Advertisement

The Neuromuscular Junction: Areas of Uncertainty

  • Eleanor Zaimis
Part of the Handbuch der experimentellen Pharmakologie / Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology book series (HEP, volume 42)

Abstract

During a Symposium in Philadelphia in 1954, Sir Henry Dale discussed the beginnings of chemical transmission and told us that before Otto Loewi’s discovery in 1921 the general climate of physiological opinion still remained hesitant and sceptical. “Transmission by chemical mediators” Sir Henry Dale said “was like a lady with whom the neurophysiologist was willing to live and to consort in private, but with whom he was reluctant to be seen in public”. Progress since then has been more than spectacular, and today nobody doubts that the transmission from motor nerve to skeletal muscle is chemical and that the transmitter substance is acetylcholine. After its release the acetylcholine diffuses across the synaptic gap and acts on a component of the post-synaptic membrane, the so-called acetylcholine receptor. The molecular properties of these receptors at the neuromuscular junction have been intensively studied during the last three years and the evidence that they exist as actual chemical substances is now quite strong1.

Keywords

Acetylcholine Receptor Neuromuscular Junction Neuromuscular Transmission Neuromuscular Blocking Drug Depolarisation Block 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ali, H-H., Utting, J.E., Gray, C.: Stimulus frequency in the detection of neuromuscular block in humans. Brit. J. Anaesth. 42, 967–978 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Haim, D., Landau, E.M., Silman, I.: The role of a reactive disulphide bond in the function of the acetylcholine receptor at the frog neuromuscular junction. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 234, 305–325 (1973).Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, G., Tyler, C., Zaimis, E.: Mecamylamine and its mode of action. Lancet 1957 I, 218–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bigland, B., Goetzee, B., Maclagan, J., Zaimis, E.: The effect of lowered muscle temperature on the action of neuromuscular blocking drugs. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 141, 425–434 (1958).Google Scholar
  5. Bovet, D.: Some aspects of the relationship between chemical constitution and curare-like activity. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 54, 407–437 (1951).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, G. L., Dale, H.H., Feldberg, W.: Reactions of the normal mammalian muscle to acetylcholine and to eserine. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 87, 394–424 (1936).Google Scholar
  7. Burns, B.D., Paton, W.D.M.: Depolarisation of the motor end-plate by decamethonium and acetylcholine. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 115, 41–73 (1951).Google Scholar
  8. Cannard, T.H., Zaimis, E.: The effect of lowered muscle temperature on the action of neuromuscular blocking drugs in man. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 149, 112–119 (1959).Google Scholar
  9. Churchill-Davidson, H.C.: The changing pattern of neuromuscular block. Canad. Anaesth. Soc.J. 8, 91–98 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Churchill-Davidson, H.C., Christie, T.H., Wise, R.P.: Dual neuromuscular block in man. Anesthesiology 21, 144–149 (1960).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Churchill-Davidson, H.C., Katz, R.L.: Dual, phase II, or desensitization block? Anesthesiology 27, 536–538 (1966).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, P. J., Heisterkamp, D. V., Skovsted, P.: The effect of general anaesthetics on the response to tetanic stimulus in man. Brit. J. Anaesth. 42, 543–547 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crul, J.F., Long, G.J., Brunner, E.A., Coolen, J.M.W.: The changing pattern of neuromuscular blockade caused by succinylcholine in man. Anesthesiology 27, 729–735 (1966).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dale, H.H.: The beginnings and the prospects of neurohumoral transmission. Pharmacol. Rev. 6, 7–13 (1954).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. De Jong, R.H., Freund, F.G.: Characteristics of the neuromuscular block with succinylcholine and decamethonium in man. Anesthesiology 28, 583–591 (1967).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Douglas, W.W., Paton, W.D.M.: The mechanisms of motor end-plate depolarization due to a cholinesterase-inhibiting drug. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 124, 325–344 (1954).Google Scholar
  17. Eccles, J.C., Katz, B., Kuffler, S.W.: Effect of eserine on neuromuscular transmission. J. Neurophysiol. 5, 211–230 (1942).Google Scholar
  18. Elmqvist, D., Thesleff, S.: Ideas regarding receptor desensitization at the motor end-plate. Rev. canad. Biol. 21, 229–234 (1962).Google Scholar
  19. Feng, T.P., Li, T.H.: Studies on the neuromuscular junction. XXIII. A new aspect of the phenomena of eserine potentiation and post-tetanic facilitation in mammalian muscles. Chin. J. Physiol. 16, 37–56 (1941).Google Scholar
  20. Fogdall, R.P., Miller, R.D.: Neuromuscular effects of enflurane, alone and combined with d-tubocurarine, pancuronium, and succinylcholine, in man. Anesthesiology 42, 173–178 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foldes, F.: The pharmacology of neuromuscular blocking agents in man. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1, 345–395 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Foldes, F.F., Machaj, T.S., Hunt, R.D., McNall, P.G., Carberry, P.C., Irvington, M.J.: Synthetic muscle relaxants in anesthesia. J. Amer. med. Ass. 150, 1559–1566 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foldes, F.F., Wnuch, A.L., Hamer Hodges, R.J., Thesleff, S., Debeer, E.J.: The mode of action of depolarizing relaxants. Anesth. Analg. Curr. Res. 36, 23 (1957).Google Scholar
  24. Hall, R.A., Parkes, M.W.: The effect of drugs upon neuromuscular transmission in the guinea-pig. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 122, 274–281 (1953).Google Scholar
  25. Jenden, D.J.: Effect of drugs upon neuromuscular transmission in the isolated guinea-pig diaphragm. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 114, 398–408 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Karlin, A.: Chemical modification of the active site of the acetylcholine receptor. J. gen. Physiol. 54, 245–264 (1969).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karlin, A., Bartels, E.: Effects of blocking sulphydryl groups and of reducing disulfide bonds on the acetylcholine-activated permeability system of the electroplax. Biochim. biophys. Acta (Amst.) 126, 525–535 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karlin, A., Winnik, M.: Reduction and specific alkylation of the receptor for acetylcholine. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 60, 668–674 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Katz, B.: The release of neural transmitter substances. Liverpool: University Press 1969.Google Scholar
  30. Katz, R.L.: Modification of the action of pancuronium by succinylcholine and halothane. Anesthesiology 35, 602–606 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Katz, R.L.: Electromyographic and mechanical effects of suxamethonium and tubocurarine on twitch, tetanic and post-tetanic responses. Brit. J. Anaesth. 45, 849–859 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Katz, R.L., Ryan, J.F.: The neuromuscular effects of suxamethonium in man. Brit. J. Anaesth. 41, 381–390 (1969).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Katz, R.L., Wolf, C.E., Papper, E.M.: The nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking action of succinylcholine in man. Anesthesiology 24, 784–789 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lebowitz, M.H., Blitt, C.D., Walts, L.F.: Depression of twitch response to stimulation of the ulnar nerve during Ethrane anesthesia in man. Anesthesiology 33, 52–57 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loewi, O.: Über humorale Übertragbarkeit der Herznervenwirkung. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 189, 239–242 (1921).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maclagan, J.: A comparison of the responses of the tenuissimus muscle to neuromuscular blocking drugs in vivo and in vitro. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 18, 204–216 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Magazanik, L.G., Vyskočil, F.: The loci of α-bungarotoxin action on the muscle postjunctional membrane. Brain. Res. 48, 420–423 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Magazanik, L.G., Vyskočil, F.: Desensitization at the motor end-plate. In: Rang, H.P. (Ed.), Drug Receptors, pp. 105–119. London: Macmillan 1973.Google Scholar
  39. Masland, R.L., Wigton, R.S.: Nerve activity accompanying fasciculation produced by prostigmine. J. Neurophysiol. 3, 269–275 (1940).Google Scholar
  40. Michelson, M.J., Zeimal, E.V.: Acetylcholine: an approach to the molecular mechanism of action. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1973.Google Scholar
  41. Miledi, R.: The acetylcholine sensitivity of frog muscle fibres after complete and partial denervation. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 151, 1–23 (1960a).Google Scholar
  42. Miledi, R.: Junctional and extra-junctional acetylcholine receptors in skeletal muscle fibres. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 151, 24–30 (1960b).Google Scholar
  43. Miller, R.D., Eger, E. I., Way, W. L., Stevens, W.C., Dolan, W. M.: Comparative neuromuscular effects of forane and halothane alone and in combination with d-tubocurarine in man. Anesthesiology 35, 38–42 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nastuk, W.L., Manthey, A. A., Gissen, A. J.: Activation and inactivation of postjunctional membrane receptors. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 137, 999–1014 (1966).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Otsuka, M., Endo, M., Nonomura, J.: Presynaptic nature of neuromuscular depression. Jap. J. Physiol. 12, 573–584 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Paton, W.D.M.: Mode of action of neuromuscular blocking agents. Brit. J. Anaesth. 28, 470–480 (1956).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Paton, W.D.M., Waud, D.R.: Drug-receptor interactions at the neuromuscular junction. In: Dereuck, A.V.S. (Ed.): Curare and Curare-like Agents. Ciba Foundation Study Group No. 12, pp. 34–54. London: Churchill 1962.Google Scholar
  48. Paton, W.D.M., Zaimis, E.: The pharmacological actions of polymethylene bistrimethylammonium salts. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 4, 381–400 (1949).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Rang, H.P.: Acetylcholine receptors. Quart. Rev. Biophys. 7, 283–399 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rang, H.P., Ritter, J.M.: The effect of disulphide bond reduction on the properties of cholinergic receptors in chick muscle. Molec. Pharmacol. 7, 620–631 (1971).Google Scholar
  51. Richards, H., Youngman, H.R.: The ultra-short-acting relaxants. Brit. med. J. 1, 1334–1335 (1952).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Riker, W.F., Jr.: Actions of acetylcholine on mammalian motor nerve terminal. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 152, 397–416 (1966).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Suarez-Kurtz, G., Paulo, L.G., Fonteles, M. C.: Further studies on the neuromuscular effects of β-diethylaminoethyl-diphenyl propylacetate hydrochloride (SKF-525-A). Arch. int. Pharmacodyn. 177, 185–195 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Thesleff, S.: Neuromuscular block caused by acetylcholine. Nature (Lond.) 175, 594–595 (1955a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thesleff, S.: The mode of neuromuscular block caused by acetylcholine, nicotine, decamethonium and succinylcholine. Acta physiol. scand. 34, 218–231 (1955b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thesleff, S.: Motor end-plate “desensitization” by repetitive nerve stimuli. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 148, 659–664 (1959).Google Scholar
  57. Thesleff, S.: Nervous control of chemosensitivity in muscle. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 94, 535–546 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vernikos-Danellis, J., Zaimis, E.: Some pharmacological actions of bretylium and guanethidine. Lancet 1960 2, 787–788.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walts, L.F., Dillon, J.B.: Clinical studies on succinylcholine chloride. Anesthesiology 28, 372–376 (1967).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. White, D.C.: Dual block after intermittent suxamethonium. Brit. J. Anaesth. 35, 305–312 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zaimis, E.: Motor end-plate differences as a determining factor in the mode of action of neuromuscular blocking substances. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 122, 238–251 (1953).Google Scholar
  62. Zaimis, E.: The interruption of neuromuscular transmission and some of its problems. Pharmacol. Rev. 6, 53–57 (1954).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Zaimis, E.: Mechanisms of neuromuscular blockade. In: Bovet, D., Bovet-Nitti, F., Marini-Bettolo, G.B. (Eds.): Curare and Curare-Like Agents, pp. 191–203. Amsterdam: Elsevier 1959.Google Scholar
  64. Zaimis, E.: Parallelism of changes produced by cooling and by drugs known to affect adrenergic mechanisms. Nature (Lond.) 187, 213–216 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zaimis, E.: Experimental hazards and artefacts in the study of neuromuscular blocking drugs. In: Dereuck, A.V.S. (Ed.): Curare and Curare-like Agents. Ciba Foundation Study Group No. 12, pp. 75–82. London: Churchill 1962.Google Scholar
  66. Zaimis, E., Metaxas, N., Havard, C.W.H., Campbell, E.D.R.: Cardiovascular and skeletal muscle changes in cats treated with thyroxine. In: Research in Muscular Dystrophy, pp. 301–311. Edited by Members of the Research Committee of the Muscular Dystrophy Group. London: Pitman Medical 1965.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eleanor Zaimis

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations