Abstract
The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ensures a better TNM classification. MRI offers the advantage of multiplanar imaging and high resolution with good soft-tissue differentiation. The aim of the study was to compare planimetry to relaxometry for assessing tumor response to radio-chemotherapy (RCT). The determination of T1-times is proposed as a means for staging, therapeutic planning and monitoring.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bottomley PA, Hardy CJ, Argersinger RE, Mooreb A (1987) A review of H1 NMR relaxation in pathology: are T1 and T2 diagnostic? Med Phys 14: 1–37
Dewes W, Träber F, Gieseke J, Uexküll-Guldenland (1986) Zur Diagnostik von Lymphomen im MRT. ROFO 145: 560–564
Dooms GC, Hriacak H, Moseley M, Fischer M, Higgins C (1985) Characterization of lymphadenopathy by MR relaxation times, preliminary results. Radiology 155: 691–697
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wagner-Manslau, C. et al. (1992). Planimetry Versus Relaxometry as Therapy Monitoring of Head and Neck Tumors. In: Breit, A., Heuck, A., Lukas, P., Kneschaurek, P., Mayr, M. (eds) Tumor Response Monitoring and Treatment Planning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48681-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48681-4_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54783-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-48681-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive