Spontaneous Interventions for Health: How Digital Games May Supplement Urban Design Projects

  • Martin Knöll
  • Magnus Moar
  • Stephen Boyd Davis
  • Mike Saunders
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 536)

Abstract

Health games seem to provide for attractive play experiences and promise increased effects on health-related learning, motivation and behavior change. This chapter discusses the further possibility of mobile games acting as a springboard for communication on health and its correlations to the built environment. First, it introduces the notion of spontaneous interventions, which has been used to characterize co-design projects in which citizens seek to improve infrastructure, green and public spaces, and recreational facilities of their local neighborhoods by adding temporary objects and installations to the built environment. Focusing on interventions, which aim to stimulate physical activity, this chapter identifies potentials and challenges to increase their impact from an ICT perspective. Second, the chapter gives an overview into current research and best practice of health games which seek to enable interaction with urban spaces through mobile and context-sensitive technologies. Specifically, it highlights “self reflective” games in which players seem to adjust their behavior in response to interacting with real time bio-physiological and position data. Observing how mapping technology enables users to relate objective data to subjective context, the chapter identifies how health games may supplement future urban research and design in the following aspects: Raising attention to new complexes, stimulating participation, identifying locales for potential improvement and evaluating impact. The chapter concludes with an outline of future research directions to facilitate serious games supplementing health-related urban design interventions.

Keywords

Mobile games Context-sensitive games Health games Urban design Urban planning Active design Playful intervention 

References

  1. 1.
    Health game research, http://www.healthgamesresearch.org/about-us. Accessed 10 Feb 2010
  2. 2.
    Philip, W., James, T., Jackson-Leach, R., Rigby, N.: An international perspective on obesity and obesogenic environments. In: Lake, A., Townshend, T.G., Alvanides, S. (eds.) Obesogenic Environments: Complexities, Perceptions, and Objective Measures, pp. 1–10. Blackwell, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benevolo, L.: The Origins of Modern Town Planning. Routledge, London (1967)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klencke, H.: Die physische Lebenskunst oder praktische Anwendung der Naturwissenschaften auf Förderung des persönlichen Daseins. Eduard Kummer, Leipzig (1864)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Göckenjan, Gerd: Kurieren und Staat machen—Gesundheit und Medizin in der bürgerlichen Welt. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main (1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Me You Health, http://www.meyouhealth.com/monumental/. Accessed 9 July 2013
  7. 7.
    Knöll, M., Moar, M.: On the importance of locations in therapeutic serious games. In: 5th International ICST Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pp. 538–45. Dublin: University College, Dublin, (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knöll, M., On the top of high towers—discussing locations in a mobile health game for diabetics. In: Blashki, K. (ed.) Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference Game and Entertainment Technologies, pp. 61-82010, IADIS Press, Freiburg (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Knöll, M, Moar, M: The space of digital health games. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Sport. 11 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burney, D., Farley, T., Sadik-Khan, J., Burden., A.: Active Design Guidlines—Promoting Phyiscal Activity and Health in Design. City of New York, New York, p. 70–9 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Janson, A., Tickes, F.: Fundamental Concepts of Architecture: The Vocabulary of Spatial Situations, pp. 330–335. Birkhäuser, Basel (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coenen, T, Laureyssens, T: Ludic Citizen Engagement. Presentation given at The Ludic City: Urban practices through a playful Lens, iMinds-SMIT, VUB, DiGRA, Brussels, Nov 2012Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Borden, I.: Skateboarding, Space and the City—Architecture and the Body. Berg, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ho, C.L.: Institute for Urban Design: Spontaneous Interventions: Design Actions for the Common Good. Exhibition for the U.S. Pavilion at the 13th Venice Architecture Biennale 2012Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Design that moves you, ‘stairway stories’. In: Spontaneous Interventions. http://www.spontaneousinterventions.org/project/stairway-stories. Accessed 10 Jan 2013
  16. 16.
    ‘Piano staircase’. In: The Fun Theory. http://www.thefuntheory.com/piano-staircase. Accessed 7 Jan 2013
  17. 17.
    Spontaneous interventions. www.spontaneousinterventions.org/project/stairway-stories. Accessed 10 Jan 2013
  18. 18.
    Rogers, Y.: Interaction design gone wild: Striving for wild theory. Interact. 18, 58–62 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    See for instance The Bartlett, in Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, http://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/casa. Accessed 10 June 2013 or Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). SENSEable City Laboratory, http://senseable.mit.edu/. Accessed 10 June 2013
  20. 20.
    Personal conversation with Dr. Katherine Willis, who co-runs a design course for architecture students dealing with interaction design at University of Plymouth, UK, www.inhabitingtheinbetween.wordpress.com/about/. Accessed 22 July 2012
  21. 21.
    Hansen, P.G.: The piano stairs of fun theory—short run fun and not a nudge!. In: I Nudge You, http://www.inudgeyou.com/the-piano-stairs-of-fun-theory-short-run-fun-and-not-a-nudge/. Accessed 6 Jan 2013
  22. 22.
    Smith, C., Quercia, D., Capra, L.: Finger on the Pulse: Identifying Deprivation using Transit Flow Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mergel, I.A.: Distributed Democracy: SeeClickFix.Com. for Crowdsourced Issue Reporting, Social Science Research Network (SSRN), 2012
  24. 24.
    See for instance Brooklyn Experimental Media Center at Polytechnic Institute of New York University, ‘Betaville: A collaborative online platform for proposals on urban design’, http://betaville.net/http://betaville.net/. Accecced 30 Jan 2013
  25. 25.
    Ho, C.L.: Statements. In: Spontaneous InterventionsDesign Actions for the Common Good, http://www.spontaneousinterventions.org/statements. Accessed 24 Jan 2013
  26. 26.
    Volkswagen. The fun theory http://www.thefuntheory.com/. Accessed 23 Jan 2013
  27. 27.
    Lieberman, D.A.: Interactive video games for health promotion: Effects on knowledge, self-efficacy social support, and health. In: Street Jr, R.L., Gold, W.R., Manning, T. (eds.) Health Promotion and Interactive Technology: Theoretical Applications and Future Directions, New Jersey & London: Mahwah, pp. 103–20 (1997)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lieberman, D.A.: Designing serious games for learning and health in informal and Formal Settings. In: Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., Vorderer, P. Serious Games—Mechanisms and Effects, New York; London: Routledge, pp. 117–30, (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Knöll, M.: Urban Health Games. Collaborative, Expressive & Reflective. (PhD dissertation, Universität Stuttgart, 2012) http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/opus/volltexte/2012/7782/
  30. 30.
    McGonigal, J.: Who invented CryptoZoo, and why?—CryptoZoo. In: CryptoZoo—a Secret World of Strange and Fast-moving Creatures, http://cryptozoo.ning.com/profiles/blogs/who-invented-cryptozoo-and-why. Accessed 10 March 2010
  31. 31.
    Bogost, I.: Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bogost, I.: Persuasive games on mobile devices. In: Fogg, B.J., Eckles, D. (eds.) Mobile Persuasion: 20 Perspectives on the Future of Behavior Change, pp. 29–37. Palo Alto : Stanford University (2007b)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Boyd Davis, S., Moar, M., Jacobs, R., Watkins, M., Shackford, R., Capra, M., Oppermann, L.: Mapping inside out. In: Magerkurth, C., Röcker, C. (eds.) Pervasive Gaming Applications—A Reader for Pervasive Gaming Research, vol. 2, pp. 199–226. Shaker, Aachen (2007)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Boyd Davis, S.: Mapping the unseen: Making sense of the subjective image. In: Nold, C. (ed.) Emotional Cartography: Technologies of the Self, pp. 39–51. Creative Commons, London (2009)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nold, C.: Introduction: Emotional cartography—technologies of the self. In: Nold, C. (ed.) Emotional Cartography: Technologies of the Self, pp. 3–14. Creative Commons, London (2009)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Waterson, N, Saunders, M.: Delightfully lost: A new kind of wayfinding at Kew. In: Museums and the Web 2012: The International Conference for Culture and Heritage On-line, San Diego, USA, Archives and Museums Informatics (2012)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mehm, F., Hardy, S., Göbel, S., Steinmetz, R.: Collaborative Authoring of Serious Games for Health. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (New York: ACM, 2011), IXX, pp. 807–808Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Göbel, S., Hardy, S., Wendel, V., Mehm, F., Steinmetz, R.: Serious games for health—personalized exergames. In: Proceedings ACM Multimedia 2010, Fiorenze, pp. 1663–1666Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Knöll
    • 1
  • Magnus Moar
    • 2
  • Stephen Boyd Davis
    • 3
  • Mike Saunders
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of ArchitectureTechnische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany
  2. 2.Department of Media and Performance ArtsMiddlesex UniversityLondonUK
  3. 3.Royal College of ArtSchool of DesignLondonUK
  4. 4.Open City LabsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations