Abstract
In making decisions under uncertainty the following rationale or justification is often heard: “A is chosen because A is likely to outperform B” or “A is chosen because A’s prospect is likely to be better than B’s.” The argument based on this rationale or justification is simple and can be effective. The rationale may be a habitual one in many people’s information processing when making a decision. Unfortunately, the rationale may be too simple to be directly analyzed by more elaborate concepts such as utility functions (for instance see Fishburn (Ref. 1), stochastic dominance (for instance see Brumelle and Vickson (Ref. 2), Fishburn (Refs. 3,4), Hanoch and Levy (Ref. 5)), mean-variance (and the third moment) dominance (Markowitz (Refo. 6)), chance constrained programming (for instance, Charnes and Cooper (Ref. 7)), maximizing the probability of achieving an aspiration level or minimizing the probability of insolvency etc.
The entire article will appear in the Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications. Interested readers please contact P. L. Yu for a copy of the article.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Fishburn, P. C., Utility Theory for Decision Making, John Wiley and Sons, Hew York, New York, 1970.
Brumelle, S. L. and Vickson, R. G., A Unified Approach to Stochasitic Dominance, Stochastic Optimization Models in Finance, Edited by W. T. Ziemba and R. G. Vickson, Academic Press, New York, New York, 1975.
Fishburn, P. C., Stochastic Dominance without Transitive Preferences, Management Science, Vol. 24, pp. 1268–1277, 1978.
Fishburn, P. G., Stochastic Dominance: Theory and Application, The Role and Effectiveness of Theories of Decision in Practice, Edited by D. J. White and K. C. Bowen, Hodder and Stoughton, London, England, pp. 60-72, 1975.
Hanoch, G. and Levy, H. The Efficiency Analysis of Choices Involving Risk, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 36 pp. 335–346, 1969.
Markowitz, H. M., Portfolio Selection, Journal of Finance, Vol. 6, pp. 77–91, 1952.
Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. Chance-Constrained Programming, Management Science, Vol. 6, pp. 73–79, 1969.
Simon, H. A., Administrative behavior, Macmillan, New York, New York, 1947.
Yu, P. L., Behavior Bases and Habitual Domains of Human Decision/Behavior-Concepts and Applications, Proceedings of the Third Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making—Theory and Application, Edited by G. Fandel and T. Gal, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, 1980.
Pitman, E. J. G., The Closest Estimates of Statistical Parameters, Proceedings of the Cambridge Phil. Society, Vol. 33, pp. 212–222, 1937.
Savage, L. J., The Foundations of Statistics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1954.
Wrather, C., A Model of the General Bargaining Interaction with Application to Buyer/Seller Bargaining, Ph.D. Dissertation, Graduate School of Business, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 1980.
Libby, R. and Fishburn, P. C. Behavioral Models of Risk Taking in Business Decision: A Survey and Evaluation, Journal of Accounting Research, pp. 272-292, Autumn 1977.
Blyth, C., R., Some Probability Paradoxes in Choice from among Random Alternatives, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 67, pp. 366–373, 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wrather, C., Yu, P.L. (1981). Probability Dominance in Random Outcomes. In: Morse, J.N. (eds) Organizations: Multiple Agents with Multiple Criteria. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 190. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45527-8_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45527-8_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-10821-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45527-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive