The Ongoing Development of a Multimedia Educational Gaming Module

  • Elizabeth StokesEmail author
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 536)


This chapter gives an explanation of the development of an ongoing multimedia educational gaming module. Carrying out this module over many years resulted in establishing that pupils’ on the austistic spectrum have a diverse and variance in their educational abilities, medical conditions, computer skills, likes and interests. However, generic computer games were not being developed in collaboration with practitioners with the use of a holistic approach specifically for these learners. The objective was for undergraduate students to develop personalised games, from the practitioners’ completion of individualised profiles, as their assignment. The students used the profiles as a baseline, to carry out in depth research and used their imaging, sound, animation and authoring skills for developing games, whilst adhering to the practitioners’ specifications stated on the profiles. The chapter concludes by demonstrating the positivity of bringing society into academia with coursework based on real users, resulting in being beneficial to all the participants.


Multimedia Therapeutic Educational Games Software Module Students coursework Learners Practitioners Schools Autism Disabilities 


  1. 1.
    Stokes, E.: Ongoing Development of a Multimedia Gaming Module for Speech, Language and Communication. Pervasive Health—State-of-the-Art & Beyond Springer series book to be published 2014Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roberts, L.D., Allen, P.J.: Student perspectives on the value of research participation. In: McCarthy, S., Dickson, K.L., Cranney, J., Trapp, A., Karandashev, V. (eds.) Teaching Psychology Around the World, vol. 3, pp. 198–212. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roberts, L.D., Allen, P.J.: A brief measure of student perceptions of the educational value of research participation. Aust. J. Psychol. 65(1), 22–29 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Christensen, L.: Deception in psychological research: When is its use justified? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 14, 664–675 (1988). Cited in Foot, H., Sanford, A.: The use abuse of student participant. The Psychologist 17(5) May issue (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kimmel, A.J.: In defence of deception. Am. Psychol. 53, 803–804 (1998). Cited in Foot, H., Sanford, A.: The use abuse of student participant. The Psychologist. 17(5) May issue (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foot, H., Sanford, A.: The use abuse of student participant. The Psychologist 17(5), 664–675 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C.: Designing the User Interface, 4th edn. Pearson Addison Wesley, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elrod, C.C., Murray, S.L., Flachsbart, B.B., Burgher, K.E., Foth, D.M.: Utilizing multimedia case studies to teach the professional side of project management. J. STEM Educ. Innovations Res. (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stokes, E.: Profiles used in teaching research for developing multimedia games for pupils on the Autism Spectrum (AS). Int. J. Disabil. Hum. Dev. 7, 37–49 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnsons, S., Hollis, C., Hennessy, E., Kochhar, P., Woke, D.: Screening for autism in preterm learners: Diagnostic utility of the social communication questionnaire. Arch. Dis. Child. 96, 73–77 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Quinn, M.J.: Ethics for the Information Age, pp. 22–29. Pearson Addison Wesley, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Donegan, M., Morris, J.D., Corno, F., Signorile, I., Chió, A., Pasian, V., Vignola, A., Buchholz, M., Holmqvist, E.: Understanding users and their needs. Int. J. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 8(4), 259–275 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Niès, J., Pelayo, S.: From users involvement to users’ needs understanding: A case study. Int. J. Med. Inform. Hum. Factors Eng. Healthc. Appl. 79(4), 76–82 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elsom-Cook, M.: Principles of Interactive Multimedia. McGraw-Hill, London (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cox, D.: Task Analysis, Usability and Engagement. Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Design and Usability Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4550, pp. 1072–1081 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schuler, H.: Ethical Problems in Psychological Research. Academic Press, New York (1982). Cited in Foot, H., Sanford, A.: The use abuse of student participant. The Psychologist, 17(5) May issue (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., Beale, R.: Human–Computer Interaction, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, Harlow (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stokes, E.: Games for Learners with Autism and other Disabilities (GLAD) Personalised individualised educational software. Technology for Inclusion Conference Central Enfield City Learning Centre, July 2013Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science, School of Science and TechnologyMiddlesex UniversityHendon, LondonUK

Personalised recommendations