Common Sense Knowledge Based Personality Recognition from Text

  • Soujanya Poria
  • Alexandar Gelbukh
  • Basant Agarwal
  • Erik Cambria
  • Newton Howard
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8266)

Abstract

Past works on personality detection has shown that psycho-linguistic features, frequency based analysis at lexical level, emotive words and other lexical clues such as number of first person or second person words carry major role to identify personality associated with the text. In this work, we propose a new architecture for the same task using common sense knowledge with associated sentiment polarity and affective labels. To extract the common sense knowledge with sentiment polarity scores and affective labels we used Senticnet which is one of the most useful resources for opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In particular, we combined common sense knowledge based features with phycho-linguistic features and frequency based features and later the features were employed in supervised classifiers. We designed five SMO based supervised classifiers for five personality traits. We observe that the use of common sense knowledge with affective and sentiment information enhances the accuracy of the existing frameworks which use only psycho-linguistic features and frequency based analysis at lexical level.

Keywords

personality detection common sense knowledge affective and sentiment information 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cambria, E., Havasi, C., Hussain, A.: SenticNet 2: A semantic and affective resource for opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of FLAIRS, Marco Island, pp. 202–207 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Havasi, C., Speer, R., Alonso, J.: ConceptNet 3: A Flexible, Multilingual Semantic Network for Common Sense Knowledge. In: RANLP (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Hussain, A., Das, D., Bandyopadhyay, S.: Enhanced SenticNet with Affective Labels for Concept-based Opinion Mining. IEEE Intelligent Systems 28(2), 31–38 (2013), doi:10.1109/MIS.2013.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Havasi, C., Speer, R., Pustejovsky, J.: Automatically Suggesting Semantic Structure for a Generative Lexicon Ontology. In: Generative Lexicon (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lapponi, E., Read, J., Ovrelid, L.: Representing and resolving negation for sentiment analysis. In: ICDM SENTIRE, Brussels, pp. 687–692 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cambria, E., Hussain, A.: Sentic Computing: Techniques, Tools, and Applications. Springer, Dordrecht (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cambria, E., Speer, R., Havasi, C., Hussain, A.: SenticNet: A publicly available semantic resource for opinion mining. In: AAAI CSK, Arlington, pp. 14–18 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alghamdi, A., Aldabbas, H., Alshehri, M., Nusir, M.: Adopting User-Centered Development Approach For Arabic E-Commerce Websites. International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology, IJWesT (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Vinitzky, G.: Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior 26(6), 1289–1295 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boden, M., Mellor, D.H.: What Is Computational Psychology? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 58, 37–53 (1984)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Briggs Myers, I., McCaulley, M.H., Quenk, N., Hammer, A.: MBTI Handbook: A Guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, 3rd edn. Consulting Psychologists Press (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cattell, H.E.P., Mead, A.D.: The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF): SAGE Knowledge. In: The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment (2008), http://people.wku.edu/richard.miller/520%2016PF%20Cattell%20and%20Mead.pdf (retrieved May 27, 2013)
  13. 13.
    Celli, F.: Unsupervised Personality Recognition for Social Network Sites. In: The Sixth International Conference on Digital Society, ICDS 2012 (c), pp. 59–62 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coltheart, M.: The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33A(4), 497–505 (1981)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eysenck, H.J., Eysenck, S.B.: Manual for the EPQ-R. EdITS, San Diego (1991)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Golbeck, J., Robles, C., Turner, K.: Predicting personality with social media. In: CHI Extended Abstracts, pp. 253–262 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wilson, M.: MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine Usable Dictionary, Version 2.00 (1987), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.52.6928 (retrieved)
  18. 18.
    Isaacson, K., Peacey, S.: Human resources and social media (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    John, O.P., Naumann, L.P., Soto, C.J.: Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In: Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, pp. 114–158 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mairesse, F., Walker, M.A., Mehl, M.R., Moore, R.K.: Using Linguistic Cues for the Automatic Recognition of Personality in Conversation and Text. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 30(1), 457–500 (2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Matthews, G., Deary, I.J., Whiteman, M.C.: Personality Traits, Cambridge, UK, pp. 23–26 (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Noecker, J., Ryan, M., Juola, P.: Psychological profiling through textual analysis. Literary and Linguistic Computing (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oberlander, J., Nowson, S.: Whose thumb is it anyway? Classifying author personality from weblog text. Computational Linguistics, 627–634 (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tausczik, Y.R., Pennebaker, J.W.: The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29(1), 24–54 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tomlinson, M.T., Hinote, D., Bracewell, D.B.: Predicting Conscientiousness through Semantic Analysis of Facebook Posts. In: Proceedings of WCPR 2013, Workshop on Computational Personality Recognition at ICWSM 2013 (7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media) (2013)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mohammad, S.M., Kiritchenko, S.: Using Nuances of Emotion to Identify Personality (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sidorov, G., Castro-Sánchez, N.A.: Automatic emotional personality description using linguistic data. Research in Computing Science 20, 89–94 (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sidorov, G., Castro-Sánchez, N.A.: System for linguistically-based evaluation of psychological profiles. In: Dialogue 2006, Russia, pp. 464–467 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soujanya Poria
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alexandar Gelbukh
    • 3
    • 4
  • Basant Agarwal
    • 5
  • Erik Cambria
    • 1
  • Newton Howard
    • 6
  1. 1.Nanyang Technological UniversitySingapore
  2. 2.Jadavpur UniversityIndia
  3. 3.CICInstituto Politecnico NacionalDF MexicoMexico
  4. 4.Institute for Modern Linguistic Research“Sholokhov” Moscow State University for HumanitiesMoscowRussia
  5. 5.Malaviya National Institute of TechnologyJaipurIndia
  6. 6.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyUSA

Personalised recommendations