Skip to main content

CT of the postoperative lumbar spine: is contrast enhancement necessary?

  • Conference paper
Proceedings of the XIV Symposium Neuroradiologicum
  • 20 Accesses

Summary

Thirty-eight lumbar disc levels were re-explored following CT in patients with a failed back surgery syndrome. Comparison of the noncontrast CT (NCCT) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) with the operative findings showed that in the majority of cases, NCCT was sufficient for diagnosis. CECT was useful in confirming the extent of epidural fibrosis. A major source of error using both techniques was the presence of undetected disc fragments embedded in scar tissue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Teplick JG, Haskin ME (1983) Computed tomography of the postoperative lumbar spine. AJR 141: 865–884

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schubiger O, Valavanis A (1982) CT differentiation between recurrent disc herniation and postoperative scar formation: the value of contrast enhancement. Neuroradiology 22: 251–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown BM, Bedell JE, Frank E (1986) Contrast enhanced computed tomography scanning of the postoperative spine. Surg Neurol 25: 351–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schell GR, Modesti LM, Cacayorin ED (1986) Diagnostic value of computed tomography in recurrent pain after discectomy. Neurosurgery 20: 302–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dixon AK, Bannon RP (1987) Computed tomography of the postoperative lumbar spine: the need for, and optimal dose of, intravenous contrast medium. Br J Radiol 60: 215–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schubiger O, Valavanis A (1983) Postoperative lumbar CT: technique, results and indications. AJNR 4: 595–597

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Teplick JG, Haskin ME (1984) Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT of the lumbar spine. AJR 143: 845–855

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Braun IF, Hoffmann JC, Davis PC, Landman JA, Tindall GT (1985) Contrast enhancement in CT differentiation between recurrent disc herniation and postoperative scar: prospective study. AJR 145: 785–790

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebeling U, Kalbarcyk H, Reuben HJ (1989) Microsurgical reoperation following lumbar disc surgery. J Neurosurg 70: 397–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

McKinstry, C.S., Bell, K.E. (1991). CT of the postoperative lumbar spine: is contrast enhancement necessary?. In: du Boulay, G., Molyneux, A., Moseley, I. (eds) Proceedings of the XIV Symposium Neuroradiologicum. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-49329-4_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-49329-4_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-49331-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-49329-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics