Abstract
The purpose of this research was to develop a multicriteria decision making tool which could take into account the cognitive limitations of human information processing. Specifically, an interactive goal programming methodology was devised which sought to minimize the difficulty of prioritizing goals and of restructuring problems to find improved solutions. This methodology employs a priority elicitation procedure which can accept a variety of ill to well-defined priority structures. It provides feedback after each solution is generated. This feedback describes the tradeoff inherent in improving the achievement of any unsatisfied goals. Goal attainment probabilities and possible goal level revisions are also presented to users of the model to assist them in evaluating alternative restructures of the model. These modifications have been incorporated into a generalizable decision support system which has been tested in an academic decision making environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Benayoun, R., de Montgolfier, J., Tergny, J. and Lartchev, O. Linear programming with multiple objective functions. Mathematical Programming, 1971, 1(3), 366–375
Carlson, E.D. Grace B.F. Sutton, J.A. Case Studies of end users requirements for interactive problem-solving. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 1977; 1(1), pp. 51–63.
DeWaele, M. Managerial style and the design of decision aids. Omega, 1978, 6(1), 5–13.
Franz, L.S. Elicitation of decision maker preference structure for multicriteria optimization through interactive goal programming. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 1980.
Franz, L.S. Lee, S.M. and Van Horn, J.C. An Adaptive DSS for Academic Resource Planning. Unpublished paper, University of South Carolina, 1980.
Gardner, J. “The use of the term ‘Level of Aspiration’.” in C.L. Stacey and M.F. Martino (Eds.), Understanding human motivation. Howard Allen, 1958.
Geoffrion, A.M., Dyer, J.S., and Feinberg, A. An interactive approach for multicriterion optimization with an application to the operation of an academic department. Management Science, 1972, 19(4), 357–368.
Johnson, E. Experiences in multiobjective management processes. In M. Zeleny (Ed.), multiple criteria decision making; Kyoto 1975. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976, 135–152.
Keen, Peter G.W., The evolving concept of optimality in: M.K. Starr and M. Zeleny, (Eds.). TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 1977, 6, 31–57.
Lee, S. M. Goal Programming for Decision Analaysis. Philadelphia: Auerback Publishers, 1972.
Miller, G.A. The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for information processing. Psychological Review, 1956, 63(2), 81–97.
Starr, M.K., and Zeleny, M. MCDM-State and future of the arts. In M.K. Starr and M. Zeleny (Eds.), TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, (1977), 6, 5–29.
Wertheimer, M. Fundamental issues in psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. 1972.
Wilsted, W.D., Hendrick, T.E., and Stewart, T.R. Judgement policy capturing for bank loan decisions: An approach to developing objective functions for goal programming models. Journal of Management Studies, 1975, 12(2), 210–215.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Franz, L.S., Lee, S.M. (1981). A Goal Programming Based Interactive Decision Support System. In: Morse, J.N. (eds) Organizations: Multiple Agents with Multiple Criteria. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 190. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45527-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45527-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-10821-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45527-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive