Skip to main content

On Classifier Systems, Disintegrated Representation and Robust Data Mining

  • Conference paper

Abstract

Let x be a boolean vector of predictors and y a scalar response associated with it. Consider the problem of learning the relationship between predictors and response on the basis of a sample of observed pairs (x,y). Various proposed models for automated inference in this case are discussed, and some general dimensions for comparison among them are laid out. These dimensions are inspired by basic characteristics of (inductive) human learning. For example, our ability to receive, encode and modify knowledge in an unlimited number of ways would require a highly flexible representation, while our ability to detect and not be misguided by exceptional phenomena would entail some kind of uncertainty assessment. Systems that emulate such features of human learning may inherit some of its intrinsic robustness.

Classifier systems (CSs) provide a rich framework for general computation and learning, which are intimately related to cognitive and statistical modelling [6,7]. These systems combine low-level building blocks, called classifiers, according to broad plausible heuristics, to form emerging high-level knowledge structures. Knowledge is indeed distributed among classifiers, and these are subject to mild representational constraints. This is an example of disintegrated representation. It is argued that this kind of representation provides a highly flexible approach to automated inference. A new prototype based on a simple CS architecture introduces disintegrated representation in the above data analysis context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A. and Stone, C. J. (1984) Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Forrest, S. (1991) Parallelism and Programming in Classifier Systems. Research Notes in AI, Morgan Kauffman, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldberg, D. E. (1989) Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hawkins, D. M. (1990) Formal Inference-based Recursive Modeling. Technical Report # 542, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hawkins, D. M. and Kass, G. V. (1982) Automatic Interaction Detection. In Topics in Applied Multivariate Analysis (Ed. D. M. Hawkins ). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Holland, J. H. (1986) Escaping brittleness: The possibilities of general-purpose learning algorithms applied to parallel rule-based systems. In Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach II (Eds. R. S. Michalski, J. G. Carbonell and T. M. Mitchell ). Morgan Kauffman, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E. and Thagard, P. R. (1986) Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huber, P. J. (1986) Environments for Supporting Statistical Strategy. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (Ed. W. A. Gale ). Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Langley, P., Zytkow, J. M., Simon, H. A. and Bradshaw, G. L. (1986). The search for regularity: four aspects of scientific discovery. In Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach II (Eds. R. S. Michalski, J. G. Carbonell and T. M. Mitchell ). Morgan Kauffman, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lenat, D. B. (1982) AM: Discovery in Mathematics as Heuristic Search. In Knowledge-based Systems in Artificial Intelligence (Eds. R. Davis and D. B. Lenat ). MacGrawHill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quinlan, R. J. (1986) Induction of Decision Trees. Machine Learning, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Riolo, R. L. (1988) Empirical studies of default hierarchies and sequences of rules in learning classifier systems. Ph. D. Dissertation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rivest, R. L. (1987) Learning Decision Lists. Machine Learning, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schaffer, C. (1989) BACON, Data Analysis and Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Machine Learning (Ed. A. M. Segre ). Morgan Kauffman, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zytkow, J. and Baker, J. (1991) Interactive Mining of Regularities in Databases. In Knowledge Discovery in Databases (Eds. G. Piatetsky-Shapiro and W. J. Frawley ). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Muruzabal, J. (1992). On Classifier Systems, Disintegrated Representation and Robust Data Mining. In: Dodge, Y., Whittaker, J. (eds) Computational Statistics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48678-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48678-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-48680-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-48678-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics