Skip to main content

An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set

  • Conference paper
New Approaches in Classification and Data Analysis

Summary

A problem common to all clustering techniques is the difficulty of deciding the number of clusters present in the data. The aim of this paper is to compare three methods based on the hypervolume criterion with four other well-known methods. This evaluation of procedures for determining the number of clusters is conducted on artificial data sets. To provide a variety of solutions the data sets are analysed by six clustering methods. We finally conclude by pointing out the performance of each method and by giving some guidance for making choices between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ANDERBERG, M.R. (1973): Cluster Analysis for Applications. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOCK, H.H. (1985): On some significance tests in cluster analysis. Journal of Classification, 2, 77–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIDAY, E. et Collaborateurs (1979): Optimisation en Classification Automatique. INRIA, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • EVERITT, B. (1980): Cluster analysis. Halsted Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • GORDON, A.D. (1981): Classification. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARDY, A., and RASSON, J.P. (1982): Une nouvelle approche des problèmes de classification automatique. Statistique et Analyse des données, 7, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARDY, A. (1983): Une nouvelle approche des problèmes de classification automatique. Un modèle — Un nouveau critère — Des algorithmes — Des applications. Ph.D Thesis, F.U.N.D.P., Namur, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARDY, A. (1993): Criteria for determining the number of groups in a data set based on the hypervolume criterion. Technical report, FUNDP, Namur, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOORE, M. (1984): On the estimation of a convex set. The Annals of Statistics, 12, 3, 1090–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NEVEU, J. (1974): Processus ponctuels. Technical report, Laboratoire de Calcul des Probabilités, Université Paris VI.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIPLEY, B.D., and RASSON, J.P. (1977): Finding the edge of a Poisson Forest. Journal of Applied Probability, 14, 483–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WISHART, D. (1978): CLUSTAN User Manual, 3rd ed., Program Library Unit, University of Edimburgh.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hardy, A. (1994). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. In: Diday, E., Lechevallier, Y., Schader, M., Bertrand, P., Burtschy, B. (eds) New Approaches in Classification and Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51175-2_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51175-2_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58425-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51175-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics