Advertisement

Precision Determination of Cyclotron Frequencies of Free Electrons and Ions

  • G. Gräff
Part of the Lecture Notes in Chemistry book series (LNC, volume 31)

Abstract

Within the last two decades the electrodynamical storage of electrons and ions developed into an experimental method of great versatility. That this method is now being used in so many different fields of physics and chemistry results primarily from the long storage times which nowadays can be achieved. Under ultrahigh vacuum conditions and in sufficiently strong electromagnetic fields the particles can easily be trapped for hours or even days. This really long storage time offers the possibility of studying reactions of very slow rate to the chemist and of precision measurement of photon-ion interactions to the physicist. The accuracy of photon-ion interaction measurement is finally limited by Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation. Therefore long interaction times correspond to narrow line widths. An excellent example is the determination of the hyperfine structure of stored Barium ions [1] . The transition frequency is about 10 GHz, the absolute line width achieved in this experiment was a few Hz only. Therefore the fractional line width is of the order of one part in 1010 opening the introduction of this method as a future frequency or time standard. In an analogous fashion electrons were trapped to measure the anomalous part of their magnetic moment to one part in 108 , now the best known elementary particle poperty at all [2]. Last not least atomic masses have been measured to high accuracy.

Keywords

Cyclotron Frequency Drift Tube Magnetic Field Axis Radio Frequency Field Narrow Line Width 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. Becker, R. Blatt and G. Werth, Europhysics Conference Abstracts — ECAP vol. 5a, part 5, p. 208Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. S. van Dyck, Jr., P. B. Swinberg and H. G. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. J. Wineland, P. Ekstrom and H. G. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 (1973) 1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. E. Toscheck and W. Neuhauser, Physikal. Blätter, 36, nr. 7 (1980)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. S. van Dyck, Jr., D. J. Wineland, P. Ekstrom and H. G. Dehmelt, Appl. Phys. Lett. 28 (1976) 446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Graff, H. Kalinowsky and J. Traut, Z. Phys. A 297 (1980) 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Bloch, Physica 19 (1953) 821CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Gräff
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für PhysikUniversität MainzWest Germany

Personalised recommendations