Skip to main content

Analysing Ellsberg’s Paradox by Means of Interval-Probability

  • Chapter
Econometrics in Theory and Practice

Summary

The results reported by Ellsberg (1961) are often considered paradoxical. Indeed they reveal behaviour contrasting the sure-thing principle. An analysis employing modern tools produces two insights: 1) The experimental setting of Ellsberg can be adequately described only by means of interval-probability. 2) The validity of the sure-thing principle is restricted to those situations which can sufficiently be described by classical probability. — In addition Ellsberg’s results indicate a typology of behaviour when knowledge is given by interval-probability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Borel, E. (1943). Les Probabilities et la Vie. Universitaires de France. — English translation: ( 1962 ) Probabilities and Life. Dover. New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 75, 643–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Savage, L.J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. Dover. New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schneeweiß, H. (1968). Spieltheoretische Analyse des Ellsberg-Paradoxons. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 124, 249–255

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schneeweiß, H. (1973). The Ellsberg paradox from the point of view of game theory. Inference and Decision. 1, 65–78

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walley, P. (1991). Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman & Hall. London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weichselberger, K. (1995). Axiomatic foundations of the theory of interval-probability. In: Mammitzsch, V.; Schneeweiß, H. (Hg.): Proceedings of the Second Gauß Symposion, Section B. de Gruyter. Berlin; 47–64

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weichselberger, K. (1996). Interval-probability on finite sample-spaces. In: H. Rieder (Hg.): Robust Statistics, Data Analysis and Computer Intensive Methods. In Honor of Peter Huber’s 60th Birthday. Springer. New York; 391–409

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Weichselberger, K. (1998). Elementare Grundbegriffe einer allgemeineren Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Vol.1 forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weichselberger, K., Augustin, T. (1998). Analysing Ellsberg’s Paradox by Means of Interval-Probability. In: Galata, R., Küchenhoff, H. (eds) Econometrics in Theory and Practice. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-47027-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-47027-1_24

  • Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-47029-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-47027-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics