Advertisement

nADICO: A Nested Grammar of Institutions

  • Christopher Frantz
  • Martin K. Purvis
  • Mariusz Nowostawski
  • Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8291)

Abstract

We propose a refined institutional scheme derived from Crawford and Ostrom’s Grammar of Institutions (GoI) that has been refined to provide a more comprehensive representation of conventions, norms, and rules, which extends to describing institutions in more detail but also allowing the expression of fuzzy aspects (e.g. the uncertainty about a sanction’s occurrence). After initially reviewing the GoI grammar structure (also referred to as ADICO), we discuss its adoption as well as limitations. We introduce selected extensions and refinements that enable the grammar’s ability to describe institutions in more detail, but also to capture more complex institutions as well as characteristics of institutions themselves, such as institutional regress.

Central features of our Nested ADICO (nADICO) include:

  • A notion of nesting monitored and consequential (’Or else’) statements, and

  • a refined differentiation between norms and rules.

nADICO both enables a more comprehensive expression of institutions and extends the use of the original grammar into various application domains, while taking the initial step towards a more dynamic perpective on institutional modelling.

Keywords

Grammar of Institutions Nested ADICO nADICO Institutions Norms Rules Institutional Statements Policy Modelling Multi-Agent Systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Conte, R., Dignum, F.: From Social Monitoring to Normative Influence. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 4(2) (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crawford, S.E., Ostrom, E.: A Grammar of Institutions. In: Understanding Institutional Diversity, ch. 5, pp. 137–174. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ghorbani, A., Aldewereld, H., Dignum, V., Noriega, P.: Shared Strategies in Artificial Agent Societies. In: Aldewereld, H., Sichman, J.S. (eds.) COIN 2012. LNCS, vol. 7756, pp. 71–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghorbani, A., Bots, P., Dignum, V., Dijkema, G.: MAIA: a Framework for Developing Agent-Based Social Simulations. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 16(2) (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ISO. ISO/IEC 14977 – Information technology - Syntactic metalanguage - Extended BNF (December 1996) (accessed on July 1, 2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Menger, C.: Problems in Economics and Sociology. University of Illinois Press (1963)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    North, D.C.: Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ostrom, E.: Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Savarimuthu, B.T.R., Cranefield, S.: Norm creation, spreading and emergence: A survey of simulation models of norms in multi-agent systems. Multiagent and Grid Systems 7(1), 21–54 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schlüter, A., Theesfeld, I.: The Grammar of Institutions: The challenge of distinguishing between strategies, norms, and rules. Rationality and Society 22, 445–475 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Siddiki, S., Weible, C.M., Basurto, X., Calanni, J.: Dissecting Policy Designs: An Application of the Institutional Grammar Tool. The Policy Studies Journal 39, 79–103 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smajgl, A., Izquierdo, L., Huigen, M.G.A.: Rules, knowledge and complexity: how agents shape their institutional environment. Journal of Modelling and Simulation of Systems 1(2), 98–107 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ullmann-Margalit, E.: The Emergence of Norms. Clarendon Library of Logic and Philosophy. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1977)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    von Wright, G.H.: Norm and Action: A Logical Enquiry. Routledge & Kegan Paul (1963)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Frantz
    • 1
  • Martin K. Purvis
    • 1
  • Mariusz Nowostawski
    • 1
  • Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information ScienceUniversity of OtagoNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations