Skip to main content

Probability Dominance in Random Outcomes

— An Introduction

  • Conference paper
Organizations: Multiple Agents with Multiple Criteria

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 190))

  • 105 Accesses

Abstract

In making decisions under uncertainty the following rationale or justification is often heard: “A is chosen because A is likely to outperform B” or “A is chosen because A’s prospect is likely to be better than B’s.” The argument based on this rationale or justification is simple and can be effective. The rationale may be a habitual one in many people’s information processing when making a decision. Unfortunately, the rationale may be too simple to be directly analyzed by more elaborate concepts such as utility functions (for instance see Fishburn (Ref. 1), stochastic dominance (for instance see Brumelle and Vickson (Ref. 2), Fishburn (Refs. 3,4), Hanoch and Levy (Ref. 5)), mean-variance (and the third moment) dominance (Markowitz (Refo. 6)), chance constrained programming (for instance, Charnes and Cooper (Ref. 7)), maximizing the probability of achieving an aspiration level or minimizing the probability of insolvency etc.

The entire article will appear in the Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications. Interested readers please contact P. L. Yu for a copy of the article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fishburn, P. C., Utility Theory for Decision Making, John Wiley and Sons, Hew York, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brumelle, S. L. and Vickson, R. G., A Unified Approach to Stochasitic Dominance, Stochastic Optimization Models in Finance, Edited by W. T. Ziemba and R. G. Vickson, Academic Press, New York, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fishburn, P. C., Stochastic Dominance without Transitive Preferences, Management Science, Vol. 24, pp. 1268–1277, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fishburn, P. G., Stochastic Dominance: Theory and Application, The Role and Effectiveness of Theories of Decision in Practice, Edited by D. J. White and K. C. Bowen, Hodder and Stoughton, London, England, pp. 60-72, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hanoch, G. and Levy, H. The Efficiency Analysis of Choices Involving Risk, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 36 pp. 335–346, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Markowitz, H. M., Portfolio Selection, Journal of Finance, Vol. 6, pp. 77–91, 1952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. Chance-Constrained Programming, Management Science, Vol. 6, pp. 73–79, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Simon, H. A., Administrative behavior, Macmillan, New York, New York, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yu, P. L., Behavior Bases and Habitual Domains of Human Decision/Behavior-Concepts and Applications, Proceedings of the Third Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making—Theory and Application, Edited by G. Fandel and T. Gal, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pitman, E. J. G., The Closest Estimates of Statistical Parameters, Proceedings of the Cambridge Phil. Society, Vol. 33, pp. 212–222, 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Savage, L. J., The Foundations of Statistics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wrather, C., A Model of the General Bargaining Interaction with Application to Buyer/Seller Bargaining, Ph.D. Dissertation, Graduate School of Business, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Libby, R. and Fishburn, P. C. Behavioral Models of Risk Taking in Business Decision: A Survey and Evaluation, Journal of Accounting Research, pp. 272-292, Autumn 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blyth, C., R., Some Probability Paradoxes in Choice from among Random Alternatives, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 67, pp. 366–373, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wrather, C., Yu, P.L. (1981). Probability Dominance in Random Outcomes. In: Morse, J.N. (eds) Organizations: Multiple Agents with Multiple Criteria. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 190. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45527-8_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45527-8_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-10821-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45527-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics