics 14:175–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zigmond A, Snaith R (1983) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glaus, A. (1998). Testing the Fatigue Assessment Questionnaire in Healthy Persons and in Cancer Patients. In: Fatigue in Patients with Cancer. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 145. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51466-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51466-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-51468-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51466-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics