Design of an RDFizer for Online Social Network Services

  • Junsik Hwang
  • Hyosook Jung
  • Sujin Yoo
  • Seongbin Park
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 279)


Recently, the number of online Social Networking Services (SNSs) such as Facebook or Twitter has been increasing and many users have various activities such as talk, image sharing and, making recommendations, etc. In addition, they can write their own profiles that contain a lot of personal information and values. If we can apply Semantic Web technology such as Resource Description Framework (RDF) to the information existing on SNSs, it can help analyzing valuable information in a machine-understandable way. In this paper, we propose an RDF Schema that defines social activities on SNSs. Then, we implemented a system by which data existing on SNSs can be converted into an RDF document using the proposed RDF schema.


Semantic Web Social Network Service Semantic SNS 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Zhou, B., Wu, C.: Semantic Model for Social Networking Federation. Advances in InformationSciences & Service Sciences 3(11), 1 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chao, W., Guo, Y., Zhou, B.: Social networking federation: A position paper. Computers & Electrical Engineering 38(2), 306–329 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Horowitz, D., Kamvar, S.D.: The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Social Search Engine. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2010, Raleigh, USA, April 26-30, pp. 431–440 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rowe, M., Ciravegna, F.: Ciravegna, Getting to Me Exporting Semantic Social Network Information fromFacebook, Social Data on the Web Workshop. In: Proceedings of the ISWC 2008 Workshopon Social Data on the Web (SDoW 2008), Karlsruhe, Germany (October 27, 2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    SIOC, (October 24, 2006)
  8. 8.
    Berrueta, D., et al.: SIOC Specification (March 25, 2010),
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Schaefer, C.: Motivations and Usage Patterns on Social Network Sites. In: 16th European Conferenceon Information Systems, ECIS 2008, Paper 143, Galway, Ireland (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hargittai, E.: Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social NetworkSites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1), article 14, 276–297 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th International World Wide Web (WWW) Conference, Raleigh, USA, April 26-30, pp. 591–600 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Hammer-Lahav, E.: Oauth community, OAuth (September 5, 2007),
  16. 16.
    Twitter developers (January 24, 2011),
  17. 17.
    Facebook developers (August 2006),
  18. 18.
    Node.js (2009),
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Patriquin, A.: Connecting the Social Graph: Member Overlap at OpenSocialand Facebook (2007),

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Junsik Hwang
    • 1
  • Hyosook Jung
    • 1
  • Sujin Yoo
    • 1
  • Seongbin Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Korea UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations