Skip to main content

Nomenklatura, state monopoly, and private enterprise

  • Chapter
  • 55 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Contemporary Economics ((CONTEMPORARY))

Abstract

So far attention has been focused on the determinants of self-employment in Western market economies. In this chapter we shift our attention to the centrally planned economies of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet republics.1 In particular, we investigate political economic conditions that may stimulate or inhibit a transition from a centrally planned economy to a market economy. These conditions can be seen as possible determinants of self-employment, as self-employment is only allowed in a market economy. In our analysis we use a general-equilibrium model of the kind presented in Chapters 2 and 3 of this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The chapter is based on Van Winden and De Wit (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. An exception is Day (1982). Day focuses on the historical problem of the transition from manorial ism and tries to provide an endogenous explanation of how the switch in socioeconomic regime may have occurred through the interaction of population growth and economic productivity. Although this interaction is also an element in our model, the analysis in this chapter completely differs from Day’s.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Note that the assumption that this is locally the case does not preclude that initially a centrally planned economy may exhibit increasing returns to scale [cf. Day (1982)].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Wit, G. (1993). Nomenklatura, state monopoly, and private enterprise. In: Determinants of Self-employment. Studies in Contemporary Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50300-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50300-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0693-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-50300-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics