Skip to main content

A Framework for Choosing the Most Appropriate Discrete Alternative Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Method in Decision Support Systems and Expert Systems

  • Conference paper
Toward Interactive and Intelligent Decision Support Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 286))

Abstract

In this paper, a conceptual framework is developed for evaluating and comparing discrete alternative multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods available for a given decision situation. The procedure employed in the framework guides the user through an analysis of the decision situation making it possible for a decision maker or analyst to select the most appropriate MCDM method from among several alternative feasible methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brown, R.V. and J.W. Ulvila. Selecting Analytic Approaches for Decision Situations. (Rev ised edition). Vol. 1: An Overview of the Methodology. Technical Report TR 77–7–25. Decisions and Designs, Inc., McLean, Virginia, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currim, I.S. and R.S. Sarin. “A Comparative Evaluation of Multiattribute Consumer Preference Methods”. Management Science, 30, May, 1984, pp. 543–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despontin, M., J. Moscarola, and J. Spronk. A User-Oriented Listing of Multiple Criteria Decision Methods. Revue Belge de Statistique, d’Informatique et de Recherche Operationnelle, 23/4, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. and R.K. Sarin. “Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions”, Operations Research, 27, July — August 1979, pp. 810–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, A. “One-of-a-Kind Decisions Involving Weighted Multiple Objectives and Disparate Alternatives.” In J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, The University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina, 1973, pp. 657–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H.J. and W. McCoach. “A Simple Multiattribute Utility Procedure for Evaluation”, Behavioral Science, 22, No. 4, 1977, pp. 270–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G.W. “An Overview of Techniques for Solving Multiobjective Mathematical Problems”, Management Science, 30, November 1984, pp. 1268–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C.K., R.L. Keeney and C.W. Kirkwood. “Evaluating Methodologies: A Procedure and Application to Nuclear Power Plant Siting Methodologies”, Management Science, 25, January 1979, pp. 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, B.F. Analytical Multiobjective Decision Methods for Power Plant Siting; A Review of Theory and Applications, BNL- NUREG-5120 4, NUREG/CR-1687, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, B.F. Experiments in Multicriteria Decision Making and What We Can Learn from Them: An Example. In Y.Y. Haimes and V. Chankong (Eds.), Decision Making with Multiple Objectives, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 1985, pp. 400–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, C.L. and K. Yoon. Multiple Attribute Decision Making — Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L. and H. Raiffa. Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Wiley, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneppreth, N.P., W. Hoessel, D. H. Gustafson, and E.M. Johnson. A Strategy for Selecting a Worth Assessment Technique. Technical Paper 280. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Alexandria, Virginia, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koksalan, M., M. Karwan, and S. Zionts. An Approach for Solving Discrete Alternative Multiple Criteria Problems Involving Ordinal Criteria. Working Paper No. 571. State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon, K.R. An Overview of Multiple Criteria Decision Making. In J. L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, The University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina, 1973, pp. 18–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozernoy, V.M. “Feedbacks in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis”. In L. Sjoberg, T. Tyszka, and J.A. Wise (Eds.), Human Decision Making, Doxa, Sweden, 1983, pp. 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. and P. Vincke. “Multicriteria Analysis: Survey and New Directions”. European Journal of Operational Research, 8, 1981, pp. 207–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. and D. Bonyssou. “An Example of Comparison of Two Decision-Aid Models”. In G. Fandel and J. Spronk (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Methods and Applications, Springer-Ver1ag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 1985, pp. 361–381.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. The Analytic Hierarchy Process; Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. “A Method of Multiattribute Decision Making with Incomplete Information”, Management Science, 31, November 1985, pp. 1365–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zionts, S. Multiple Criteria Mathematical Programming: An Overview and Several Approaches. In G. Fandel and J. Spronk (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Methods and Applivations, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 1985, pp. 85–128.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ozernoy, V.M. (1987). A Framework for Choosing the Most Appropriate Discrete Alternative Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Method in Decision Support Systems and Expert Systems. In: Sawaragi, Y., Inoue, K., Nakayama, H. (eds) Toward Interactive and Intelligent Decision Support Systems. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 286. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46609-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46609-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-17719-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-46609-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics