Abstract
Since Adrian in 1926 first established the general principles of afferent nervous activity, there have been numerous studies of the peripheral cutaneous sensory mechanisms. Recent interest has turned on more detailed and quantitative studies of the mechanisms by which the peripheral afferent nerve fibres encode the changing conditions at the surface of the body. There are at present two principle hypotheses to account for the phenomenon. One states that the incoming information is coded in a spatial and temporal pattern of impulses in a population of afferent fibres with nerve-endings which are individually similar, if not identical, but which because of their morphological disposition may respond differently to identical stimuli. This hypothesis has been expressed in several forms by Cauna (1961), Catton (1964) and Weddell and his colleagues (Weddell 1961). The alternative classical hypothesis states that the coding, although depending in part on the temporal pattern of impulses, arises in peripheral receptors that display a considerable degree of dissimilarity, so that the receptors have played a significant part in determining or selecting the afferent fibres that are active in any particular situation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adrian, E. D. (1926). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 61, 49.
Adrian, E. D. (1931). Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 109, 1.
Adrian, E. D. & Zotterman, Y. (1926). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 61, 151.
Bower, E. A. (1959). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 148, 2 P.
Brown, A. G. & Iggo, A. (1963). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 165, 28 P.
Brown, A. G. & Iggo, A. (1964). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 172, 33 P.
Brown, G. L. & Holmes, O. (1956). Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 145, 1.
Catton, W. T. & Pe Toe, N. (1964). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 172, 21 P.
Cauna, N. (1961). In: Cytology of Nervous Tissue, London: Taylor and Francis.
Douglas, W. W., Ritchie, J. M. & Straub, R. W. (1957). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 150, 266.
Fitzgerald, O. (1940). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 98, 163.
Frankenhaeuser, B. (1949). Acta physiol. scand. 18, 68.
Gasser, H. (1955). J. gen. Physiol. 38, 709.
Gray, J. A.B. & Matthews, P. B.C. (1951). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 113, 475.
Hensel, H. & Boman, K. K. A. (1960). J. Neurophysiol. 23, 564.
Hensel, H., Iggo, A. & Witt, Ingrid (1960). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 153, 113.
Hensel, H. & Zotterman, Y. (1951). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 115, 16.
Hunt, C. C. & McIntyre, A. K. (1960 a). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 153, 88.
Hunt, C. C. & McIntyre, A. K. (1960 b). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 153, 99.
Iggo, A. (1958). J. Physiol (Lond.) 142, 110.
Iggo, A. (1959). Quart. J. exp. Physiol. 44, 362.
Iggo, A. (1960). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 152, 337.
Iggo, A. (1963 a). Acta Neuroveg. 24, 175.
Iggo, A. (1963 b). Acta Neuroveg. 24, 225.
Iggo, A. (1964). Nature 204, 481.
Iggo, A. & Mum, A. R. (1963). J. Anat. 97, 151.
Iriuchijima, J. & Zotterman, Y. (1960). Acta physiol. scand. 49, 267.
Lippold, O.C. J., Nicholls, J. G. & Redfearn, J.W.T. (1960). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 153, 218.
Loewenstein, W. R. (1961 a). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 94, 510.
Loewenstein, W. R. (1961 b). J. Neurophysiol. 24, 150.
Pinkus, F. (1904). Arch. mikr. Anat. 65, 121.
Ritchie, J. M. & Straub, R. W. (1956). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 136, 80.
Straile, W.E. (1960). Amer. J. Anat. 106, 133
Weddell, G. (1961). In: Brain and BehaviourI, Washington: Am. Inst. Biol. Sci.
Witt, Ingrid & Hensel, H. (1959). Pflüg. Arch. ges. Physiol. 268, 582.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1965 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Iggo, A. (1965). The Peripheral Mechanisms of Cutaneous Sensation. In: Curtis, D.R., McIntyre, A.K. (eds) Studies in Physiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48612-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48612-8_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-48614-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-48612-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive