Drag Reduction in Surfactant Solutions
Drag reducing surfactant solutions are characterized by the presence of rod-like micelles which are formed by single surfactant molecules above a characteristic concentration. This critical micelle concentration strongly depends on the temperature and the electrolyte concentration. Shear viscosity measurements of drag reducing surfactant solutions show that at shear rates above a critical value the viscosity suddenly increases due to the formation of a shear-induced state (SIS) in which the micelles coalescence to larger structures and are completely aligned in flow direction. The turbulent friction behaviour of these surfactant solutions is characterized by a critical wall-shear stress. The observed loss of drag reduction beyond this critical wall-shear stress is reversible.
Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) experiments demonstrate that the alignment of the rod-like micelles in flow direction correlates with drag reduction. At low Reynolds numbers in the turbulent flow regime the dimensionless velocity profiles are very similar to those observed in dilute polymer solutions, whereas at maximum drag reduction conditions the shape of the profiles is similar to a laminar profile. The axial turbulence intensity is increased whereas the transverse turbulence intensity and the Reynolds shear stresses are strongly damped. An attempt is made to explain theses changes by an increased effective viscosity.
KeywordsVortex Surfactant Anisotropy Torque Bromide
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Mysels KJ (1949) US Patent 2 492 173Google Scholar
- Myska J, Slanec K (1980) Acta Polytechnica 11:57Google Scholar
- Ohlendorf D, Interthal W, Hoffmann H (1984) Intern Congr Rheology, Mexico, 2:41, Elsevier Sei Publ, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Wells CS (1969) in: White A (ed) Viscous Drag Reduction, 297, Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Bewersdorff HW, Ohlendorf D (1985) Proc 5 symp on Turbulent Shear Flows, Ithaca, 9:41.Google Scholar
- Mukerjee P, Mysels KJ (1971) Critical micelle concentration of aqueous solutions, NRRDS-BBS, No. 36, USAGoogle Scholar
- Hoffmann H, Platz G, Rehage H, Schorr W, Ulbricht W (1980) Ber Bunsenges Phys Chem 85:2255Google Scholar
- Löbl M, Thum H, Hoffmann H (1984) Ber Bunsenges Phys Chem 88:1102Google Scholar
- Vissmann K, Bewersdorff HW (1989) Intern Conf Drag Reduction, Davos, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Povkh IL, Stupin AV, Aslanov PV (1988) Fluid Mech-Sov Res 17:65Google Scholar
- Povkh IL, Stupin AB, Maksjutenko SN, Aslanov PV, Simonenko AP (1980) in: Mekhanika turbulentnykh potokov, Moscow, pp. 44–69Google Scholar
- Aslanov PV, Maksjutenko SN, Povkh IL, Simonenko AP, Stupin AB (1980) Izv Akad Nauk SSR, Mekh Zhidk Gaza, pp. 36–43Google Scholar
- Povkh IL, Stupin AB, Maksjutenko SN, Aslanov PV, Roshchin EA, Tur AN, (1975) Inzh Fiz ZH 29:522Google Scholar
- Giesekus H (1981) Structure of turbulence in drag reducing fluids, Lecture Series 1981–86, Von Kórmén-Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Rhode-Saint-Genèse, BelgiumGoogle Scholar