Advertisement

How to Select Extra Allergens and Problematic Allergens

  • Klaus Ejner AndersenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis often have contact allergies beyond those tested in the baseline series. It requires knowledge and experience to select the appropriate extra allergens needed to perform the optimal allergological examination of the individual patient. The allergens may be acquired from commercial suppliers and the patient’s own topical products and working material. An allergen bank is a service available for dermatologists in certain countries. Reading and interpretation of patch test results with rare allergens is challenging and exciting. The Internet provides an increasing number of excellent websites useful for the dermatologist interested in performing optimal diagnostic patch testing

Keywords

Contact Dermatitis Patch Test Allergic Contact Dermatitis Contact Allergy Safety Data Sheet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Diepgen TL, Andersen KE, Brandao FM, Bruze M, Bruynzeel DP, Frosch PJ, et al. Hand eczema classification: a cross-sectional, multicentre study of the aetiology and morphology of hand eczema. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160:353–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cronin E. Clinical prediction of patch test results. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc. 1972;58:153–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cronin E. Clinical patterns of hand eczema in women. Contact Dermatitis. 1985;13:153–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krautheim A, Lessmann H, Geier J. Patch testing with a patient’s own materials handled at work. Chapter 82. In: Rustemeier T, Elsner P, John SM, Maibach HI, editors. Kanerva’s occupational dermatology. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. p. 919–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Menne T, Dooms Goossens A, Wahlberg JE, White IR, Shaw S. How large a proportion of contact sensitivities are diagnosed with the European standard series? Contact Dermatitis. 1992;26:201–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agner T, Andersen KE, Brandao FM, Bruze M, Bruynzeel DP, Frosch PJ, et al. Contact sensitization in hand eczema patients-relation to subdiagnosis, severity and quality of life: a multi-centre study. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;61:291–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Groot AC. Patch testing, test concentrations and vehicles for 4350 chemicals. 3rd ed. Wapserveen: AC de Groot Publishing; 2008. p. 1–455.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daecke CM, Schaller J, Goos M. Value of the patient’s own test substances in epicutaneous testing. Hautarzt. 1994;45:292–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slodownik D, Williams J, Frowen K, Palmer A, Matheson M, Nixon R. The additive value of patch testing with patient’s own products at an occupational dermatology clinic. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;61:231–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andersen KE. The allergen bank: the idea behind it and the preliminary results with it. Curr Probl Dermatol. 1995;22:1–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andersen KE, Rastogi SC, Carlsen L. The allergen bank: a source of extra contact allergens for the dermatologist in practice. Acta Derm Venereol. 1996;76:136–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goon ATJ, Bruze M, Zimerson E, Sorensen O, Goh CL, Koh DSQ, et al. Variation in allergen content over time of acrylates/methacrylates in patch test preparations. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164:116–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mose KF, Andersen KE, Christensen LP. Stability of selected volatile contact allergens in different patch test chambers under different storage conditions. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66:72–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gamboni SE, Simmons I, Palmer A, Nixon RL. Allergic contact dermatitis to indium in jewellery: diagnosis made possible through the use of the Contact Allergen Bank Australia. Australas J Dermatol. 2013;54:139–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dall ABH, Andersen KE, Mortz CG. Targeted testing with diethylthiourea often reveals clinically relevant allergic contact dermatitis caused by neoprene rubber. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;67:89–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mose AP, Frost S, Öhlund U, Andersen KE. Allergic contact dermatitis from octylisothiazolinone. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;69(1):49–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Christensson JB, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Johansen JD, Garcia-Bravo B, Gimenez-Arnau A, et al. An international multicenter study on the allergenic activity of air-oxidized R-limonene. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68:214–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Christensson JB, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Johansen JD, Garcia-Bravo B, Gimenez-Arnau A, et al. Air-oxidized linalool – a frequent cause of fragrance contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;67:247–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Dermatology and Allergy CentreOdense University Hospital, University of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark

Personalised recommendations