Abstract
In the context of Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, a decision-maker may be faced at any time with the task of analysing one or several sets of alternatives, irrespective of the decision he is about to make. As in this case the alternatives may express contrasting gains and losses on the criteria on which they are evaluated, and while the sets that are presented to the decision-maker may potentially be large, the task of analysing them becomes a difficult one. Therefore the need to reduce these sets to a more concise representation is very important.
Classically, profiles that describe sets of alternatives may be found in the context of the sorting problem, however they are either given beforehand by the decision-maker or determined from a set of assignment examples. We would therefore like to extend such profiles, as well as propose new ones, in order to characterise any set of alternatives. For each of them, we present several approaches for extracting them, which we then compare with respect to their performance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Belacel, N.: Multicriteria assignment method PROAFTN: Methodology and medical application. European Journal of Operational Research 125(1), 175–183 (2000)
Bisdorff, R., Meyer, P., Roubens, M.: Rubis: a bipolar-valued outranking method for the choice problem. 4OR, A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research 6(2), 143–165 (2008)
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C., Vecchi, M.: Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598), 671–680 (1983)
Meyer, P., Marichal, J.-L., Bisdorff, R.: Disaggregation of bipolar-valued outranking relations. In: An, L.T.H., Bouvry, P., Dinh, T.P. (eds.) MCO 2008. CCIS, vol. 14, pp. 204–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Meyer, P., Olteanu, A.-L.: Formalizing and solving the problem of clustering in MCDA. European Journal of Operational Research 227(3), 494–502 (2013)
Perny, P.: Multicriteria filtering methods based on concordance/non-discordance principles. Annals of Operations Research 80, 137–167 (1998)
Roubens, M., Vincke, P.: Preference Modeling. In: LNEMS, vol. 250, Springer, Berlin (1985)
Roy, B.: Decision science or decision-aid science? European Journal of Operational Research 66, 184–203 (1993)
Roy, B., Bouyssou, D.: Aide Multicritère à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas. Economica, Paris (1993)
Talbi, E.: Metaheuristics: From Design to Implementation. Wiley Series on Parallel and Distributed Computing. Wiley (2009)
Yu, W.: ELECTRE TRI: Aspects méthodologiques et manuel d’utilisation. Document du LAMSADE no 74, Université Paris-Dauphine (1992)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Olteanu, AL., Meyer, P., Bisdorff, R. (2013). Descriptive Profiles for Sets of Alternatives in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid. In: Perny, P., Pirlot, M., Tsoukiàs, A. (eds) Algorithmic Decision Theory. ADT 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8176. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41575-3_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41575-3_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41574-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41575-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)