Advertisement

Acoustic Overstimulation Reduces 2f1-f2 Cochlear Emissions at All Levels in the Cat

  • Michael L. Wiederhold
  • Judy W. Mahoney
  • Dean L. Kellogg
Part of the Lecture Notes in Biomathematics book series (LNBM, volume 64)

Abstract

The cubic distortion product, 2f1 — f2 (DP), was recorded in the cat ear canal as the levels of two primary tones (f1=4.0, f2=5.2 kHz here) were varied from approximately 40 to 90dB SPL. The DP level grows as the cube of the primary level at low and high levels, and usually exhibits a dip near L1 = 65dB SPL, DP growth functions and N1 amplitude-level functions were compared before and after exposure to either 4 kHz pure tones or to 500 Hz octave bands of noise. Pure-tone exposure produced a dose-dependent shift in the N1 growth whereas the low-frequency noise exposure produced widely varying shifts in N1 functions. In either case, however, changes in DP were correlated with changes in the neural responses. The level of the DP was compared before and after exposure at 2 levels below and one above the dip at L1 = 65dB SPL. For all of these measures, the decrease in DP level was significantly correlated with the shift in the N1 growth function. At both low and high primary levels, decrease in DP grows approximately as the square of the N1 shift for shifts greater than 15dB.

Keywords

Noise Exposure Basilar Membrane Distortion Product Probe Tube Primary Tone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bohne, B. A., and Clark, W. W., “Growth of Hearing Loss and Cochlear Lesion with Increasing Duration of Noise Exposure.” In New Perspectives in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss, Ed. by R. P. Hamernik, D. Henderson and R. Salvi, Raven Press, New York, pp. 283–302, 1982.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dolan, T. G., and Abbas, P. J., “Changes in the 2f1-f2 Acoustic Emission and Whole-nerve Response following Sound Exposure: Long-term Effects.” J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 77, pp. 1475–1483, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fahey, P. F., and Allen, J. B., “Nonlinear Phenomena as Observed in the Ear Canal and at the Auditory Nerve.” J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 77, PP. 599–612, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schmiedt, R. A. and Adams, J. C., “Stimulated Acoustic Emissions in the Ear Canal of the Gerbil.” Hear. Res. 5, pp. 295–305, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Siegel, J. H., and Kim, D. O., “Cochlear Biomechanics: Vulnerability to Acoustic Trauma and Other Alterations as Seen in Neural Responses and Ear-Canal Sound Pressure.” In New Perspectives in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss, Ed. by R. P. Hamernik, D. Henderson and R. Salvi, Raven Press, New York, pp. 137–151, 1982.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosowski, J. J., Peake, W. T., and White, J. R., “Cochlear Nonline-arities Inferred from Two-Tone Distortion Products in the Ear Canal of the Alligator Lizard”. Hear Res 13, pp. 141–158, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ward, W. D., and Turner, C. W., “The Total Energy Concept as a Unifying Approach to the Prediction of Noise Trauma and its Application to Exposure Criteria.” In New Perspectives in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss, Ed. by R. P. Hamernik, D. Henderson and R. Salvi, Raven Press, New York, pp. 423–435, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zurek, P. M., Clark, W. W., and Kim, D. O., “The Behavior of Acoustic Distortion Products in the Ear Canals of Chinchillas with Normal or Damaged Ears”. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 72, pp 774–780, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael L. Wiederhold
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Judy W. Mahoney
    • 3
  • Dean L. Kellogg
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of OtorhinolaryngologyUniversity of Texas Health Science CenterSan AntonioUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of Texas Health Science CenterSan AntonioUSA
  3. 3.Audie L. Murphy Memorial Veterans’ HospitalSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations