Abstract
CT is a technique with a higher contrast resolution than conventional radiology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akeson P, Larsson EM, Kristofferssen DT, Johnson E, Holtas S (1993) Comparison of contrast enhanced MRI at standard and high dose, using gadodiamide injection in patients with brain metastasis ( Abst) ESMRMB, Rome, p 23
Almen T (1989) Relation between chemical structure, animal toxicity and clinical adverse effects of contrast media. In: Enge I and Edgren J (eds) Patients safety and adverse events in contrast media examination. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, p 25
Brismar JB, et al (1991) Miscellancous adverse effects of low-versus high-osmolality contrast media: a study revised. Radiology 179: 19–23
Buthiau D, Gardeur D (1986) Produits de contraste en tomodensitométrie. In: Protocoles d’examen en tomodensitométrie. Schering, p 4
Costello P, et al (1992) Spiral CT of the thorax with reduced volume of contrast material: a comparative study. Radiology 183: 663–666
Fahlvik AK, Holtz E. Klaveness J (199o) Relaxation efficacy of paramagnetic and superparamagnetic micro-spheres in liver and spleen. Magn Reson Imaging 8: 363–369
Fritzsch T, et al (1992) Status of contrast media research in MRI, ultrasound and X-ray. Eur Radiol 2, 2–13: 1–13
Giovannoni A, Boume MW, Paci E. Terilli F, Pirovano G, Whitehouse GH (1993) The value of GdBOPTA/ dimeg for focal lesions in MRI of the liver ( Abst) SMRMB. Rome, p 104
Grant D, Holtz E, Zech K (1993) Biodistribution and excretion of 54Mn and ~4C labelled MnDPDP in rats and dogs ( Abst) ESMRMB, Rome, p 251
Hasso AN, Kortmann KE, Bradley WG (1988) Supratentorial neoplasms. In: DD Stark and WG Bradley Jr (eds) Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Mosby, St Louis, p 770
Jacobsson BF, et al (1988) Non-ionic versus ionic media in intravenous urography: clinical trial in moo consecutive patients. Radiology 167: 601–605
Katayama H, et al (1990) Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 175: 601–605
Palmer FJ (1988) The RACR survey of intravenous contrast media reactions. Final report. Australas Radiol 32: 426–428
Rémy J (1993) Chest-CT (spiral). 8th European Congress of Radiology, Vienne (Autriche),12–17 Septembre
Rémy-Jardin M, et al (1992) Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single breath-hold technique. Comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology 185: 381–587
Thomsen HS, Dorph S (1993) Review article: Highosmolar and low-osmolar contrast media. An update on frequency of adverse drug reactions. Acta Radiol 34: 205–209
Thornbury JR (1992) Phase III clinical trial of iodixanol (non-ionic, isotonic) as a body CT contrast agent: genitourinary and general results. Am J Roentgenol 158: 1400
Vacek JL, et al (1990) Frequencies of reactions to iohexol versus ioxaglate. Am J Cardiol 66: 1277–1278
Wegener OH (1992) Contrast media. In: Whole body computed tomography, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, p 97
Weissleder R, Papisov M (1992) Pharmaceutical iron oxides for MR Imaging. Rev Magn Reson Med 4: 1–20
Wolf GL (1991) Comparison of the rates of adverse drug reactions–Ionic contrast agents, ionic agents combined with steroids, and non-ionic agents. Invest Radiol 26: 404–410
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lemaignen, H., Bach-Gansmo, T. (1998). Contrast agents. In: Buthiau, D., Khayat, D. (eds) CT and MRI in Oncology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46842-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46842-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-46844-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-46842-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive