IT Exploitation Through Business Transformation: Experiences and Implications

  • Neil F. DohertyEmail author
  • Crispin R. Coombs


In recent years it has been argued that as information technology has become a largely undifferentiated commodity, the scope for organisations to use it strategically, to gain and sustain a competitive advantage, has significantly diminished. In this chapter, we seek to assess the extent to which organisations will need to switch the focus of their attention from IT development to ongoing IT exploitation, if they wish to deliver real value from their commoditised IT solutions. In particular, we seek to explore the complex relationship between software projects, organisational change and benefits delivery, to try to understand why, if IT is now such a readily available commodity, it still results in such a wide variety of organisational impacts and outcomes. In so doing, this chapter will seek to articulate and critique the strategies and approaches that organisations will need to adopt if they are to be more successful in managing the business change and delivering the business benefits that stem from the adoption of commoditised IT.


  1. Ahuja MK, Thatcher J (2005) Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Quart 29:3Google Scholar
  2. Ashurst C, Doherty NF, Peppard J (2008) Improving the impact of IT development projects: the benefits realization capability model. Eur J Inform Syst 17:352–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker T, Frolick MN (2003) ERP implementation failure: a case study. Inform Syst Manag 20(4):43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BCS (2004) The challenge of complex IT projects. British Computer Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg N (2008) Secrets to a successful commercial software (COTS) implementation. iUniverse, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Boudreau M-C, Robey D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: a human agency perspective. Org Sci 16(1):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr NG (2003) IT doesn’t matter. Harvard Business Review, Boston, MA, pp 41–49Google Scholar
  8. Chan YB, Gurbaxani V (2012) Information technology outsourcing, knowledge transfer, and firm productivity: an empirical analysis. MIS Quart 36:1043–1503Google Scholar
  9. Clegg C, Shepherd C (2007) The biggest computer programme in the world ever: time for a change in mindset? J Inform Technol 22:212–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clegg C, Axtell C, Damodaran L, Farbey B, Hull R, Lloyd-Jones R, Nicholls J, Sell R, Tomlinson C (1997) Information technology: a study of performance and the role of human and organizational factors. Ergonomics 40(9):851–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Currie WL (2011) Institutional theory of information technology. The Oxford Handbook of Management Information Systems: Critical Perspectives and New Directions 137Google Scholar
  12. de Vries J, Boonstra A (2012) The influence of ERP implementation on the division of power at the production-sales interface. Int J Operat Prod Manag 32(10):1178–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeSanctis G, Poole MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization 5(2):121–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doherty NF (2014) The role of socio-technical principles in leveraging meaningful benefits from IT investments. Applied Ergonomics 45(2):181–187Google Scholar
  15. Doherty NF, Coombs CR, Loan Clarke J (2006) A re-conceptualization of the interpretive flexibility of information technologies: redressing the balance between the social and the technical. Eur J Inform Syst 15(6):569–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doherty NF, Champion D, Wang L (2010) A holistic approach to understanding the changing nature of organisational structure. Inform Technol People 23(2):116–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doherty NF, Ashurst C, Peppard J (2012) Factors affecting the successful realisation of benefits from systems development projects: findings from three case studies. J Inform Technol 27(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dorgan SJ, Dowdy JJ (2004) When IT lifts productivity. McKinsey Quart 4:13–15Google Scholar
  19. Eason K (1988) Information technology and organizational change. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Eason KD (2001) The process of introducing information technology. Behav Inform Technol 20(5):323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Enders A, König A, Hungenberg H, Engelbertz T (2009) Towards an integrated perspective of strategy: the value-process framework. J Strategy Manag 2(1):76–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Esteves J (2009) A benefits realisation road-map framework for ERP usage in small and medium-sized enterprises. J Enterprise Inform Manag 22(1/2):25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fearon C, Manship S, McLaughlin H (2013) Making the case for “techno-change alignment”: a processual approach for understanding technology-enabled organisational change. Eur Bus Rev 25(2):147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fortune J, Peters G (2005) Information systems – achieving success by avoiding failure. Wiley, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilbert AH, Pick RA, Ward SG (2012) Does ‘IT doesn’t matter’ matter?: a study of innovation and information systems issues. Rev Bus Inform Syst 16(4):177–186Google Scholar
  26. Grint K, Woolgar S (1997) The machine at work. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanseth O, Jacucci E, Grisot M, Aanestad M (2006) Reflexive standardization: side effects and complexity in standard making. MIS Quart 30:563–581Google Scholar
  28. Hughes A, Scott Morton MS (2006) The transforming power of complementary assets. MIT Sloan Manag Rev (Summer) 50e58Google Scholar
  29. Jasperson JS, Carter PE, Zmud RW (2005) A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quart 29(3):525–557Google Scholar
  30. Koch C (2001) BPR and ERP: realising a vision of process with IT. Bus Proc Manag J 7(3):258–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leonardi PM (2007) Activating the informational capabilities of information technology for organizational change. Org Sci 18(5):813–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levinson M (2009) Recession causes rising IT project failure rates. CIO Mag 18 June 2009Google Scholar
  33. Markus ML (2004) Techno-change management: using IT to drive organizational change. J Inform Technol 19(1):4–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marler JH, Lian X (2012) Information technology change, work complexity and service jobs: a contingent perspective. New Technol Work Employ 27(2):133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martinsons M, Chong P (1999) The influence of human factors and specialist involvement on information systems success. Human Relat 52(1):123–152Google Scholar
  36. Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Review: IT & organisational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart 28(2):283–322Google Scholar
  37. Murphy GD, Artemis C, Unsworth K (2012) Differential effects of ERP systems on user outcomes—a longitudinal investigation. New Technol Work Emp 27(2):147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nevo S, Wade MR (2010) The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: antecedents and consequences of synergistic relationships. MIS Quart 34(1):163–183Google Scholar
  39. Orlikowski WJ (1996) Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective. Inform Syst Res 7(1):63–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Orlikowski WJ (2010) The socio-materiality of organisational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge J Econ 34(1):125–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peppard J, Ward J (2005) Unlocking sustained business value from IT investments. California Management Review, Fall, pp 52–69Google Scholar
  42. Peppard J, Ward J, Daniel E (2007) Managing the realization of business benefits from IT investments. MIS Quart Execut 6:1–11Google Scholar
  43. Powell TC, Dent-Micallef A (1997) IT as competitive advantage: the role of human, business, & technology resources. Strategic Manag J 18(5):375–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ravichandran T, Liu Y (2011) Environmental factors, managerial processes, and information technology investment strategies. Decision Sci 42(3):537–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ravichandran T, Han S, Hasan I (2009) Effects of institutional pressures on information technology investments: an empirical investigation. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 56(4):677–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robey D, Boudreau M-C (1999) Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: theoretical directions and methodological implications. Inform Syst Res 10(2):176–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sauer C. Davis GB (2010) Information systems failure. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences 3rd edn 1(1): 2643–2652Google Scholar
  48. Shpilberg D, Berez S, Puryear R, Shah S (2007) Avoiding the alignment trap in information technology. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 49(1):51–58Google Scholar
  49. Staehr L (2010) Understanding the role of managerial agency in achieving business benefits from ERP systems. Inform Syst J 20(3):213–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thatcher ME, Pingry DE (2007) Modeling the IT value paradox. Commun ACM 50(8):41–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ward J, Elvin R (1999) A new framework for managing IT-enabled business change. Inform Syst J 9(3):197–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Waring T, Skoumpopoulou D (2012) An enterprise resource planning system innovation and its influence on organisational culture: a case study in higher education. Prometheus 30(4):427–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wyld DC (2009) The utility of cloud computing as a new pricing-and consumption-model for information technology. Int J Database Manag Syst 1(1):1–20Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Information ManagementLoughborough UniversityLeicestershireUK

Personalised recommendations