Advertisement

Venoms and Venom Apparatuses of the Formicidae: Myrmeciinae, Ponerinae, Dorylinae, Pseudomyrmecinae, Myrmicinae, and Formicinae

  • M. S. Blum
  • H. R. Hermann
Part of the Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology / Handbuch der experimentellen Pharmakologie book series (HEP, volume 48)

Abstract

Ants, in the majority of subfamilies, are capable of stinging; in many cases, the reactions of human beings to such stings are severe enough to require immediate medical treatment. Because of their virtual ubiquity, ants constitute arthropods of considerable medical importance, although their role in inflicting stings is often unrecognized because of their relative inconspicuousness vis-à-vis flying hymenopterans such as bees and wasps. In all probability the venom arsenals of ants are highly varied but in addition, these insects also possess other exocrine glands which can be discharged during defensive encounters.

Keywords

Mandibular Gland Alarm Pheromone Venom Gland Venom Component Metapleural Gland 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adrouny, G.A., Derbes, V.J., Jung, R.C.: Isolation of a hemolytic component of fire ant venom. Science 130, 449 (1959).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous: Insect sting allergy, Questionaire study of 2606 cases. J.A.M.A. 193, 115 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayre, G.L., Blum, M.S.: Attraction and alarm of ants (Camponotus spp.-Hymenoptera: Formicidae) by pheromones. Physiol. Zool. 44, 11–83 (1971).Google Scholar
  4. Barnard, J.H.: Allergic and pathologic findings in fifty insect sting fatalities. J. Allergy 40, 107 (1967).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barr, S.E.: Skin test reactivity to the stinging insects. Ann. Allergy 30, 282 (1972).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Beard, R.L.: Arthropod venoms as insecticides. In: Naturally Occurring Insecticides. Jacobson, M., Crosby, D.G. (eds.). New York: Marcel Dekker, 1971.Google Scholar
  7. Benthuysen, J.L., Blum, M.S.: Quantitative sensitivity of the ant Pogonomyrmex barbatus to the enantiomers of its alarm pheromone. J. Georgia Ent. Soc. 9, 235–238 (1974).Google Scholar
  8. Bequaert, J.C.: Medical report of the Hamilton Rice Seventh Expedition to the Amazon, in conjuction with the Department of Tropical Medicine of Harvard University, 1924-25. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1926, pp. 250–253.Google Scholar
  9. Bergström, G., Löfqvist, J.: Odour similarities between the slave-keeping ants Formica sanguinea and Polyergus rufescens and their slaves Formica fusca and Formica rufibarbis. J. Insect Physiol. 14, 995–1011 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergström, G., Löfqvist, J.: Chemical basis for odour communication in four species of Lasius ants. J. Insect Physiol. 16, 2353–2375 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergström, G., Löfqvist, J.: Camponotus ligniperda Latr.-a model for the composite volatile secretions of Dufour’s gland in formicine ants. In: Chemical Releasers in Insects (Tahori, A.S., ed.) New York: Gordon and Breach, 1971, Vol. III, pp. 195-223.Google Scholar
  12. Bergström, G., Löfqvist, J.: Similarities between the Dufour’s gland secretions of the ants Camponotus ligniperda (Latr.) and Camponotus herculeanus (L.). Ent. Scand. 3, 225–238 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bergström, G., Löfqvist, J.: Chemical congruence of the complex odoriferous secretions from Dufour’s gland in three species of ants of the genus Formica. J. Insect Physiol. 19, 887–907 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernardi, R., Cardani, C., Ghiringhella, D., Selva, A., Baggini, A., Pavan, M.: On the components of secretion of mandibular glands of the ant Lasius (Dendrolasius) fuliginosus. Tetrahedron Lett. 40, 3893–3896 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Betts, A.D.: Pratical Bee Anatomy. Benson, England: The Apis Club, 1923, 88 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Bevan, C.W.L., Birch, A.J., Caswell, H.: An insect repellent from black cocktail ants. J. Chem. Soc. 1961, 488 (1961).Google Scholar
  17. Beyer, O.W.: Der Giftapparat von Formica rufa, ein reduziertes Organ. Jena’sche Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaft 25, 26–112 (1891).Google Scholar
  18. Blum, M.S.: The source and specificity of trail pheromones in Termitopone, Monomorium and Huberia, and their relation to those of some other ants. Proc. Roy. Ent. Soc. London Ser. A 41, 155–160 (1966).Google Scholar
  19. Blum, M.S., Brand, J.M., Amante, E.: Unpublished data (1974a).Google Scholar
  20. Blum, M.S., Brand, J.M., Duffield, R.M., Snelling, R.R.: Chemistry of the venom of Solenopsis aurea (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 66, 702 (1973).Google Scholar
  21. Blum, M.S., Brand, J.M., Watkins, J.F.: Unpublished data (1974b).Google Scholar
  22. Blum, M.S., Callahan, P.S.: The venom and poison glands of Pseudomyrmex pallidus (F. Smith). Psyche 70, 69–74 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Blum, M.S., Crewe, R.M., Sudd, J.H., Garrison, A.W.: 2-Hexenal: Isolation and function in a Crematogaster (Atopogyne) sp. J. Georgia Ent. Soc. 4, 145–148 (1969a).Google Scholar
  24. Blum, M.S., Hermann, H.R.: The hymenopterous poison gland: Probable functions of the main glandibular elements. J. Georgia Ent. Soc. 4, 23–28 (1969).Google Scholar
  25. Blum, M.S., Padovani, R., Amante, E.: Alkanones and terpenes in the mandibular glands of Atta species. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 26, 291–299 (1968a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Blum, M.S., Padovani, F., Curley, A., Hawk, R.E.: Benzaldehyde: Defensive secretion of a harvester ant. Comp. Biochem, Physiol. 29, 461–465 (1969b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Blum, M.S., Padovani, F., Hermann, H.R., Kannowski, P.B.: Chemical releasers of social behavior. XI. Terpenes in the mandibular glands of Lasius umbratus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Formicinae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 61, 1354–1359 (1968b).Google Scholar
  28. Blum, M.S., Walker, J.R., Callahan, P.S., Novak, A.F.: Chemical, insecticidal and antibiotic properties of fire ant venom. Science 128, 306–307 (1958).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Blum, M.S., Watkins, J.F.: Gehlbach, F.R., Kroll, J.C). Ecology 50, 1098–1102 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Blum, M.S., Wheeler, J.W.: Unpublished data (1974).Google Scholar
  31. Bordas, M.L.: Appareil glandulaire des Hymenopteres. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. Paleon. 19, 1–363 (1895).Google Scholar
  32. Bowen, R.B.: Insects and allergic problems. South Med. J. 44, 836 (1951).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Brand, J.M., Blum, M.S., Barlin, M.R.: Fire ant venoms: Intraspecific and interspecific variation among castes and individuals. Toxicon 11, 325–331 (1973a).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Brand, J.M., Blum, M.S., Fales, H.M., MacConnell, J.G.: Fire ant venoms: comparative analyses of alkaloidal components. Toxicon 10, 259–271 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Brand, J.M., Blum, M.S., Lloyd, H.A., Fletcher, D.J.C.: Monoterpene hydrocarbons in the poison gland secretion of the ant Myrmicaria natalensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 67, 525–526 (1974).Google Scholar
  36. Brand, J.M., Blum, M.S., Ross, H.H.: Biochemical evolution in fire ant venoms. Insect Biochem. 3, 45–51 (1967b).Google Scholar
  37. Brand, J.M., Duffield, R.M., MacConnell, J.G., Blum, M.S. Fales, H.M.: Caste-specific compounds in male carpenter ants. Science 179, 388–389 (1973c).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Brand, J.M., Fales, H.M., Sokoloski, E.A., MacConnell, J.G., Blum, M.S., Duffield, R.M.: Identification of mellein in the mandibular gland secretion of carpenter ants. Life Sci. 13, 201–211 (1973d).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Brophy, J.J., Cavill, G.W.K., Shannon, J.S.: Venom and Dufour’s gland secretions in an Australian species of Camponotus. J. Insect Physiol. 19, 791–798 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Brown, W.L., Jr.: Remarks on the internal phylogeny and subfamily classification of the family Formicidae. Insectes Soc. 1, 21–31 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Brown, W.L., Jr.: An hypothesis concerning the function of the metapleural glands in ants. Amer. Natur. 102, 188–191 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Brown, W.L., Jr., Nutting, W.L.: Wing venation and the phylogeny of the Formicidae (Hymenoptera). Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. 75, 113–132 (1950).Google Scholar
  43. Buren, W.F.: A review of the species of Crematogaster, sensu stricto, in North America (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Part I. J.N.Y. Ent. Soc. 66, 118–134 (1958).Google Scholar
  44. Buren, W.F., Hermann, H.R., Blum, M.S.: The widespread occurence of mandibular grooves in aculeate Hymenoptera. J. Georgia Ent. Soc. 5, 185–196 (1970).Google Scholar
  45. Butenandt, A., Linzen, B., Lindauer, M.: Über einen Duftstoff aus der Mandibeldrüse der Blattschneiderameise Atta sexdens rubropilosa Forel. Arch. Anat. Microscop. Morph. Exptl. 48, 13–19 (1959).Google Scholar
  46. Callahan, P.S., Blum, M.S., Walker, J.R.: Morphology and histology of the poison glands and sting of the imported fire ant (Solenopsis saevisima v. richteri Forel). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 52, 573–590 (1959).Google Scholar
  47. Caro, M.R., Derbes, V.J., Jung, R.: Skin responses to the sting of the imported fire ant (Solenopsis saevissima). A.M.A. Arch. Dermatol. 75, 475–488 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Casnati, G., Ricca, A., Pavan, M.: Sulla secrezione difensiva delle glandole mandibolari Paltothyreus tarsatus (Fabr.). Chimica Ind. (Milano) 49, 57–61 (1967).Google Scholar
  49. Castellani, A.A., Gabba, A., Laterza, L., Pavan, M.: Sulla biogenesi dell’acido formico in Formica lugubris Zett. Memorie Soc. Ent. Ital. 48, 147–152 (1969).Google Scholar
  50. Cavill, G.W.K., Clark, D.V., Whitfield, F.B.: Insect venoms, attractants, and repellents. XI. Massoilactone from two species of formicine ants, and some observations on constituents of the bark oil of Cryptocarya massoia. Aust. J. Chem. 21, 2819–2823 (1968).Google Scholar
  51. Cavill, G.W.K., Robertson, P.L., Whitfield, F.B.: Venom and venom apparatus of the bull ant, Myrmecia gulosa (Fabr.). Science 146, 79–80 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Cavill, G.W.K., Williams, P.J.: Constituents of Dufour’s gland in Myrmecia gulosa. J. Insect Physiol. 13, 1097–1103 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Cavill, G.W.K., Williams, P.J., Whitfield, F.B.: α-Farnesene, Dufour’s gland secretion in the ant Aphaenogaster longiceps (F. Sm.). Tetrahedron Lett. 23, 2201–2205 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Chadha, M.S., Eisner, T., Monro, A., Meinwald, J.: Defense mechanisms of arthropods. VII. Citronellal and citral in the mandibular gland secretions of the ant Acanthomyops claviger (Roger). J. Insect Physiol. 8, 175–179 (1962).Google Scholar
  55. Chrystal, R.N.: The Sirex wood-wasps and their importance in forestry. Bull. Ent. Res. 19, 219–247 (1928).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Clark, J.: The Formicidae of Australia. Subfamily Myrmeciinae. Melbourne, Australia: Commonwealth Sci. Ind. Res. Org., 1951, Vol. I.Google Scholar
  57. Clausen, C.P.: Entomophagous Insects. New York: McGraw Hill, 1940.Google Scholar
  58. Cooper, K.W.: Egg gigantism, oviposition, and genital anatomy: Their bearing on the biology and phylogenetic position of Orussus (Hymenoptera: Siricoidea). Proc Rochester Acad. Sci. 10, 39–68 (1953).Google Scholar
  59. Copland, M.J.W., King, P.E.: The structure of the female reproductive system in the Chalcididae (Hym.). Ent. Monthly. 107, 230–239 (1971).Google Scholar
  60. Creighton, W.S.: The ants of North America. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 104, 1–585 (1950).Google Scholar
  61. Creighton, W.S.: Studies on Arizona ants. 1. The habits of Camponotus ulcerosus Wheeler and its identity with C. bruesi Wheeler, Psyche 58, 47–64 (1952).Google Scholar
  62. Creighton, W.S.: New data on the habits of the ants of the genus Veromessor. Amer. Mus. Novitates. 1612, 1–18 (1953).Google Scholar
  63. Creighton, W.S., Snelling, R.R.: The rediscovery of Camponotus (Myrmaphaenus) yogi. (Wheeler) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 73, 187–195 (1966).Google Scholar
  64. Crewe, R.M., Blum, M.S.: Identification of the alarm pheromones of the ant Myrmica brevinodis. J. Insect Physiol. 16, 141–146 (1970a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Crewe, R.M., Blum, M.S.: Alarm pheromones in the genus Myrmica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Their composition and species specificity. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 70, 363–373 (1970b).Google Scholar
  66. Crewe, R.M., Blum, M.S.: Alarm pheromones of the Attini: Their phylogenetic significance. J. Insect Physiol. 18, 31–42 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Crewe, R.M., Blum, M.S., Collingwood, C.A.: Comparative analysis of alarm pheromones in the ant genus Crematogaster. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 43b, 703–716 (1972).Google Scholar
  68. Crewe, R.M., Brand, J.M., Fletcher, D.J.C.: Identification of an alarm pheromone in the ant Crematogaster peringueyi. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 62, 1212 (1969).Google Scholar
  69. Crewe, R.M., Brand, J.M., Fletcher, D.J.C, Eggers, S.H.: The mandibular gland chemistry of some South African species of Crematogaster (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Georgia Ent. Soc. 5, 42–47 (1970).Google Scholar
  70. Crewe, R.M., Fletcher, D.J.C.: Ponerine ant secretions: The mandibular gland secretion of Paltothyreus tarsatus Fabr. J. Ent. Soc. South Africa 37, 291–298 (1974).Google Scholar
  71. Daly, H.V.: A comparative survey of the sting of aculeate Hymenoptera. Thesis, Univ. Kansas, USA, 67 pp. (1953).Google Scholar
  72. Darwin, C.: On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: Murray, 1859.Google Scholar
  73. Davis, N.T.: Morphology of the female organs of reproduction in the Miridae (Hemiptera). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 48, 132–150 (1955).Google Scholar
  74. Deleurance, E.P.: Les Eumenes de la région nicoise. Essai de monographie biologique. Bull. Soc. Zool. France. 70, 85–100 (1946).Google Scholar
  75. Derwitz, H.: Über Bau und Entwicklung des Stachels der Ameisen. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool. 28, 527–556 (1878).Google Scholar
  76. D’Rozario, A.M.: On the development and homologies of the genitalia and their ducts in Hymenoptera. Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 92, 362–415 (1942).Google Scholar
  77. Duffield, R.M., Blum, M.S.: 4-Methyl-3-heptanone: Indentification and function in Neoponera villosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 66, 1357 (1973).Google Scholar
  78. Duffield, R.M., Blum, M.S.: Unpublished data (1974).Google Scholar
  79. Eisner, T., Brown, W.L., Jr.: The evolution and social significance of the ant proventriculus. Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Ent. (Montreal, 1956) 2, 503–508 (1958).Google Scholar
  80. Emery, C.: Notes sur les sous-familles des Dorylines et Ponérines. (Famille des Formicides). Ann. Soc. Belg. 45, 32–54 (1901).Google Scholar
  81. Evans, H.E.: The comparative ethology and evolution of the sand wasps. Comstock Publ. Assoc. Cambridge, Mass. I-XVI. 526 pp. (1966).Google Scholar
  82. Evans, H.E., Eberhard, M.J.W.: The Wasps. Ann. Arbor: Univ. Michigan Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  83. Fales, H.M., Blum, M.S., Crewe, R.M., Brand, J.M.: Alarm pheromones in the genus Manica derived from the mandibular gland. J. Insect Physiol. 18, 1077–1088 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Fales, H.M., Pedder, D., Blum, M.S., Crewe, R.M., MacConnell, J.G.: Unpublished data (1974).Google Scholar
  85. Flemming, H.: Die Muskulatur und Innervierung des Wehrstachelapparates von Aculeaten. Z. Morphol. Oekol. Tiere 46, 321–341 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Foerster, R.: Vergleichendanatomische Untersuchungen über den Stechapparat der Ameisen. Zool. Jahrb. (Sect. 2) Abt. Anat. Ontog. Tiere. 34, 347–380 (1912).Google Scholar
  87. Forbes, J.: Anatomy and histology of the worker Camponotus herculeanus pennsylvanicus De Geer (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 31, 181–195 (1938).Google Scholar
  88. Forel, A.: Der Giftapparat und die Analdrüsen der Ameisen. Z. Wiss. Zool. 3, 28–68 (1878).Google Scholar
  89. Forel, A.: Der Giftapparat und die Analdrüsen der Ameisen. Z. Wiss. Zool. 30, 28–66 (1887).Google Scholar
  90. Ghent, R.L.: Adaptive refinements in the chemical defense mechanisms of certain Formicinae. Doctoral Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York (1961).Google Scholar
  91. Ghent, R.L., Gary, N.E.: A chemical alarm releaser in honey bee stings (Apis mellifera L.). Psyche 69, 1–6 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Gösswald, K.: Histologische Untersuchungen an der arbeiterlosen Ameise Teleutomyrmex schneiden Kutter (Hym. Formicidae). Mitteilungen Schweiz. Ent. Ges. 26, 81–126 (1953).Google Scholar
  93. Gotwald, W.H., Jr.: Mouthpart morphology of the ant Aneuretus simoni. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 63, 950–952 (1970).Google Scholar
  94. Gotwald, W.H., Jr., Brown, W.L., Jr.: The ant genus Simopelta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 73, 261–277 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Grünanger, P.A., Quilico, A., Pavan, M.: Sul secreto del formicide Myrmicaria natalensis Fred. Accad. Nazion. Lincei 28, 293–300 (1960).Google Scholar
  96. Gupta, P.D.: On the structure, development and homology of the female reproductive organs in Orthopteroid insects. Indian J. Ent. 10, 75–123 (1950).Google Scholar
  97. Gustafson, J.F.: The origin and evolution of the genitalia of the Insecta. Microent. 15, 35–67 (1950).Google Scholar
  98. Happ, G.M., Meinwald, J.: Biosynthesis of arthropod secretions. I. Monoterpene synthesis in an ant (Acanthomyops claviger). J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 87, 2507–2508 (1965).Google Scholar
  99. Haupt, H.: Alte und neue Pepsis-arten (Sphecoidea) Pompilidae, olim Psammocharidae auct. mit einem Anhang: Der Stachelapparat der spinnenfangenden Raubwespen. Nova Acta Leopoldina, N.S. 15, 109, 309–414 (1952).Google Scholar
  100. Hermann, H.R.: The hymenopterous poison apparatus. IV. Dasymutilla occidentalis (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae). J. Georgia Ent. Soc. 3, 1–10 (1968a).Google Scholar
  101. Hermann, H.R.: The hymenopterous poison apparatus. V. Aneuretus simoni. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 61, 1315–1317 (1968b).Google Scholar
  102. Hermann, H.R.: The hymenopterous poison apparatus. VII. Simopelta oculata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae). J. Georgia Ent. Soc. 3, 163–166 (1968c).Google Scholar
  103. Hermann, H.R.: The hymenopterous poison apparatus: Evolutionary trends in three closely related subfamilies of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Georgia Ent. Soc. 4, 123–141 (1969a).Google Scholar
  104. Hermann, H.R.: The hymenopterous poison apparatus. VIII. Leptogenys (Lobopelta) elongata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Georgia Ent. Soc. 42, 239–243 (1969b).Google Scholar
  105. Hermann, H.R.: Sting autonomy, a defensive mechanism in certain social Hymenoptera. Insectes Soc. 18, 111–120 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Hermann, H.R.: Crepuscular and nocturnal activities of Paraponera clavata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae). Ent. News 86, 94–98 (1975).Google Scholar
  107. Hermann, H.R.: The hymenopterous venom apparatus-Morphology and evolution. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. (in press) (1978a).Google Scholar
  108. Hermann, H.R.: The furcula, a major component in the formicid venom apparatus. Inter. J. Insect Morph. and Embryol. (in press) (1977).Google Scholar
  109. Hermann, H.R.: Muscles of the sting base in hymenopterous insects. Inter. J. Insect Morph. and Embryol. (in press) (1978b).Google Scholar
  110. Hermann, H.R., Baer, R., Bariin, M.: Histology and function of the venom gland system in formicine ants. Psyche 82, 67–73 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Hermann, H.R., Blum, M.S.: The morphology and histology of the hymenopterous poison apparatus. I. Paraponera clavata (Formicidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 59, 397–409 (1966).Google Scholar
  112. Hermann, H.R., Blum, M.S.: The morphology and histology of the hymenopterous poison apparatus. II. Pogonomyrmex badius (Formicidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 60, 661–665 (1967a).Google Scholar
  113. Hermann, H.R., Blum, M.S.: The morphology and histology of the hymenopterous poison apparatus. III. Eciton hamatum (Formicidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 60, 1282–1291 (1967b).Google Scholar
  114. Hermann, H.R., Blum, M.S.: The hymenopterous poison apparatus. VI. Camponotus pennsylvanicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 75, 216–227 (1968).Google Scholar
  115. Hermann, H.R., Hamilton, W.D.: Sting anatomy and autotomy in tropical polistine wasps (In preparation) (1975).Google Scholar
  116. Hermann, H.R., Hunt, A.N., Buren, W.F.: Mandibular gland and mandibular groove in Polistes annularis (L.) and Vespula maculata (L.) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Int. J. Insect Morph. Embryol. 1, 43–49 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Hermann, H.R., Moser, J.C., Hunt, A.N.: The hymenopterous poison apparatus. XI. Morphological and behavioral changes in Atta texana (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 63, 1552–1558 (1970).Google Scholar
  118. Hermann, H.R., Mullen, M.A.: The hymenopterous poison apparatus. XI. Xylocopa virginica (Hymenoptera: Xylocopidae). J. Georgia Ent. Soc. 9, 246–252 (1974).Google Scholar
  119. Hölldobler, B., Maschwitz, V.: Der Hochzeitsschwarm der Roßameise Componotus herculeanus (Hym. Formicidae). Z. Vergl. Physiol. 50, 551–568 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Hung, A.C.F., Brown, W.L.: Structure of gastric apex as a subfamily character of the Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J.N.Y. Ent. Soc. 74, 198–200 (1964).Google Scholar
  121. Hunt, A.N., Hermann, H.R.: Insect envenomization: Some hematological reactions in guinea pigs to three hymenopterous venoms. J. Georgia Ent. Soc. 8, 249–264 (1973).Google Scholar
  122. Janet, C.: Études sur les fourmis, les guêpes et les abeilles. Note 18. Aiguillon de la Myrmica rubra. Appareil de fermeture de la glande à venin. Georges Carré et C. Naud, éditeurs, Paris 11, 393–449 (1898).Google Scholar
  123. Janvier, H.: Paralysie des pucerons par constriction thoracique. C.R. Acad. Sci. 241, 608–609 (1955).Google Scholar
  124. Jouvanez, D.P., Blum, M.S., MacConnell, J.G.: Antibacterial activity of venom alkaloids from the imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren. Antimicrob. Ag. Chemotherap. 2, 291–293 (1972).Google Scholar
  125. Kahlenberg, H.: Thesis, Univ. Erlangen, Germany (1895).Google Scholar
  126. Kistner, D.H., Blum, M.S.: Alarm pheromone of Lasius (Dendrolasius) spathepus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and its possible mimicry by two species of Pella (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 64, 589–594 (1971).Google Scholar
  127. Kraepelin, C.: Untersuchungen über den Bau, Mechanisms und die Entwicklungsgeschichte des Stachels der bienenartigen Tiere. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool. 23, 289–330 (1873).Google Scholar
  128. Kratky, E.: Morphologie und Physiologie der Drüsen in Kopf und Thorax der Honigbiene. Z. wiss. Zool. 139, 120–200 (1931).Google Scholar
  129. Krombein, K.V.: Habits of Tiphiidae. Trans. Ent. Soc. Amer. 65, 415–466 (1939).Google Scholar
  130. Lacaze-Duthiers, H.: Recherches sur l’armure génitale des Insectes. Ann. Sci. Nat. 14, 17–52 (1850).Google Scholar
  131. Lande, I.S., de la, Thomas, D.W., Tyler, M.J.: Pharmacological analysis of the venom of the “Bull dog” ant. In: Recent Advances in the Pharmacology of Toxins, Proc. 2nd Int. Pharm. Meeting, Prague. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1963, Vol. IX, p. 71.Google Scholar
  132. Law, J.H., Wilson, E.O., McCloskey, J.A.: Biochemical polymorphism in ants. Science 149, 544–545 (1965).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Leuenberger, F.: Die Biene. Aarau: Sauerländer, 1954.Google Scholar
  134. Lewis, J.C., Lande, I.S. de la: Pharmacological and enzymic constituents of the venom of an Australian “Bull Dog” ant Myrmecia pyriformis. Toxicon 4, 225–234 (1967).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Lewis, J.C., Day, A.J., Lande, I.S., de la: Phospholipase A in the venom of Myrmecia pyriformis (an Australian bull dog ant). Toxicon 6, 109–112 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Lockey, R.F.: Systemic reactions to stinging ants. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 54, 132–146 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. MacConnell, J.G., Blum, M.S., Fales, H.M.: Alkaloid from fire ant venom: Identification and synthesis. Science 168, 840–841 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. MacConnell, J.G., Blum, M.S., Fales, H.M.: The chemistry of the fire ant venom. Tetrahedron 26, 1129–1139 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. MacConnell, J.G., Williams, R.N., Brand, J.M., Blum, M.S.: New alkaloids in the venoms of fire ants. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 67, 134–135 (1974).Google Scholar
  140. Malyshev, S.I.: Genesis of the Hymenoptera. London: Methuen, 1968.Google Scholar
  141. Maschwitz, U.: Gefahrenalarmstoffe und Gefahrenalarmierung bei sozialen Hymenopteren. Z. vergl. Physiol. 47, 596–655 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Maschwitz, U.: Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Funktion der Ameisenmetathorakaldruse. Oecologia 16, 303–310 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Maschwitz, U., Koob, K., Schildknecht, H.: Ein Beitrag zur Funktion der Metathorakaldruse der Ameisen. J. Insect Physiol. 16, 387–404 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Maschwitz, U.W.J., Kloft, W.: Morphology and function of the venom apparatus of insects-Bees, wasps, ants, and caterpillars. In: Venomous Animals and Their Venoms. Bücherl, W., Buckley, E.E. (eds.). Chap. 44, 3, 1-60 (1971). Academic Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
  145. Matsuda, R.: Comparative morphology of the abdomen of a machilid and a rhaphidiid. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. 83, 39–63 (1957).Google Scholar
  146. McCook, H.C.: The Natural History of the Agricultural Ant of Texas. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1879.Google Scholar
  147. McGurk, DJ., Frost, J., Eisenbraun, E.J., Vick, K., Drew, W.A., Young, J.: Volatile compounds in ants: identification of 4-methyl-3-heptanone from Pogonomyrmex ants. J. Insect Physiol. 12, 1435–1441 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Melander, A.L., Brues, C.T.: The chemical nature of some insects’ secretions. Bull. Wis. Nat. Hist. Soc. N.S. 4, 22–36 (1906).Google Scholar
  149. Michener, C.D.: A comparative study of the appendages of the eighth and ninth abdominal segments of insects. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 37, 336–351 (1944).Google Scholar
  150. Michener, C.D.: Hymenoptera. In: Taxonomist’s Glossary of Genitalia in Insects. Tuxen, S.L. (ed.). Copenhagen: 1951, pp. 131-140.Google Scholar
  151. Morgan, E.D., Wadhams, L.J.: Chemical constituents of Dufour’s gland in the ant, Myrmica rubra. J. Insect Physiol. 18, 1125–1135 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Morison, G.D.: The muscles of the adult honey-bee (Apis mellifera L.). Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 71, 395–463 (1927).Google Scholar
  153. Moser, J.C., Brownlee, R.G., Silverstein, R.M.: The alarm pheromones of Atta texana. J. Insect Physiol. 14, 529–535 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Oeser, R.: Vergleichend-morphologische Untersuchungen über den Ovipositor der Hymenopteren. Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin 37, 1–119 (1961).Google Scholar
  155. O’Rourke, F.J.: Formic acid production among the Formicidae. Ann. Ent Soc. Amer. 43, 437–443 (1950).Google Scholar
  156. Osman, M.F.H., Brander, J.: Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis der chemischen Zusammensetzung des Giftes von Ameisen aus der Gattung Formica. Z. Naturforsch. 16b, 749-753 (1961).Google Scholar
  157. Ouljanin, H.: Entwicklung des Stachels der Arbeitsbiene. Z. Wiss. Zool. 22, 289 (1872).Google Scholar
  158. Parrish, H.M.: Analysis of 460 fatalities from venomous animals in the United States. Amer. J. Med. Sci. 245, 129 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Pavan, M., Ronchetti, G.: Studi sulla morfologia esterna e anatomia interna dell’ operaia di Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr e ricerche chimiche e biologiche sulla iridomercina. Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. Milan. 94, 379–477 (1955).Google Scholar
  160. Pawlowsky, E.N.: Gifttiere und ihre Giftigkeit. Jena: Fischer, 1927.Google Scholar
  161. Piek, T., Thomas, R.T.S.: Paralysing venoms of solitary wasps. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 30, 13–31 (1969).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Powell, J.A.: Biology and behavior of nearctic wasps of the genus Xylocelia with special reference to X. occidentalis (Fox) Wasmann. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 37, 240–258 (1964).Google Scholar
  163. Quilico, A., Piozzi, F., Pavan, M.: Ricerche chimiche sui Formicidae. Sostanze prodotte dal Lasius (Chthonolasius) umbratus Nyl. Rend. Ist. Lomb. Sc. Lett., Cl. Sc. 91, 271–279 (1957a).Google Scholar
  164. Quilico, A., Piozzi, F., Pavan, M.: The structure of dendrolasin. Tetrahedron 1, 177–185 (1957b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Ratcliffe, N.A., King, P.E.: The venom system of Nasonia vitripennis (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Pteromolidae). Proc. R. Ent. Soc. London (A) 42, 49–61 (1967).Google Scholar
  166. Rathmayer, W.: Das Paralysierungsproblem beim Bienenwolf Philanthus triangulum F. (Hym. Spec.) Z. Vergleich. Physiol. 45, 413–462 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Regnier, F.E., Nieh, M., Hölldobler, B.: The volatile Dufour’s gland components of the harvester ants Pogonomyrmex rugosus and P. barbatus. J. Insect Physiol. 19, 981–992 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Regnier, F.E., Wilson, E.O.: The alarm-defensive system of the ant Acanthomyops claviger. J. Insect Physiol. 14, 955–970 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Regnier, F.E., Wilson, E.O.: The alarm-defensive system of the ant Lasius alienus. J. Insect Physiol. 15, 893–898 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Remane, A.: Die Grundlagen des natürlichen Systems der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Leipzig: Geest and Portig, 1952.Google Scholar
  171. Rettenmeyer, C.W.: Behavioral studies of army ants. Kansas Univ. Sci. Bull. 44, 281–465 (1963).Google Scholar
  172. Rietschel, P.: Bau und Funktion des Wehrstachels der staatenbildenden Bienen und Wespen. Zeitschr. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 33, 313–357 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Riley, R.G., Silverstein, R.M., Moser, J.C.: Biological responses of Atta texana to its alarm pheromone and the enantiomer of the pheromone. Science 183, 760–762 (1974a).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Riley, R.G., Silverstein, R.M., Moser, J.C.: Isolation, identification, synthesis, and biological activity of the volatile compounds from the heads of Atta ants. J. Insect Physiol. 20, 1629–1637 (1974b).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Ritter, F.J., Rotgans, I.E.M., Talman, E., Verwiel, P.E.J., Stein, F.: 5-Methyl-3-butyloctahydroindolizine, a novel type of pheromone attractive to Pharaoh’s ants. Experientia 29, 530–531 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Robertson, P.L.: A morphological and functional study of the venom apparatus in representatives of some major groups of Hymenoptera. Aust. J. Zool. 16, 133–166 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Russell, F.E.: Pharmacology of animal venoms. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 8, 849–873 (1967).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  178. Schildknecht, H., Koob, K.: Pflanzliche Bioregulatoren als Inhaltsstoffe der Metathorakaldrüsen der Knotenameisen. Angew. Chem. 82, 181 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Schildknecht, H., Koob, K.: Myrmicacin, das erste Insekten-Herbicid. Angew. Chem. 83, 110 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Schildknecht, H., Reed, P.B., Reed, F.D., Koob, K.: Auxin activity in the symbiosis of leaf-cutting ants and their fungus. Insect Biochem. 3, 439–442 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Schlunnegger, U.P., Leuthold, R.H.: Rapid identification of volatile compounds in insects with direct gas chromatography/mass spectrometry procedure: 3 octanone and 3-octanol in Crematogaster scutellaris and C. ashmeadi. Insect Biochem. 2, 150–152 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Schreuder, G.D., Brand, J.M.: The chemistry of Dufour’s gland and the poison gland secretions of Anoplolepis custodiens (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). J. Georgia Ent. Soc. 7, 188–195 (1972).Google Scholar
  183. Scudder, G.G.E.: Reinterpretation of some basal structure in the insect ovipositor. Nature. Lond. 180, 340–341 (1957a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Scudder, G.G.E.: The systematic position of Dicranocephalus Hahn, 1826 and its allies (Hemiptera-Heteroptera). Proc. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 32, 147–158 (1957b).Google Scholar
  185. Scudder, G.G.E.: The female genitalia of the Heteroptera: Morphology and bearing on classification. Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 111, 405–467 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Scudder, G.G.E.: The comparative morphology of the insect ovipositor. Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 113, 25–40 (1961a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Scudder, G.G.E.: The functional morphology and interpretation of the insect ovipositor. Can. Ent. 93, 267–272 (1961b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Scudder, G.G.E.: Further problems in the interpretation and homology of the insect ovipositor. Can. Ent. 96, 405–417 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Simpson, J.: The functions of the salivary glands of Apis mellifera. J. Insect Physiol. 4, 107–121 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Smith, E.L.: Evolutionary morphology of the external insect genitalia. I. Origins and relationships, to other appendages. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 62, 1051–1079 (1969).Google Scholar
  191. Smith, E.L.: Evolutionary morphology of the external insect genitalia. 2. Hymenoptera. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 63, 1–27 (1970).Google Scholar
  192. Snodgrass, R.E.: Morphology of the insect abdomen. Part I. General structure of the abdomen and its appendages. Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 85, 1–128 (1931).Google Scholar
  193. Snodgrass, R.E.: How the bee stings. The Bee World 14, 3–6 (1933a).Google Scholar
  194. Snodgrass, R.E.: Morphology of the insect abdomen. Part II. The genital ducts and the ovipositor. Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 89, 1–148 (1933b).Google Scholar
  195. Snodgrass, R.E.: Principles of Insect Morphology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1935.Google Scholar
  196. Snodgrass, R.E.: Anatomy of the honey bee. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Univ. Press, 1956.Google Scholar
  197. Soliman, A.: Der Bienenstachel. Zeitschr. Wiss. Zool. 13, 528–540 (1863).Google Scholar
  198. Spence, J.E.: A comparison of the allergic and immunological effects of the hemolytic component of fire ant venom. Tulane Univ. La. Med. School Prize Essay 7, 212 (1962, 1963).Google Scholar
  199. Spruce, R.: Notes of a botanist on the Amazon and Andes. II. London 366 pp (1908).Google Scholar
  200. Stumper, R.: Nouvelles observations sur le venin des fourmis. C.R. Acad. Sci. 174, 413–415 (1922)Google Scholar
  201. Stumper, R.: Sur la sécrétion d’acide formique par les fourmis. C.R. Acad. Sci. 233, 1144–1146 (1951)Google Scholar
  202. Stumper, R.: Données quantitatives sur la sécrétion d’acide formique par les fourmis. C.R. Acad. Sci. 234, 149–152 (1952).Google Scholar
  203. Stumper, R.: Die Giftsekretion der Ameisen. Naturwissenschaften 47, 457–463 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. Sudd, J.H.: An Introduction to the Behavior of Ants. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  205. Suslo’v, S.: Über die Kopfdrüsen einiger niederen Orthopteren. Zool. Jahrb. Anat. 34, 96–120 (1912)Google Scholar
  206. Talman, E., Ritter, F.J., Verwiel, P.E.J.: Structure elucidation of pheromones produced by the Pharoah’s ant. Monomorium pharaonis L. In: Proc. Int. Symp. on Mass Spectrometry in Biochem. and Med. Milan, 1973 (Frigerio, A., Castagnoli, N., eds.) New York: Raven, 1974, pp. 197-217.Google Scholar
  207. Thomas, D.W., Lewis, J.C.: Histamine release by the ant. Aust. J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci. 43, 275–276 (1965).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. Trojan, E.: Zur Frage der Oligomerie weiblicher Akuleaten. Z. Morphol. Oekol. Tiere 30, 597–628 (1935).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. Tulloch, G.S.: The metasternal glands of the ant, Myrmica rubra, with special reference to the Golgi bodies and the intracellular canaliculi. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 29, 81–84 (1936).Google Scholar
  210. Tulloch, G.S., Shapiro, J.F., Hershenov, B.: The ultrastructure of the metasternal glands of ants. Brooklyn Ent. Soc. Bull. 77, 91–101 (1962).Google Scholar
  211. Tumlinson, J.H., Silverstein, R.M., Moser, J.C., Brownlee, R.G., Ruth, J.M.: Identification of the trail pheromone of a leaf-cutting ant, Atta texana. Nature 234, 348–349 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. Vansclow, N.R.: Hypersensitivity to Hymenoptera insects. J. Arkansas Med. Soc. 63, 723–725 (1969).Google Scholar
  213. Vick, K., Drew, W.A., McGurk, D.J., Eisenbraun, E.J., Waller, G.R.: Identification of hydrocarbons from Novomessor cockerelli. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 62, 723–725 (1969).Google Scholar
  214. Walker, E.M.: The terminal abdominal structures of Orthopteroid insects: A phylogenetic study. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 12, 267–326 (1919).Google Scholar
  215. Wanstall, J.C., Lande, I.S. de la: Fractionation of bulldog ant venom. Toxicon 12, 649–655 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. Weber, N.A.: The sting of an ant. Amer. J. Trop. Med. 17, 765–768 (1937).Google Scholar
  217. Weber, N.A.: The sting of the ant, Paraponera clavata. Science 89, 127–128 (1939).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. Weber, N.A.: The stings of the harvesting ant Pogonomyrmex occidentalis (Cresson), with a note on populations (Hymenoptera). Ent. News 70, 85–90 (1959).Google Scholar
  219. Wheeler, G.C.: Ant larvae of the subfamily Cerapachyinae. Psyche 57, 102–113 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. Wheeler, J.W., Blum, M.S.: Alkylpyrazine alarm pheromones in ponerine ants. Science 182, 501–503 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. Wheeler, W.M.: The Social Insects; Their Origin and Evolution. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1920.Google Scholar
  222. Wheeler, W.M.: Social Life among the Insects. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1928.Google Scholar
  223. Whelden, R.M.: Additional notes on Rhytidoponera convexa Mayr (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 51, 80–85 (1957).Google Scholar
  224. Whelden, R.M.: Additional notes on Rhytidoponera convexa Mayr (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 51, 80–84 (1958a).Google Scholar
  225. Whelden, R.M.: Notes on the anatomy of the Formicidae. I. Stigmatomma pallipes (Haldemann). J. New York Ent. Soc. 65, 1–21 (1958b).Google Scholar
  226. Whelden, R.M.: The anatomy of Rhytidoponera metallica F. Smith (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 53, 793–808 (1960).Google Scholar
  227. Whelden, R.M.: The anatomy of the adult queen and workers of the army ants Eciton burchelli Westwood and Eciton hamatum Fabricius. J.N.Y. Ent. Soc. 71, 158–178 (1963).Google Scholar
  228. Williams, M.W., Williams, C.S.: Collection and toxicity studies of ant venom. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med. 116, 161–163 (1964).Google Scholar
  229. Williams, M.W., Williams, C.S.: Toxicity of ant venom. Further studies of the venom from Pogonomyrmex barbatus. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 119, 344–346 (1965).Google Scholar
  230. Wilson, E.O.: The beginnings of nomadic and group-predatory behavior in the ponerine ants. Evolution 12, 24–31 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. Wilson, E.O.: The social biology of ants. Ann. Rev. Ent. 8, 345–368 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. Wilson, E.O.: Chemical communication in the social insects. Science 149, 1064–1071 (1965).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. Wilson, E.O., Carpenter, F.M., Brown, W.L., Jr.: The first Mesozoic ants. Science 157, 1038–1040 (1967a).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  234. Wilson, E.O., Carpenter, F.M., Brown, W.L., jr.: The Mesozoic ants, with the description of a new subfamily. Psyche 74, 1–19 (1967b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. Wilson, E.O., Regnier, R.E.: Evolution of the alarm-defense system in the formicine ants. Amer. Nat. 105, 279–289 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  236. Wray, J.: Some uncommon observations and experiments made with an acid juyce to be found in ants. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 1670, 2063–2069 (1970).Google Scholar
  237. Zander, E.: Beiträge zur Morphologie des Stacheapparates der Hymenopteren. Z. Wiss. Zool. 66, 289–333 (1899).Google Scholar
  238. Zander, E.: Handbuch der Bienenkunde III. Der Bau der Biene. Stuttgart: Ulmer, 1911.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. S. Blum
  • H. R. Hermann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations